Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petition to Arrest Mayor Newsom
Petition to Gov. Schwarzenegger to Arrest Mayor Newsom of San Francisco ^ | 2/19/2004 | Nick Bradley

Posted on 02/19/2004 8:48:39 PM PST by Remember_Salamis

To: Califonia Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

Mayor Gavin Newsom of San Francisco has violated California law by Marrying Same-sex couples in San Francisco. It is patently unlawful to issue marriage certificates to same-sex couples. Section 308.5 of the California Family Code plainly defines a valid marriage as being limited to one man and one woman. Furthermore, California Penal Code section 115 prohibits the knowing procurement of any false or forged instrument to be filed or recorded in any public office, making such an act a felony punishable by up to three (3) years in prison.

The Mayor of San Francisco is giving the middle finger to the State of California and the United States as a Whole. To make it worse, Mayor Newsom and the City of San Francisco has stated that it is suing the state of California, challenging its ban on same-sex marriages on constitutional grounds. By doing so, Mayor Newsom is proposing that every law that was not a constitutional amendment is un-enforceable. If he is not arrested, there is no basis for drug laws, the carrying of concealed weapons, prostitution, and every other law that is not written into the constitution of the state of California.

Please arrest this man.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: anarchy; anarchyinamerica; anarcyinsanfrancisco; arnold; banglist; california; constitution; counterfeitmarriage; culturewar; deliverusfromevil; fraudmarriage; gavinnewsom; gay; gayintoleristas; gaymarriage; goodvsevil; governor; homosexual; homosexualagenda; law; leftsagenda; marriage; marriageammendment; ruleoflaw; samesexmarriage; sanfrancisco; sf; stunt; vice; vicenotvirtue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-220 next last
The rule of law is dead. please help. You might think that California might as well sink into the ocean, but your state is next.
1 posted on 02/19/2004 8:48:40 PM PST by Remember_Salamis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Sorry, click on this link: http://www.petitiononline.com/newsom/petition.html
2 posted on 02/19/2004 8:49:23 PM PST by Remember_Salamis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
I heard on the radio tonight that Chicago's mayor has declared he's going to do this too.
3 posted on 02/19/2004 8:49:39 PM PST by Triple Word Score
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Can't a bunch of Calif-based Freepers pose as "couples" and then make a citizens arrest when they make it to the folks giving out the licenses? Just wondering.

TS
...

4 posted on 02/19/2004 8:51:27 PM PST by Tanniker Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
BUMP
5 posted on 02/19/2004 8:54:59 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
The marriage "certificates" aren't valid. It's just a publicity stunt.
6 posted on 02/19/2004 9:00:45 PM PST by TheDon (John Kerry, self proclaimed war criminal, Democratic Presidential nominee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis; Carry_Okie; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; hedgetrimmer; ...
Short list, and Sacramento Area list.
7 posted on 02/19/2004 9:02:28 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
We don't want to make a martyr of Newsom, which would make him the hero to millions. We have to be very careful what course of action we take.
8 posted on 02/19/2004 9:05:40 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Gladly! Our leaders have to understand that they are NOT above the law.
9 posted on 02/19/2004 9:09:19 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (SHUT THE DOOR IN 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
so, the roos roberti AWB is really not enforceable, and can be ignored, because we KNOW it is an unjust and unconstitutional, and not even mentioned in the CA constitution. Hot damn!! I knew there was a reason for not turning in those awful assault weapons.

< (Note to ATF, just kidding)

10 posted on 02/19/2004 9:13:10 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triple Word Score
Then, they are going to have a lot of mayors in jail.
11 posted on 02/19/2004 9:17:15 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith
Why not go down with a chicken or your cat and apply for a marriage license? Why not--what's the difference--demand equality under the law. How do they know your chicken or your cat are not consenting to the marriage--those bureaucrats don't know your loving pets as well as you do.

Even better how about 1 man going down with two women and applying for a marriage license ala "menage a troi". Well, that may be pushing things a bit too far. Same sex humans or humans and animals that would be OK to the lunatic left, but polygamy? Never!! How horrid--old geezer patriarchs like Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David and Solomon practiced polygamy, we can't have that kind of immoral behavior going on in today's enlightened society. /sarcasm
12 posted on 02/19/2004 9:18:51 PM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Thanks.
13 posted on 02/19/2004 9:21:41 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Then, they are going to have a lot of mayors in jail.

So what? If we don't expect our elected officials to follow the law, they will come back with worse. Then we will get the Organization of American States Corruption office to make mockery of us in the eyes of the world. Even if you don't care what they think, the idea that a once great nation based on the rule of law has been so debased and so infiltrated by communists and anarchists in our government, you should feel shame. The rest of the nation does.
14 posted on 02/19/2004 9:24:28 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Wait I just thought of something. I am in love with a beauty of an AK-47 in Virginia, maybe this marriage can finally see us in wedded bliss living in the People's Republic of Kalifornia.
15 posted on 02/19/2004 9:44:31 PM PST by GodGunsandGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Herb Cain was a columnist for the SF Chronicle and he used to call San Francisco Baghdad By The Bay. Maybe its time to send in the 82nd Airborne!
16 posted on 02/19/2004 9:56:15 PM PST by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
as a citizen of california you can walk up to the mayor. restrain him and declare that he is under citizens arrest. The great thing is the police MUST arrest him, it is a felony for them to refuse a citizens arrest. Now they can release him once at the station but they must accept a citizens arrenst.
17 posted on 02/19/2004 10:01:37 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Bump! Petition signed...stop this insanity, Governor!
18 posted on 02/19/2004 10:22:15 PM PST by Sandmansleeper (Quinn's First Law: Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sandmansleeper
Gavin Newsom's wife is a prosecutor. Have her prosecute this. She did the dog mauling trial.

19 posted on 02/19/2004 10:49:50 PM PST by merry10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
It's a politician with no respect for his office pandering to the gay community. It's a sad human being that felt unimportant, and unnoticed when The Terminator was being elected, and wants some of the spotlight. It's the systematic destruction of American culture, and human tradition. By a radical Left, Which has been their agenda since Vietnam to Affirmative Action. To divide the citizenry of the nation and create a new proletariat for them to preach to.
20 posted on 02/19/2004 10:57:21 PM PST by freebacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
^
21 posted on 02/19/2004 11:00:39 PM PST by freebacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Remember_Salamis
While you may disagree with Newsom's actions, the legal theory behind your argument is simplistic and ineffective. Newsom has rather strong arguments as to the constitutionality of the denial of marriages based on sex and consequently sexual orientation. In the end, it will take a constitutional amendment to ensure that gays cant get married...that's not the case as of now.
23 posted on 02/19/2004 11:47:36 PM PST by abraxas_sandiego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis; Squantos
I'd like to see a mayor and police chief in some rural Kali town declare that they've read the 2nd amd, understand it, and will hand out Kali concealed pistol permits to any non-felon US Citizen for the asking.

That mayor would be on much stronger Constitutional ground, but you can bet the ATF would come in with MP-5's blazing in the first hour.

Some constituencies are more equal than others.....

24 posted on 02/19/2004 11:52:06 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abraxas_sandiego
What arguements would then be? And how would the same arguements NOT hold for polygamous marriages, or father/daughter or father/son or brother/brother marriages? Please explain how 3% of the population can demand that 5,000 years of civilization may be overturned to fit THEIR preferred perversion, but not the other?

Please give a detaile, logical answer FOR homo "marriage," but AGAINST the other cases?

What homohubris to declare "MY perversion is normal and worthy of marriage, but YOUR perversion is NOT!"

25 posted on 02/19/2004 11:55:40 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
the argument is that it's unconstitutional to deny someone a LEGAL right based on their race, sex, etc...if 2 hetero people can get married, then in all probability, it's unconstitutional to say that two gays can't. your argument about father/son marriages has zero bearing or applicability...it's not a LEGAL option for ANYONE.
26 posted on 02/20/2004 12:01:52 AM PST by abraxas_sandiego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Triple Word Score; snopercod; Criminal Number 18F
I wasn't at all surprised to hear that Da Mayor would to that. Hey, it completes his trifecta: orchestrating Chad-gate (with the famous Chicago Fraud Rod), illegally destroying Chicago's downtown airport, Meigs Field, in the middle of the night, and now this.

So, does that mean that we can turn San Francisco into a concealed carry city and county, even if it doesn't comply with their laws? I mean, I don't agree with that, so it's OK, right?

(sound of crickets chirping.)
27 posted on 02/20/2004 12:03:04 AM PST by bootless (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freebacon
"It's a politician with no respect for his office pandering to the gay community. It's a sad human being that felt unimportant, and unnoticed when The Terminator was being elected, and wants some of the spotlight. It's the systematic destruction of American culture, and human tradition. By a radical Left, Which has been their agenda since Vietnam to Affirmative Action. To divide the citizenry of the nation and create a new proletariat for them to preach to."

AMEN. 100% AMEN.

28 posted on 02/20/2004 12:04:57 AM PST by EUPHORIC (Right? Left? Read Ecclesiastes 10:2 for a definition. The Bible knows all about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsandGuts
"Wait I just thought of something. I am in love with a beauty of an AK-47 in Virginia..."

Man are YOU going to have to get some MAJOR surgical alterations to consummate THAT marriage...

Bring grease...

29 posted on 02/20/2004 12:08:08 AM PST by EUPHORIC (Right? Left? Read Ecclesiastes 10:2 for a definition. The Bible knows all about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: abraxas_sandiego
"While you may disagree with Newsom's actions..."

Poppycock.

30 posted on 02/20/2004 12:09:52 AM PST by EUPHORIC (Right? Left? Read Ecclesiastes 10:2 for a definition. The Bible knows all about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: abraxas_sandiego
"if 2 hetero people can get married, then in all probability, it's unconstitutional to say that two gays can't. your argument about father/son marriages has zero bearing or applicability..."

Twist and spin. Nothing but BS 100%.

31 posted on 02/20/2004 12:12:27 AM PST by EUPHORIC (Right? Left? Read Ecclesiastes 10:2 for a definition. The Bible knows all about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EUPHORIC
wow...what an insightful, intelligent response. well done.
32 posted on 02/20/2004 12:18:30 AM PST by abraxas_sandiego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
I dunno about that. He is already a hero to millions, and if we do nothing it will encourage more 'heroes' like Mayor Daley to do the same.

The state AG should investigate and go to court to issue am injunction to stop these marriages going on in SF. Then, take the process to the courts, where it will be decided fairly.

A state court could find Prop 22 illegal under the California State Charter. If that's the case, Cali should take steps to amend it's Constitution defining marriage, just like we did here in Nevada.

If the state court finds that the law is valid, then SF can't issue the licenses. My guess is that even then, they won't stop. The recourse then is to arrest the folks who are giving these licenses, or fine the city of SF (amd the elected officials personally) for every invalid license it wilfully issued, or some combination of those remedies.

I agree we shouldn't be ras, but clearly SF can't be allowed to continue breaking the law. What course of action would you prefer?
34 posted on 02/20/2004 1:54:03 AM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTT!!!!!
35 posted on 02/20/2004 3:04:13 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
We don't want to make a martyr of Newsom, which would make him the hero to millions. We have to be very careful what course of action we take.

I agree. Everyone in S.F. with a parking ticket should return it and say they don't believe the city has the authority to charge parking to the very citizens that own the public land, and since Newsom can ignore laws then laws don't apply to parking tickets as well.

36 posted on 02/20/2004 4:03:11 AM PST by highlander_UW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abraxas_sandiego
A marriage license isn't a right, it's a privilege. If it was a right then incest, polygamy, and polyandry wouldn't be illegal, too.
37 posted on 02/20/2004 4:04:38 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: abraxas_sandiego
the argument is that it's unconstitutional to deny someone a LEGAL right based on their race, sex, etc...if 2 hetero people can get married, then in all probability, it's unconstitutional to say that two gays can't. your argument about father/son marriages has zero bearing or applicability...it's not a LEGAL option for ANYONE.

False logic here. Heterosexual and homosexual people have an EQUAL right to marry someone of the opposite sex. There is no discrimination. The efforts are to change the meaning of marriage...and if it can be changed to fit one perversion, why not others?

38 posted on 02/20/2004 4:08:05 AM PST by highlander_UW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
Obviously they are.

It does not matter what the law is. Its what you think the law is.

39 posted on 02/20/2004 5:23:36 AM PST by expatguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
...but your state is next.

Actually, my state, Vermont, was, sadly, first.

40 posted on 02/20/2004 5:30:49 AM PST by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Shouldn't this petition be directed at the State Attorney General instead of the Governor?
41 posted on 02/20/2004 6:29:39 AM PST by w1andsodidwe (recycling is a waste of time for hardworking taxpayers, hire the homeless to sort garbage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis; JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; ...
SIGNED/BTTT !!!

43. David C. Osborne (www.davidosborne.net) Dear Gov. : Please uphold the RULE OF LAW in your State, If you have the authority to remove this man from office pleae do so IMMEDIATELY.. After removing him from office please ensure that any applicable criminal charges are filed... The WORLD is watching... whatcha gonna do sir?
42 posted on 02/20/2004 6:42:11 AM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
BTTT!!!!!!
43 posted on 02/20/2004 6:43:15 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe
I would think that the AG could not act so long as he is IN office... The Gov. would have to remove him first... I called the Gov. Office yesterday, and was told that the Gov. does NOT have the authority to remove him from office, and that he must be IMPEACHED.. any CA lawyers out there that can shed some light on this?
44 posted on 02/20/2004 6:47:05 AM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Registered

Reg,

Can you do anyhting with this?

45 posted on 02/20/2004 6:55:47 AM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
Publicity or no, this city mayor has violated state law ... where's the Terminator? This is what one gets with a RINO.
46 posted on 02/20/2004 6:56:19 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abraxas_sandiego
My religion, for which I am an minister, ordained by an accredited internet source for diplomas, decrees that all males at 18 shall marry two females. If two females are not available then the male is free to substitute one for a close personal family member or a border collie.

Our attorney assures us that there are strong constitutional reasons why we will prevail. We believe that it is unconstitutional to discriminate against us due to our religious beliefs, plus we want insurance benefits the same as married couples everywhere....

47 posted on 02/20/2004 7:18:27 AM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
Please sign this petition.
48 posted on 02/20/2004 7:36:08 AM PST by Coleus (Help Tyler Schicke http://tylerfund.org/ Burkitt's leukemia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
bump
49 posted on 02/20/2004 7:45:44 AM PST by freebacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Why not recall this anarchist bozo?
50 posted on 02/20/2004 8:02:36 AM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson