"Queer Marriage" Why should we tolerate the sickness?

Patriot Edition's Weblogs ^ | 2/25/04 | Billy Kess

[PatriotEdition]

Greetings fans and foes...

President Bush lashed out against the equal rights of gays yesterday morning in a homophobic and hate-filled speech about marriage... No. I am kidding. This, of course, falls just short of the way our liberal friends in the media would like to portray it, though. This is what makes me sick.

First of all, i want to make one thing clear. There is not going to be a double-standard in what we perceive the word "queer" to be. There is a TV show, as most people are aware of, that has 4 homosexual men give a heterosexual man a make-over. The name of the show is "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy". Now... since i have not seen any gay groups expressing any anger or contempt over the name of the show, i am forced to assume that the word "queer" is no longer considered derogatory.

So from now on, i will refer to them as queers.

After all, the word "queer" means strange, or unusual. And a man who is attracted to other men in sexual ways is just that... unusual. So while the queers and social liberals of society try to make up new words like "homophobe" in order to defame and discredit anyone who DISAGREES, and take a word that used to mean "happy" and change its meaning, i will now refer to "gays" as queers. Because in all fairness, i would imagine them to be closer to unusual than happy. Wouldn't you agree?

Why do God-fearing people have to tolerate what we see as evil? Why do normal people have to tolerate what we see as sick and abnormal? Why should ANYONE have to tolerate queers putting their hands on children in an attempt to adopt them into their twisted version of a "family"? I AM SICK OF IT - KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF INNOCENT KIDS - there are plenty of normal, heterosexual couples waiting to adopt. Keep your hands off of innocent kids and stay clear of the alter! Marriage is for MAN and WOMAN!

Okay... Bush got up to the podium and defended marriage. So what? What is so "hateful" about defending marriage? What is so bad about saying that marriage is for a MAN and a WOMAN? I want to know. Let's go over some pointers involving gay marriage, the mayor of San Francisco, John Kerry, George W. Bush, the social liberals, the Christians, and all others involved on both sides of the debate.

Since Bush's speech, already the loony left and the "christophobes" and the "heterophobes" have launched their attacks against him. Bush is doing this to appease his "conservative base". Have you ever thought that perhaps Bush is simply speaking from his heart? This is not - and i repeat - NOT - a "christian agenda". Go ask a Muslim or a Jew what their religion says about same-sex marriages... the answers would be similiar. Stop accusing Christians of being hateful. Was Bill Clinton "appeasing" the conservative base when he signed the Defense of Marriage Act into law?

Another amusing development in the whole gay marriage fiasco is John Kerry pretending to be "uninformed" about the whole thing. When he was asked for an opinion on the gay marriages in San Francisco, he replied that he was not fully aware of what was going on there. Not fully aware? A mayor of a major U.S. city is breaking the law and you are "not aware"? Sir, with all due respect, you are RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT! I mean, i can respect your answer more had you said "no comment" or something... but to LIE and say that you are not "aware"???

And as for breaking the law, i have heard time and time again since this whole queer-marriage thing started happening... the radical queers and the social liberals praising the mayor of San Fran for breaking the law for a "good" reason. Like some vigilantic hero. Well, you radical, hateful, intolerant airheads, let me ask you this... what about Justice Roy Moore and the 10 Commandments statue? And what's worse? Giving marital status to THOUSANDS of queer-couples, or refusing to remove a statue with 10 laws on it that no one is even being forced to look at? You tell me.

Marriage is for a man and woman... and that is not just a "christian ideal"... that is the universal idea for marriage in EVERY SINGLE MAJOR RELIGION throughout the WORLD. Don't like it? TOUGH... Try exercising a little TOLERANCE, liberals! You're all familiar with the word TOLERANCE, aren't you? Get your sick, twisted view of "family" OUT of my face and the faces of people who respect what marriage is and what marriage has been for EONS.

This, of course, is my opinion... In the meantime, don't take my word for it... I am just a raver from the right. Please look at this site before jumping on my ass. Questions and Answers: What's Wrong With Letting Same-Sex Couples "Marry?" <-- look at that.

Website: The Patriot Edition

This is Billy Kess - a.k.a. PatriotEdition, a.k.a. StormyWeather ... signing off...

[alpowolf]

Why do God-fearing people have to tolerate what we see as evil?

What would they do instead?

[BCrago66]

What's the point in linking to the ranting of some semi-literate goober?

[PatriotEdition]

Good one! "Goober"! I like it! Anymore names you want to call me? Why not debate me instead? Ever try that? No. You name-call anyone who does not agree with your socialistic, sick, twisted, liberal mind. One more name-call from you, sir, and you're on my ignore. Billy

[vpintheak]

Don't you know, everything is a right! I want the right to marry my dog, 50 women, and all my cousins. Its a personal choice so the government should stay out of it right?

[BobS]

Lets just use the issue to destroy the democrat party. It seems like a Higher Power wants us to, or else this wouldn't be an issue at such a convenient time.

[JoeFromSidney]

Let's reclaim the word "gay." When Stephen Foster wrote: "tis summer, the darkies are gay," did he mean that in wintertime they were straight? When we sing at Christmas: "don we now our gay apparel," does that mean we're going in drag? I resent the queers hijacking a perfectly good English word, for which there is no adequate substitute, to describe their perverted lifestyle.

[Cinnamon Girl]

Why the small "i", my brother?

[EdReform]

Ping

What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)

The Stamp of Normality

[Devil_Anse]

How well I remember a homosexual man who used to work in the same office I worked in... it was Christmas season, and he would go through the office singing "O Holy Night", and when he'd get to the part that said, "Fall on your knees" he'd raise his voice louder.

They're such funny people, those homosexuals. Every office should have one.

[rogueleader]

Calling gay people "queers" in polite circles is not likely to take off immediately. In time, though, its use is liable to expand.

The extreme radicalism.of the gay-left is pushing the entire gay agenda quickly out of the mainstream.

I just hope we can get the marriage amendment passed before they right the ship and go moderate again. (You know, getting corporations to give gay partners insurance benefits and the like. Anything but marriage.)

[Betaille]

"take a word that used to mean "happy" and change its meaning, i will now refer to "gays" as queers."

Wouldn't it be great if the word "gay" just meant happy again. Imagine if it could be said and there woudlnt even be a snicker, because it would just be another word for happy. Wouldn't it be great if we didnt have to explain to our kids why deviant behavior is glorified on tv? It doesn't have to be like this.

[The Shootist]

Why do God-fearing people have to tolerate what we see as evil?

I dunno. Better ask Osama bin Laden. He has made the same point you have.

[PatriotEdition]

it is just the way i type... i am not looking to get into Yale for on a grammar scholorship. I misspell words all the time. My spelling is atroc... er, terrible... I understand there is spell-check, i don't bother with it. I just come online to get my point across.

By the way, i like Neil Young's music. You a fan?

Billy

[Sodbuster]

"Why do God-fearing people have to tolerate what we see as evil? Why do normal people have to tolerate what we see as sick and abnormal?"

It appears that 'gay' is not the only word that has been corrupted. You are using the word tolerate when you actually mean acquiecse or accommodate. We should tolerate homosexuals as they have the same rights under the law that the rest of us do. But we certainly shouldn't grant them special priviledges such as gay marriage. In other words, we have to tolerate the homosexual community, but we certainly shouldn't have to bend over for them.

[Cinnamon Girl]

Well, there's one song I kinda like... ;)

Did you see this? Marriage of Steve and Mark