Skip to comments.
Absence of Evidence is Not Evidence of Absence
US News and World Report ^
| 3/24/04
| Michael Barone
Posted on 03/26/2004 4:47:59 PM PST by XHogPilot
The National Interest
Absence of Evidence is Not Evidence of Absence
"Theres absolutely no evidence that Iraq was supporting al Qaeda," said former White House counterrorism official Richard Clarke to Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes. Its a statement often made by Democrats and critics of the Bush administration.
The problem is its flat out wrong. As CIA Director George Tenet told the Senate Intelligence Committee in October 2002, "We have credible reporting that al Qaeda leaders sought contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire WMD capabilities. The reporting also stated that Iraq has provided training to al Qaeda members in the areas of poisons and gases and making conventional bombs." The Weekly Standards Stephen Hayes has documented copious evidence of ties between al Qaeda and Iraq.
Such evidence is not conclusive. But it is evidence. Clarke and others who state with certainty that we know of no ties between al Qaeda and Saddam Husseins regime are simply wrong. On the basis of the evidence currently available, we cannot know for sure that there was no connection between al Qaeda and Iraq or that Saddam was not connected in some way to the September 11 attacks. And we probably never will know those things for certain.
Policymakers have to make decisions on the basis of incomplete and sometimes fragmentary evidence. When confronted with evidence of ties between al Qaeda and Iraq, those who say there is no evidence fall back on the argument that the evidence is not conclusive. And indeed it is not. But that is no reason not to have taken action against Saddam.
Opponents of that action seem to assume that it should not have been taken unless there was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. But evil regimes are not entitled to a presumption of innocence. The presumption of the moral equality of individuals within a society does not mean that there should be a moral presumption of the moral equality of regimes within the world. Regimes have history, and few regimes have a history of brutality and aggression as stark as that of Saddam. There is no reason to assume that there were no ties between al Qaeda and Saddam just because the evidence of such ties was inconclusive. Absence of evidence, as Donald Rumsfeld has said, is not evidence of absence.
My own guessand it is only thatis that there were ties between al Qaeda and Iraq and that Saddam aided and abetted September 11. I cannot prove that. But no one can prove the opposite either.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq; bush; iraq; kerry; michaelbarone; waronterror; wmd; wot
"The presumption of the moral equality of individuals within a society does not mean that there should be a moral presumption of the moral equality of regimes within the world."A good article centered on a key flaw of Humanism. There is no such thing as "moral equality"...
1
posted on
03/26/2004 4:48:00 PM PST
by
XHogPilot
To: XHogPilot; prairiebreeze
And wasn't the title of this article prairie's tagline for a while?
The evidence that AQ and Iraq had links is beyond dispute. Saddams sons published in their own state-run newspaper how they were working with AQ to defeat America.
2
posted on
03/26/2004 4:54:36 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Peach
Saddams sons published in their own state-run newspaper how they were working with AQ to defeat America. Now that's one I hadn't heard. What was the source for this, can you remember?
To: formercalifornian
We monitored their newspapers and some reporters here reported on it. I don't remember but will go scroll through my Iraq file (which is huge).
4
posted on
03/26/2004 5:01:42 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Peach
Thanks. I know it's not easy.
To: formercalifornian
6
posted on
03/26/2004 5:05:21 PM PST
by
Peach
To: formercalifornian
Saddam's links to AQ. (One of hundreds of articles that link Saddam to AQ that I have).
I'm scrolling through some of them to see the mention about the newspapers. This isn't the one either, but I can tell you that it's been discussed on FNC at least a year ago, probably more. If I don't find it, it won't be
lack of trying, just lack of time to read all the articles to find that one or two sentences contained in them about the boy's newspaper.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/866105/posts
7
posted on
03/26/2004 5:08:39 PM PST
by
Peach
To: formercalifornian
8
posted on
03/26/2004 5:11:14 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Peach
Well, now, this IS interesting. 1999 and UK papers are saying that Saddam promises sanctuary to Bin Laden if he should carry out threats against the West and need safety!. What better way to keep Bin Laden out of a rabbit hole in Iraq than to plug that hole first with a few missiles?
To: formercalifornian
10
posted on
03/26/2004 5:13:56 PM PST
by
Peach
To: formercalifornian
Did you get the link I sent you regarding Saddam's son and their mention of AQ in their state-run newspaper?
I know it could have easily been lost in the "other stuff" I sent you. LOL
11
posted on
03/26/2004 5:21:29 PM PST
by
Peach
To: XHogPilot
Absence of Evidence is Not Evidence of AbsenceThis maxim is equally applicable to the search for WMD in Iraq.
12
posted on
03/26/2004 5:25:18 PM PST
by
SpyGuy
To: Peach
Had to wade through all the preliminary stuff while my son banged away on the piano, but I did find it. Thanks! Very interesting stuff. Somehow, that never made it into the mainstream lib press for some reason. I wondered about the description of judge Gilbert S. Merritt as "a lifelong Democrat and a man of unimpeachable integrity." Seems like an oxymaroon.
To: formercalifornian
LOL.
14
posted on
03/26/2004 5:31:41 PM PST
by
Peach
To: XHogPilot
Should I claim plagiarism? :p (see my tag)
15
posted on
03/26/2004 5:42:01 PM PST
by
Quicksilver
(WMD: absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: SpyGuy
This maxim is equally applicable to the search for WMD in Iraq. Yep. I changed my tag a week or so ago to ...
16
posted on
03/26/2004 5:49:29 PM PST
by
Quicksilver
(WMD: absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: Peach
Thank you, and so many other Freepers, for maintaining subject files ... bump.
17
posted on
03/26/2004 6:57:54 PM PST
by
knarf
(A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
To: Peach
18
posted on
03/26/2004 7:26:28 PM PST
by
GailA
(Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
To: GailA
Thanks for those links. I'll add them to "the file."
19
posted on
03/26/2004 7:27:30 PM PST
by
Peach
To: XHogPilot
"Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence" - how very true and it also applies to Saddam's WMD.
20
posted on
03/26/2004 7:40:48 PM PST
by
DarthMaulrulesok
(Islam is in a clash of civilizations with the West whether we like it or not.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson