Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How 9-11 Happened - Ann Coulter
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | 4/01/04 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 04/01/2004 1:12:47 AM PST by kattracks

We don't need a "commission" to find out how 9-11 happened. The truth is in the timeline:

PRESIDENT CARTER, DEMOCRAT

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter allowed the Shah of Iran to be deposed by a mob of Islamic fanatics. A few months later, Muslims stormed the U.S. Embassy in Iran and took American Embassy staff hostage.

Carter retaliated by canceling Iranian visas. He eventually ordered a disastrous and humiliating rescue attempt, crashing helicopters in the desert.

PRESIDENT REAGAN, REPUBLICAN

The day of Reagan's inauguration, the hostages were released.

In 1982, the U.S. Embassy in Beirut was bombed by Muslim extremists.

President Reagan sent U.S. Marines to Beirut.

In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut were blown up by Muslim extremists.

Reagan said the U.S. would not surrender, but Democrats threw a hissy fit, introducing a resolution demanding that our troops be withdrawn. Reagan caved in to Democrat caterwauling in an election year and withdrew our troops – bombing Syrian-controlled areas on the way out. Democrats complained about that, too.

In 1985, an Italian cruise ship, the Achille Lauro, was seized and a 69-year-old American was shot and thrown overboard by Muslim extremists.

Reagan ordered a heart-stopping mission to capture the hijackers after "the allies" promised them safe passage. In a daring operation, American fighter pilots captured the hijackers and turned them over to the Italians – who then released them to safe harbor in Iraq.

On April 5, 1986, a West Berlin discotheque frequented by U.S. servicemen was bombed by Muslim extremists from the Libyan Embassy in East Berlin, killing an American.

Ten days later, Reagan bombed Libya, despite our dear ally France refusing the use of their airspace. Americans bombed Gadhafi's residence, killing his daughter, and dropped a bomb on the French Embassy "by mistake."

Reagan also stoked a long, bloody war between heinous regimes in Iran and Iraq. All this was while winning a final victory over Soviet totalitarianism.

PRESIDENT BUSH I, MODERATE REPUBLICAN

In December 1988, a passenger jet, Pan Am Flight 103, was bombed over Lockerbie, Scotland, by Muslim extremists.

President-elect George Bush claimed he would continue Reagan's policy of retaliating against terrorism, but did not. Without Reagan to gin her up, even Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher went wobbly, saying there would be no revenge for the bombing.

In 1990, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.

In early 1991, Bush went to war with Iraq. A majority of Democrats opposed the war, and later complained that Bush didn't "finish off the job" with Saddam.

PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, DEMOCRAT

In February 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by Muslim fanatics, killing five people and injuring hundreds.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In October 1993, 18 American troops were killed in a savage firefight in Somalia. The body of one American was dragged through the streets of Mogadishu as the Somalian hordes cheered.

Clinton responded by calling off the hunt for Mohammed Farrah Aidid and ordering our troops home. Osama bin Laden later told ABC News: "The youth ... realized more than before that the American soldier was a paper tiger and after a few blows ran in defeat."

In November 1995, five Americans were killed and 30 wounded by a car bomb in Saudi Arabia set by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In June 1996, a U.S. Air Force housing complex in Saudi Arabia was bombed by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

Months later, Saddam attacked the Kurdish-controlled city of Erbil.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, lobbed some bombs into Iraq hundreds of miles from Saddam's forces.

In November 1997, Iraq refused to allow U.N. weapons inspections to do their jobs and threatened to shoot down a U.S. U-2 spy plane.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In February 1998, Clinton threatened to bomb Iraq, but called it off when the United Nations said no.

On Aug. 7, 1998, U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

On Aug. 20, Monica Lewinsky appeared for the second time to testify before the grand jury.

Clinton responded by bombing Afghanistan and Sudan, severely damaging a camel and an aspirin factory.

On Dec. 16, the House of Representatives prepared to impeach Clinton the next day.

Clinton retaliated by ordering major air strikes against Iraq, described by the New York Times as "by far the largest military action in Iraq since the end of the Gulf War in 1991."

The only time Clinton decided to go to war with anyone in the vicinity of Muslim fanatics was in 1999 – when Clinton attacked Serbians who were fighting Islamic fanatics.

In October 2000, our warship, the USS Cole, was attacked by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, REPUBLICAN

Bush came into office telling his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, he was "tired of swatting flies" – he wanted to eliminate al-Qaida.

On Sept. 11, 2001, when Bush had been in office for barely seven months, 3,000 Americans were murdered in a savage terrorist attack on U.S. soil by Muslim extremists.

Since then, Bush has won two wars against countries that harbored Muslim fanatics, captured Saddam Hussein, immobilized Osama bin Laden, destroyed al-Qaida's base, and begun to create the only functioning democracy in the Middle East other than Israel. Democrats opposed it all – except their phony support for war with Afghanistan, which they immediately complained about and said would be a Vietnam quagmire. And now they claim to be outraged that in the months before 9-11, Bush did not do everything Democrats opposed doing after 9-11.

What a surprise.


Ann Coulter is a bestselling author and syndicated columnist. Her most recent book is Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; 911attacks; afghanistan; alqaeda; alqaida; anncoulter; billclinton; bush; bush2004; bushbashing; bushhassers; bushhaters; carter; clinton; clintonlegacy; coulter; dickclarke; france; georgebush; georgewbush; germany; iran; iranianhostages; iraq; islam; islamofascism; islamofascists; jimmycarter; kangaroocourt; libya; lockerbie; mediabias; memogate; memogate2; memogateii; mocktrial; muslims; nationalsecurity; presidentbush; reagan; religionofpeace; religionofpeacetm; richardclarke; ronaldreagan; smearcampaign; terrorism; terroristbombings; terrorists; usscole; waronterror; wot; wtc1993; wtc2001
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: kattracks
Ann as always has hit the nail on the head. It's all about the democrats and their lack of interest in protecting their country and it's citizens. The blood of 3000+ American citizens is on their hands. God bless our President Bush, God bless America!
41 posted on 04/01/2004 7:44:43 AM PST by Lucky2 (I'm a Born Again Christian, Republican, Conservative and will proudly vote for George W. Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
>In 1979, President Jimmy Carter allowed the Shah of Iran to be deposed by a mob of Islamic fanatics

Well, hell, Truman and
Ike (and everyone else!) let
the Arabs just take

the oil fields British
and US companies built.
Everyone's to blame . . .

42 posted on 04/01/2004 7:45:23 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
I completely agree with you that these have been but battles.

This is why I insist that Iraq be called the BASH.

(Battle Against Saddam Hussein)
43 posted on 04/01/2004 7:49:48 AM PST by AFPhys (My Passion review: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1089021/posts?page=13#13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee
You are completely on target here. This is one of Ann's best columns ever. It will be very useful in demonstrating to any non-socialist what has really happened the past 25 years. Some of the FReeper additions in this thread are very useful in fleshing it out, too.
44 posted on 04/01/2004 7:52:00 AM PST by AFPhys (My Passion review: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1089021/posts?page=13#13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
That loveable little tart can write.

Required reading for all potential voters in 2004.

Do your part, Freepers - distribute to everyone you know.
45 posted on 04/01/2004 8:06:12 AM PST by Stallone (Guess who Al Qaeda wants to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
an interesting trio here


46 posted on 04/01/2004 8:10:20 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
OKC Blast Linked To bin
Laden - FBI Refused To
Accept Evidence
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22122
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
3-21-1

A former investigative reporter for the NBC affiliate in Oklahoma City last night told Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly she has gathered massive evidence of a foreign conspiracy involving Saudi terrorist leader Osama bin Laden in the 1995 bombing of the federal building that killed 168 people.

Jayna Davis, former reporter for KFOR-TV in Oklahoma City, says she took her evidence -- including hundreds of court records, 24 sworn witness statements and reports from law enforcement, intelligence and terror experts -- to the FBI, which refused even to accept the material.

Two men were convicted of murder and conspiracy charges in the bombing -- Timothy McVeigh, who faces execution May 16, and Terry Nichols, who yesterday asked that Oklahoma charges against him be dismissed as he has already been convicted in federal court.

Nichols, 45, is serving a life prison sentence for his federal conviction on eight involuntary manslaughter counts and conspiracy for the April 19, 1995, bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. State prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Nichols. But defense attorneys said yesterday constitutional protection against double jeopardy bars the state from seeking the death penalty.

Davis said federal authorities investigating the bombing decided early on in the probe that the blast was the result of a domestic conspiracy, not a foreign one, ignoring all evidence to the contrary.

She said a Middle East terrorist cell was in operation only blocks from the federal building, and that an Iraqi national who formerly served in Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard was in contact with McVeigh the day of the bombing. She said this suspect arrived at the crime scene in a Ryder truck moments before the blast and sped away in a brown Chevrolet pickup truck immediately after.

An all-points bulletin was issued for this suspect, but was later withdrawn inexplicably.

Davis said her evidence indicates a conspiracy involving McVeigh, Nichols and at least seven men of Middle Eastern ethnic background. She called bin Laden the mastermind of the conspiracy.

"The evidence we have gathered definitely implicates McVeigh and Nichols," she said. "I want to make that very clear. They were in it up to their eyeballs."

Davis also points to court records offered in the Nichols defense that suggest he had contacts with a member of bin Laden's terrorist organization in the Philippines prior to the bombing.

When she took her hundreds of pages of documentation of conspiracy in the bombing to the FBI, Davis said agents "turned me away and refused to take my statements."

"I was flabbergasted," she told O'Reilly. "I am unable to imagine any reason they would not accept it."


47 posted on 04/01/2004 8:11:08 AM PST by Stallone (Guess who Al Qaeda wants to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

48 posted on 04/01/2004 8:17:25 AM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stallone
For 15 years now, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has known with certainty that terrorists use center fuel tanks to destroy passenger planes.

In 1989, according to the NTSB, terrorists destroyed an Avianca Airlines jet by placing a small bomb over the center fuel tank. The methodology relies on a terrorist smuggling a small amount of plastic or liquid explosive inside a passenger jet. The bomb is then detonated in a row of seats located near the center of the plane, immediately over the fuel tank.

While it is extremely rare to ignite aviation fuel with a mere spark (to this day, NTSB investigators cannot explain the source of ignition that caused the presumably accidental explosion of TWA Flight 800 in 1996), the energy from even a small amount of high explosives will initiate a catastrophic explosion of the fuel tank. The bomb works best when it is a shaped charge that channels its explosive energy down through the floor of the aircraft directly into the tank. This is the effect Richard Reid had in mind when he boarded American Airlines Flight 63 with explosives laced to his feet.

Al Qaeda has experimented with this technique for attacking 747 aircraft. Pakistani-born terrorist Ramzi Youssef, who is now in prison for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, planned to blow up a dozen U.S. jumbo jets on a single day using bombs over center fuel tanks. To calibrate the precise amount of explosive needed, Youssef conducted a test bombing on a Philippine Airlines jet.

Fortunately, he and his co-conspirators were foiled after a fire in their Manila safehouse resulted in authorities detecting their plot to blow up passenger planes on trans-Pacific routes before it could be put into effect. It was in this same safehouse that Filipino security services found documents outlining plans to crash aircraft into government buildings in Washington.

Some experts believe that TWA 800 was actually destroyed by a bomb of this type rather than by the accidental ignition of the center fuel tank.

According to Larry Johnson, a former CIA and State Department counter-terrorism official who participated in the Pan Am Flight 103 probe, an FBI official told him that Youssef claimed in 1996 that al Qaeda had destroyed TWA 800. Approximately 5 percent of the wreckage of TWA 800 -- some eight tons of the plane, equivalent to a mid-sized cargo truck -- has never been recovered. Mr. Johnson told me that the Pan Am 103 aircraft pieces, which bore evidence of a bomb attack, were "small enough to fit on top of a table." The precise source of the explosion of TWA 800 -- whether a bomb, a missile or malfunctioning equipment -- has never been identified and may never be known.

49 posted on 04/01/2004 8:21:46 AM PST by Stallone (Guess who Al Qaeda wants to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Stallone
For 15 years now, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has known with certainty that terrorists use center fuel tanks to destroy passenger planes.

In 1989, according to the NTSB, terrorists destroyed an Avianca Airlines jet by placing a small bomb over the center fuel tank. The methodology relies on a terrorist smuggling a small amount of plastic or liquid explosive inside a passenger jet. The bomb is then detonated in a row of seats located near the center of the plane, immediately over the fuel tank.

While it is extremely rare to ignite aviation fuel with a mere spark (to this day, NTSB investigators cannot explain the source of ignition that caused the presumably accidental explosion of TWA Flight 800 in 1996), the energy from even a small amount of high explosives will initiate a catastrophic explosion of the fuel tank. The bomb works best when it is a shaped charge that channels its explosive energy down through the floor of the aircraft directly into the tank. This is the effect Richard Reid had in mind when he boarded American Airlines Flight 63 with explosives laced to his feet.

Al Qaeda has experimented with this technique for attacking 747 aircraft. Pakistani-born terrorist Ramzi Youssef, who is now in prison for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, planned to blow up a dozen U.S. jumbo jets on a single day using bombs over center fuel tanks. To calibrate the precise amount of explosive needed, Youssef conducted a test bombing on a Philippine Airlines jet.

Fortunately, he and his co-conspirators were foiled after a fire in their Manila safehouse resulted in authorities detecting their plot to blow up passenger planes on trans-Pacific routes before it could be put into effect. It was in this same safehouse that Filipino security services found documents outlining plans to crash aircraft into government buildings in Washington.

Some experts believe that TWA 800 was actually destroyed by a bomb of this type rather than by the accidental ignition of the center fuel tank.

According to Larry Johnson, a former CIA and State Department counter-terrorism official who participated in the Pan Am Flight 103 probe, an FBI official told him that Youssef claimed in 1996 that al Qaeda had destroyed TWA 800. Approximately 5 percent of the wreckage of TWA 800 -- some eight tons of the plane, equivalent to a mid-sized cargo truck -- has never been recovered. Mr. Johnson told me that the Pan Am 103 aircraft pieces, which bore evidence of a bomb attack, were "small enough to fit on top of a table." The precise source of the explosion of TWA 800 -- whether a bomb, a missile or malfunctioning equipment -- has never been identified and may never be known.

50 posted on 04/01/2004 8:23:00 AM PST by Stallone (Guess who Al Qaeda wants to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mathluv
Thanks; Credit Mark Steyn for the tagline, and University of North Carolina for the photo (which was apparently taken somewhere around January '03.)
51 posted on 04/01/2004 8:32:13 AM PST by kingu (Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: xp38
Alright. I recognize Drudge and Ann but who is the other one? Ann's legs look especially skinny in this picture.
52 posted on 04/01/2004 9:28:37 AM PST by GmbyMan (Bush-Cheney 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GmbyMan
My first guess was Leslie Stahl of 60 minutes but I'm not certain now. You are right about Drudge though. Hopefully someone who does know for sure can identify her better than I.
53 posted on 04/01/2004 10:07:35 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Stillwaters
ping
54 posted on 04/01/2004 10:13:42 AM PST by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GmbyMan
The woman on the left is almost certainly Peggy Noonan.
55 posted on 04/01/2004 10:14:52 AM PST by Remole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
Would it be appropriate to call it the war against Militant Islamic Fundamentalism?
56 posted on 04/01/2004 10:20:24 AM PST by Seamus Mc Gillicuddy (TAP, RACK, BANG! NO MAGGIE'S DRAWERS HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: txzman
Triple amen. This is probably Ann's best column ever.
57 posted on 04/01/2004 10:21:57 AM PST by Wolfstar (Yo, "real" conservatives. Spain's election is clear. Jihadists are on Kerry's side. Are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911
I was going so what until I read #7.
Loch Ness is one cold sucker.
58 posted on 04/01/2004 10:25:19 AM PST by macrahanish #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xp38
Is that Peggy Noonan on the left there?
59 posted on 04/01/2004 10:25:27 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson