Skip to comments.
Petition to Arrest Mayor Newsom
Petition to Gov. Schwarzenegger to Arrest Mayor Newsom of San Francisco ^
| 2/19/2004
| Nick Bradley
Posted on 02/19/2004 8:48:39 PM PST by Remember_Salamis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-220 next last
To: Remember_Salamis
Shouldn't this petition be directed at the State Attorney General instead of the Governor?
41
posted on
02/20/2004 6:29:39 AM PST
by
w1andsodidwe
(recycling is a waste of time for hardworking taxpayers, hire the homeless to sort garbage)
To: Remember_Salamis; JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; ...
SIGNED/BTTT !!!
43. David C. Osborne (www.davidosborne.net) Dear Gov. : Please uphold the RULE OF LAW in your State, If you have the authority to remove this man from office pleae do so IMMEDIATELY.. After removing him from office please ensure that any applicable criminal charges are filed... The WORLD is watching... whatcha gonna do sir?
42
posted on
02/20/2004 6:42:11 AM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: davidosborne
BTTT!!!!!!
43
posted on
02/20/2004 6:43:15 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: w1andsodidwe
I would think that the AG could not act so long as he is IN office... The Gov. would have to remove him first... I called the Gov. Office yesterday, and was told that the Gov. does NOT have the authority to remove him from office, and that he must be IMPEACHED.. any CA lawyers out there that can shed some light on this?
44
posted on
02/20/2004 6:47:05 AM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: Registered
Reg,
Can you do anyhting with this?
45
posted on
02/20/2004 6:55:47 AM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: TheDon
Publicity or no, this city mayor has violated state law ... where's the Terminator? This is what one gets with a RINO.
46
posted on
02/20/2004 6:56:19 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: abraxas_sandiego
My religion, for which I am an minister, ordained by an accredited internet source for diplomas, decrees that all males at 18 shall marry two females. If two females are not available then the male is free to substitute one for a close personal family member or a border collie.
Our attorney assures us that there are strong constitutional reasons why we will prevail. We believe that it is unconstitutional to discriminate against us due to our religious beliefs, plus we want insurance benefits the same as married couples everywhere....
To: davidosborne; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
Please sign this petition.
48
posted on
02/20/2004 7:36:08 AM PST
by
Coleus
(Help Tyler Schicke http://tylerfund.org/ Burkitt's leukemia)
To: Remember_Salamis
bump
To: davidosborne
Why not recall this anarchist bozo?
50
posted on
02/20/2004 8:02:36 AM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: little jeremiah
51
posted on
02/20/2004 8:22:08 AM PST
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: My2Cents
What is the process for that?
52
posted on
02/20/2004 8:35:27 AM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: Remember_Salamis
I signed with the following comments:
"The State Attorney General of California should immediately be directed by the Governor to prefer criminal charges against the Mayor of San Fransisco and any other city officials complicit in the issuance of these illegal marriage licenses. There is a break down in the rule of law going on in California, in conjunction with a break down in morality...which morality is the very basis for all of our laws. John Adams, one of the principle architects of our constitution said it best with these words: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."- John Adams, Oct. 11, 1798. It is just as true today."
To: abraxas_sandiego; Travis McGee
Pure Bravo Sierra. Such simplistic arguements as you make, abraxas_sandiego, would then allow for a legal basis for any number of adults, irrespective of sex, orientation, etc. to consumate a marriage. Sixteen hereosexual males, five homosexual males, thrirteen lesbians and ten normal women could all come together and demand a marriage license for the whole according to your logic.
What you are ignoring, and what the entire gay agenda would have everyone ignore, but what has guided this nation since its inception in such matters is common sense and an underlying moral foundation.
The principle definition of marriage (the act which weds) and matrimony (the state which is entered as a result of marriage)is as follows:
marriage: the state, act or right of being married, a relation between a husband and wife.
matrimony: the state of being husband and wife There is no historical precedence in this nation for anything else and what is happening now is a pure wresting and perversion of our institutions in a vain attempt to satisfy the hedonistic cravings of those pursuing alternate lifestyles in order to force them to be acceptable.
That dog don't hunt...that dog CAN'T hunt.
John Adams addressed this type of issue best with the following words:
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."- John Adams, Oct. 11, 1798
As we lose that defining principle...we lose our republic and all it is based upon. That is what is really happening here.
To: Jeff Head
Great post Jeff.....BTTT !!!
David
55
posted on
02/20/2004 9:00:31 AM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: MHGinTN
Schwarzenegger on Same-Sex Marriage Lawsuit by San Francisco
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger released the following statement today:
"The people of California spoke on the issue of same-sex marriage when Prop. 22 was overwhelmingly passed in 2000. I will abide by the oath I took when I was sworn-in to uphold California's laws.
"The marriage certificates submitted to the Department of Health Services by the City and County of San Francisco fail to meet legal standards. The Attorney General has assured me that he will vigorously defend the constitutionality of the law in the case brought against the state by San Francisco."
56
posted on
02/20/2004 9:19:45 AM PST
by
TheDon
(John Kerry, self proclaimed war criminal, Democratic Presidential nominee)
To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; Critter; Lurker; harpseal; ...
I signed this petition as number 62 with the following comments:
"The State Attorney General of California should immediately be directed by the Governor to prefer criminal charges against the Mayor of San Fransisco and any other city officials complicit in the issuance of these illegal marriage licenses. There is a break down in the rule of law going on in California, in conjunction with a break down in morality...which morality is the very basis for all of our laws. John Adams, one of the principle architects of our constitution said it best with these words: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."- John Adams, Oct. 11, 1798. It is just as true today."
Please take a look at and consider signing the petition at:
http://www.petitiononline.com/newsom/petition.html
... and then forwarding the petition on to your email lists asking them to sign and then forward it on to their lists...and so forth and so forth. Get the email chains and the exponential growth going!
To: davidosborne
Thanks. In post 57 i pinged my entire list.
To: Jeff Head
Thanks Jeff.
59
posted on
02/20/2004 10:17:34 AM PST
by
SAMWolf
(Contrary to popular belief Hamas has nothing to do with ham. If you throw ham at them they get angry)
To: Jeff Head
Thanks for the ping!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-220 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson