[b9]

This passes my WWHH? test...

What Would Hillary Hate?

[DrDeb]

THANK YOU FOR A MUCH NEEDED 'REALITY CHECK'!!!!!!!!!!

I met today with a group of advisees who also just happened to be vets from GULF WAR I -- to a man (no women present), they agreed that President Bush MUST be re-elected. If he's not, then the deaths of over 500 troops will have been for nothing. WHY? Because a Democrat President will either turn the War on Terror into a meaningless police action and/or subjugate our security/troops to the tyranny and corruption of the UN [The guys became absolutely apoplectic when they thought about the possibility of our troops wearing 'blue helmets'!]

After this enlightening conversation, I bumped into the chair of the Women's Studies Department who invited me to attend a late afternoon meeting with a representative from the National Organization for Women (NOW). The NOW rep was on campus to raise money (and an organization) for the express purpose of defeating President Bush in Ohio -- after all, Bush stands in the way of NOW's pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage/adoption, pro-Marxist, anti-military, anti-nuclear family, anti-Christian, and anti-white male of European descent agenda.

After showing this charming 'chair' my "I Stand With President George W Bush" sticker and watching her walk into the door on her way out of my office [I just LOVE playing with the warped psyches of radical feminists!], I sat down and wrote another check to the Bush-Cheney 04 campaign!

Yep, nothing like a little reality check to focus one's mind (and one's checkbook)!

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

I'm afraid that there is actually little difference between the Demicans and Republicrats. None of them actually believe in freedom.

[Lazamataz]

Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check

We'll see about that. He's already on record saying he will extend and make permanent the assault weapons ban.

Other than that, his runaway spending and CFR stuff turn me off so much, I just may not be able to muster the energy to get to the polling place this November.

[nutmeg]

AMEN, Jim!

...and a MAJOR BUMP!

nutmeg & zelig

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." - John Quincy Adams

Sorry Jim, you can convince the flock of sheep here to vote for Bush. But my vote's going to the Constitution Party.

[freeangel]

This does rather put things in perspective. Thanks for the post!

[Faith]

It's time to close ranks and support the man who has restored honor and dignity to the White House and has made America a safer place. I shudder to think of any other alternative.

[nutmeg]

ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

[The Shootist]

VANITY: The best way to keep America a sovereign free nation is to keep the Democrats and the RINOs out of power!

[Wolfstar]

Wonderful, Jim. Thank you very much for jumping into the fray. You're a hero to a lot of people, so your word has impact. I could not be more proud to be a part of your world as a very early and continuing FR member.

[TruthNtegrity]

Thanks, Jim.

If ever we needed a positive, uplifting thread, now is the time.

[petuniasevan]

Thank you for posting this.

Though I don't agree with the President on all issues (who does?) I will NOT hand the reins of government over to the socialists!

Those who vote third-party or write-in as a "protest" of illegal immigration issues or spending issues are really saying it's OK to punish the American people with the likes of a Kerry or a Dean so the Republican party can be "sent a message".

What excuse will they give when there are terror-bombed cities, martial law, and the abolishment of personal property? "I didn't know it would be this bad"? "

It'll be way too late once the chains are fastened.

[petuniasevan]

See this bump-list here:


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/involved?group=296

[foreverfree]

bump

[JulieRNR21]

BRAVO BUMP

[afraidfortherepublic]

Fabulous essay. Hereby nominated for essay of the week. Thanks.

[kayak]

[Kevin Curry]

A Democrat president wouldn't be able to crowbar half the loony leftist crap through a Republican-controlled Congress that Bush has been able to heave over the fence. A conservative president and a Repubican-controlled Congress is the right remedy for what ails us. If in this election our current president should forfeit his office by playing too loose in a mad gamble to win the support of the left, the next best remedy is to add to the Republican strength in Congress. A Kerry administration would go down in history rivalling the Buchanan, Grant, and Harding administrations for sheer uselnessness and futility.

I do not share the popular sentiment of the posters here who meekly give Bush a pass on whatever he wants to do out of pusillanimous fear of the Democrats.

Conservatives should be made of sterner stuff.

[livius]

Agreed! Thanks JR. I don't agree with Bush 100%, but I don't agree with anybody 100%.

I think there are things open to discussion in his plans.

But Bush is definitely our hope at the moment. Conservatives who say they are not going to vote for Bush because they don't agree 100% are going to make sure that a Dem is elected. But that may not bother them - one poster ticked off by the immigration plan (who of course offered no constructive suggestions) actually wanted a Tancredo/Kucinich ticket, because she said they agree on that issue. They probably do. In other words, extremes meet.

I have been very worried that FR was being used as an anti-Bush tool by Dem infiltrators, based on the hate-filled and irrational tone of recent (supposedly conservative) postings I have read here. Thanks for correcting things.