Skip to comments.
(Vanity) - Martha Convicted - Bubba Still Walks - WHY??
Self
| 3/08/2004
| Soozla
Posted on 03/08/2004 4:37:43 PM PST by soozla
I have a question for all of you JD'ers (Juris Doctorates).......what is the difference between what Martha did (basically lied to the Feds) and what Bill Clinton did??? Why is she being sent up and he still walks??
There must be some of you who aren't watching the "Charlie's Angels" Movie tonight!
Anyone......anyone.......anyone.........Buehler.....anyone????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: clinton; legal; marthastewart; perjury
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
03/08/2004 4:37:44 PM PST
by
soozla
To: soozla
Martha's jury was 12 ordinary Americans. Bubba's jury was 50 money grubbing politicians.
Anything else. hehe
2
posted on
03/08/2004 4:40:00 PM PST
by
Pokey78
(Steyn: Leftists demonize Wolfowitz because his name begins with a big scary animal and ends Jewishly)
To: soozla
Thats easy.
Martha=evil rich money woman
Clinton=Americas first black president
Plus, it was just about sex, cant we leave his personal life out of it...? /sarcasm
3
posted on
03/08/2004 4:40:41 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Terrence Maculiffe-Ariolimax columbianus (hint- its a gastropod.....)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: JackRyanCIA
The Government does "stings" all the time pretending to be something they are not and trying to trick someone into doing something wrong.
IMO that would be a worse lie.
To: soozla
Sorry. It's Stargate Monday.
6
posted on
03/08/2004 4:53:21 PM PST
by
lizma
To: soozla
There is corruption, arrogance and downright theft on a daily basis with our government, and yet the public is somehow fascinated with Martha Stewart. IMO, the USA (or the media) might wanna step back and gain a *little* perspective.
7
posted on
03/08/2004 4:57:07 PM PST
by
Stew Padasso
(There is rampant corruption and downright theft going on with government on a daily basis, yuet)
To: soozla
Martha was rich and famous
libbers don't like sucessful people
8
posted on
03/08/2004 5:06:47 PM PST
by
Charlespg
To: Charlespg
what are you talking about? Martha is a total liberal & one of their favorites. Liberals are a combination of wealthy elites and their undertrodden little people who carry their water for them. They don't believe the laws apply to them and was why Martha blamed Republican extremists for her prosecution when it was initiated last year.
9
posted on
03/08/2004 5:14:29 PM PST
by
Steven W.
To: soozla
I'm still trying to figure this out.
10
posted on
03/08/2004 5:16:56 PM PST
by
TheSpottedOwl
(Until Kofi Annan rides the Jerusalem RTD....nothing will change.)
To: Pokey78
50? I counted 100. All 100 voted against making it a real trial, with real witnesses and such. All 100.
To: soozla
900 FBI files.
To: doug from upland
ping
13
posted on
03/08/2004 5:44:13 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John F’in Kerry)
To: soozla
The difference?
Clinton was under oath. Martha wasn't.
Does that help?
To: soozla
All people are equal, but some are more equal than others.
15
posted on
03/08/2004 5:45:13 PM PST
by
Sofa King
(MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
To: soozla
Let's see.....
Iraq and Afghanistan showed other dictators what could happen. Libya paid attention. Others may be waiting to see who is President after Nov, 2004.
Could other cases be in the works that might get someone else's attention?????
16
posted on
03/08/2004 6:04:59 PM PST
by
mathluv
(Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
To: soozla
Because Martha only made deals with demons. x42 made deals with Old Scratch Himself.
17
posted on
03/08/2004 6:07:17 PM PST
by
Spruce
(Pres. J.F.Kerry would be an absolute disaster for western civilization.)
To: TheSpottedOwl
"I'm still trying to figure this out."You and me, both......although I think Post #12 Uncle Sausage has about hit the nail on the head and Wingrider's pretty close, too!
I'm confounded, I tell you.....I just don't get it!
18
posted on
03/08/2004 6:47:53 PM PST
by
soozla
("A conservative click Guerilla"-DerSpiegel)
To: nutmeg
Senator Stevenson was correct. They could have had him on tape murdering a woman and he would have walked. The RATS were not going to let the right wing take him down.
It is truly ironic. Had they removed him as they should have, Al and Tipper would be in the White House right now. Of course, had Al been there, we would probably already have about 20 major cities destroyed.
19
posted on
03/08/2004 7:11:38 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: Wingrider
You'd think it'd work out the opposite way, wouldn't you?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson