Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH PLAN A MAGNET:Immigrants cite lure of border proposal
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | January 23, 2004 | Joe Cantlupe

Posted on 01/23/2004 12:27:48 PM PST by ckilmer

BUSH PLAN A MAGNET

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Immigrants cite lure of border proposal

By Joe Cantlupe COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

and Gregory Alan Gross STAFF WRITER

January 23, 2004

WASHINGTON – More than half the people accused of using phony documents to sneak through the San Ysidro port of entry in recent days said they were trying to get into the United States because of President Bush's proposal to give temporary legal status to millions of illegal immigrants.

Of 162 people stopped for using phony documents at San Ysidro since Bush announced his plan on Jan. 7, 94 said they were trying to enter because of the proposed new work program, according to sources present at a Wednesday meeting of a border-security working group in San Diego.

Border Patrol officials have reported a 15 percent increase in the use of phony documents at the San Ysidro port compared with the same period a year ago.

Bush's plan, designed to match willing workers with willing employers, would provide temporary legal status to illegal immigrants working in the United States and to others outside the country if they can show they have a job offer.

His proposal has been widely publicized in Mexico. In some quarters, it is being characterized as an amnesty, despite Bush's contention that it is not.

Some U.S. border enforcement officers and immigration policy experts have predicted that just talking about the proposal would encourage more people to try to get into the country.

"We're getting a lot of people asking about this," said senior border agent Sean Moran, who works in Imperial Beach. "They're asking what they need to do to qualify."

Many of the immigrants are "first-timers," said Moran, who also serves as spokesman for Local 1613 of the agents' union, the National Border Patrol council.

"At the Imperial Beach station where I work, I've noticed a definite spike in apprehensions," he said. "We're also catching more women and children, which we haven't in awhile. We're catching a lot of the same people every day."

Department of Homeland Security officials said the increases began in October, well before Bush unveiled his proposal.

"We were starting to see increases in the beginning of the fiscal year," said Mario Villarreal, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security.

The Border Patrol's San Diego sector headquarters reported 31,204 apprehensions of illegal immigrants between Oct. 1, 2003, which was the start of the fiscal year, and this week. For the same period a year ago, the number was 22,375.

Moran said he saw a surge last fall, but has seen another since Bush's announcement.

"There were a handful compared to several dozen now – an eightfold increase, and it all started with Bush's announcement," Moran said.

"These people are mostly volunteering the information. We are asking them, just out of curiosity, why they are here and they are asking how they qualify for this amnesty."

Wayne Cornelius, director of the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at UCSD, said he isn't surprised by an upturn in illegal immigration.

"It's not huge, considering the saturation publicity this has gotten in Mexico," Cornelius said. "It's predictable. This will continue until the new rules of the game are crystal clear ... maybe once Congress gets around to acting on the Bush proposal a year or so from now. We're looking at a fairly long period."

Talk of any amnesty-type program "attracts more illegal immigrants and that's not surprising," said Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington.

"The news doesn't necessarily spread accurately in Mexico or even among illegal aliens in the U.S.," Krikorian said. "They suspect there's an amnesty in effect. This is just attracting more illegal aliens and demoralizing our law enforcement personnel."

Immigration lawyers and immigrant rights groups say they, too, are getting inquiries from immigrants hoping to take advantage of Bush's proposal. "News travels quickly," said Angela Kelley of the National Immigration Forum, "and people are yearning for a better life."

Christian Ramirez, of the American Friends Service Committee in San Diego, said his group got at least 50 calls the day after Bush unveiled his proposal, "and it's been a constant flow ever since."

So far, Ramirez hasn't noticed any great influx, but as the immigration debate continues, he expects more people to head for the United States.

The confusion in Mexico about Bush's statements is understandable, Ramirez said, because of the differences between the way government works in Mexico and the way things are done in the United States.

Most Mexicans grew up under a government in which a proposed new policy from the president's office was treated as law.

"Bush made certain allusions, and some media outlets have characterized this as an amnesty, which plays on people's hopes, when in reality there's nothing there for them to grab onto," Ramirez said.

That has happened before, and not exclusively with Mexican migrants.

In the wake of Hurricane Mitch, which left thousands dead in Central America in late 1998, U.S. immigration officials announced that Hondurans and Nicaraguans already in the United States illegally would be granted a temporary legal status.

However, what was meant as a humanitarian gesture from Washington affecting immigrants already here was widely misinterpreted in Central America, especially in hurricane-ravaged Honduras, as a blanket amnesty for the hurricane victims.

Thousands poured across the border through Mexico, heading for the United States, only to be told at the U.S.-Mexico border that they had made the long, dangerous journey in vain.

Members of Mexico's Grupo Beta, which patrols the Mexican side of the border, said it's too early to tell if Bush's announcement is having a major impact on crossings in the Tecate and Mexicali regions.

"These are typically months when a lot of people are crossing," said Marco Antonio Caballero, an agent who works out of the Mexicali region.

Caballero said he recently ran into a migrant who mentioned that he was hoping to work under whatever plan Bush came up with.

But after being caught three times trying to cross the border, being robbed and losing weight, the migrant decided to go home and wait until the plan takes effect.

Dmitri Papademetriou, an analyst with the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., said that by making a public announcement of its intended plans, the United States created "all sorts of expectations across the board."

"The U.S. and Mexico should engage in a public service announcement," he suggested, "explaining there's no advantage to coming across the border illegally."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Gross: (619) 498-6632; greg.gross@uniontrib.com

Staff writer Anna Cearley contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: aliens; bushamnesty; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; immigration; immigrationplan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo
On your mark, get set, go!
41 posted on 01/23/2004 1:14:23 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
They're just coming here to present phony documents that Americans aren't willing to.
42 posted on 01/23/2004 1:18:11 PM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer; All; PhiKapMom; Tamsey; onyx; doodlelady; afraidfortherepublic; Wolfstar; ...
You know, if I saw one of you people -- just one! -- say something to the effect that, "Bush's immigration proposal is not in the best interests of this nation, but considering everything else, I'll be voting for him this November anyway," I'd give credence to your comments. Since these umpteen threads a day on immigration always end up as primarily anti-Bush tirade fests, it's difficult giving those who post to them any serious consideration.
43 posted on 01/23/2004 1:18:15 PM PST by My2Cents ("Failure is not an option.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Bush's immigration proposal is not in the best interests of this nation

Yep.

44 posted on 01/23/2004 1:19:29 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Get real. The laws are enforceable. What is lacking is the will.
45 posted on 01/23/2004 1:19:55 PM PST by Little Ray (Why settle for a Lesser Evil? Cthuhlu for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Like I said great tagline. Standing up for what's right, not just some political party sycophant.
46 posted on 01/23/2004 1:21:10 PM PST by Klickitat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
How can you say the laws are unenforcible? There has been no attempt at enforcement for a generation.

Police can't inquire about immigration status even when they arrest a felon who can't speak a word of English. Repeat felons can't be deported even when it is known they are illegals. Employers hire illegals with impunity.

I can't register my kids in a public school without presenting their social security card. Giving the SS number, as reported on my income tax form for the last 6 years, is not acceptable. And yet when we asked the school officials how all the children of illegals (estimated at 15% of the children in my daughter's school) were allowed to enroll without SS cards, we were told that "the government takes care of that". .

And you say the laws are not enforcible. GMAFB! The laws are not enforced because our elected officials have made the decision not to enforce them - not because the are unenforcible.
47 posted on 01/23/2004 1:21:19 PM PST by WayneM (Cut the KRAP (Karl Rove Amnesty Plan). Call your elected officials and say "NO!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I agree with your comments about immigration completely. We will never find a president who does 100% of what we wish, but for Freepers or anyone else to think that Democrats WILL close the borders, make us safer, spend less money, etc., is not clear thinking.

Any Freeper who stays home on election day had best not show up complaining if a Rat is elected into office.

President Bush has done a better job protecting the homeland than any Democrat EVER will or ever could. In addition, we have had tax breaks and he is asking Congress for a spending cap. Contrast that with the Democrats who want socialized health care and don't seem to believe in tax cuts AT ALL.
48 posted on 01/23/2004 1:21:44 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I'll also say this: I think a good portion of the anti-immigration fervor is racist in origin. I never throw around the race card, but the hysteria I tend to see on these threads I can only interpret as resulting from an irrational fear of seeing little brown people overrunning the country. Let's be honest...There are good reasons for not supporting Bush's immigration proposal. There are also some bad reasons as well.
49 posted on 01/23/2004 1:22:11 PM PST by My2Cents ("Failure is not an option.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I think a good portion of the anti-immigration fervor is racist in origin. I never throw around the race card

LOL

50 posted on 01/23/2004 1:24:00 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
You know, if I saw one of you people -- just one! -- say something to the effect that, "Bush's immigration proposal is not in the best interests of this nation, but considering everything else, I'll be voting for him this November anyway,"

I will be voting for President Bush in November. I will also continue to write, call and fax stating my opposition to any form of amnesty, or if you prefer "normalization".

51 posted on 01/23/2004 1:24:36 PM PST by Klickitat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
"You are most welcome to kindly read back to me in English the very....first....headline, from this daily Mexican newspaper, a day after Uncle Jorge's announced sellout of our national borders and integrity of the Republic...:

Who's Uncle Jorge?

52 posted on 01/23/2004 1:29:41 PM PST by TommyUdo (The Democrat Party-- Proudly Pimpin' off Po' Folk since 1964)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kevao
Hey, AmericanInTokyo. I read your tagline. So I guess you'd rather have Kerry or Dean in the White House?

Please kindly grow up and drop the fatiguing scare tactics. Really. Isn't that a little old by now? Why rehash the vomit of four years ago and every other race where we are forced to "choose" between only two: a RINO w/ a liberal, big-government agenda and a Communist, simply because we are (sic) Republicans? (Unless you were really indulging in sarcasm to make the Bushbots look foolish.)

53 posted on 01/23/2004 1:32:10 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (I argue as passionately on FR against ILLEGAL ALIENS as I would if Gore, not Bush were President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Actually, it's the latter. So many people have been saying that to me lately whenever I have an opinion that differs ever so slightly from Pres. Bush's, that I was just dying to use it on someone myself.

Oh, I forgot to mention. You're also a DU-ing, DNC-loving troll, and I hope you're ZOTTED!!!
54 posted on 01/23/2004 1:40:14 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Since these umpteen threads a day on immigration always end up as primarily anti-Bush tirade fests, it's difficult giving those who post to them any serious consideration.

It's also hard to give serious consideration to people who will ignore the numerous facts which demonstrate the enormity of this policy error.

55 posted on 01/23/2004 1:40:16 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
They'd come regardless.

In 1986 there was an estimated 300,000 illegals --- when the amnesty was announced, millions came pouring over the border to get in on it --- most of whom had never before stepped foot in the USA before that point. Amnesty which was proposed for the 300,000 illegals who were actually here ended up being given out to over 3,000,000.

56 posted on 01/23/2004 1:43:57 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
You didn't notice that the Border Patrol are actually intercepting these people?

If you think that there aren't hordes of illegals that the Border Patrol ISN'T intercepting, then you are stunningly naive.

57 posted on 01/23/2004 1:44:42 PM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
There seems to be trouble interpreting Bush words. Everybody wants to put their particular spin on what he says and what he doesn't say. As time goes on, the various alternatives keep changing. Green cards while working on naturalization requirements, but not amnesty, an employment program between employers and employees, a plan to enable aliens to register, a plan to get aliens enrolled in Social Security. Not one word of border security or deportation. That will come later when the latest trial baloon pops. It sure gets to be a problem trying to run a country on the latest reelection polls.
58 posted on 01/23/2004 1:50:32 PM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I suppose Bush could increase the INS and Border Patrol's resources to absolutely stop the flow entirely. But then the "real conservatives" here would complain that he's spending too much federal money.

Bush has promised to cut the federal deficit in half --- a very good place to find that money would be to go after the employers of illegals --- fine them $25,000 a head ---- depending on how many crimes they committed in hiring illegals. The fines could range from $5,000 to $25,000 and up --- with 20 million illegals here --- maybe 5 to 8 million actually working that could bring at least 25 billion to a trillion or more dollars.

59 posted on 01/23/2004 1:50:38 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
That's an awful lot of high-5-ing going on with the Mexican elite!! Ethnic cleansing is what they're trying to pull off. Imagine our leaders getting rid of our minorities and having a photo showing them so jubilant about it!
60 posted on 01/23/2004 1:52:44 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson