I call for an Investigation of OKC Bombing cover up!

The Third Terrorist ^ | April 2004 | Jayna Davis

[OPS4]

Thanks for the info.
Ops4 God Bless America!

[Broadside Joe]

No problem. I pinged the other thread

[auggy]

If, you need further proof to this accusation, visit Drudge. The Bush administration has been withholding 75% of Clinton' files related to terrorism. Clinton's aides and the congressional committee, want to know why.

[Richard Kimball]

TWA 800 also. Clinton used OKC as his Riechstag fire.

[GBA]

"The Bush administration has an even bigger incentive to cover up any foreign connection to these terrorist attacks in the 1990s than the Clinton administration does."

Why do you say that? What incentive?

[Richard Kimball]

Riechstag=Reichstag, too much coffee this morning.

[Swordmaker]

mark for later attention

[GBA]

"The Bush administration has been withholding 75% of Clinton' files related to terrorism. Clinton's aides and the congressional committee, want to know why."

I'm hoping it's a trap for the Dems. By holding on to the files, I think the Bush admin is trying to generate a lot of noise to have these files released. My hope is that the information is particularly damaging for the Clinton administration. To release in an election year, even if it's the Commission calling for it, it might still look like a partisan attack on Clinton and the Dems.

By trying to hold on to them until they cave under political and public pressure, they remove the appearance of partisanship that tainted the Monica "it's only sex" case and various rape charges/investigations that the Republicans presided over.

[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

Agreed, McVeigh probably took a lot of info to the grave. The clinton years started with Waco and Foster, went through OKC, and ended with TWA 800 and Elian Gonzalez. No doubt there are some unconnected dots through all of these threads.

[OPS4]

And also the defense of Kosovo muslim drug lords?
Why?
Ops4 God Bless america!

[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

I don't claim to have the answer to your question, but it did have the same "odor" associated with it that all the other clinton fiascos seemed to have - the "Dayton accords" were negotiated by presenting the Serbs a list of impossible demands and there was never a good reason given for us getting involved. I clearly remember clinton (and others) making a big deal out of saying "Kosovah" instead of "Kosovo". Apparently this is the difference between the Serb and the Albanian pronunciation.

http://slate.msn.com/default.aspx?id=1002483

Clinton doing this was as transparently phony as everything else that pathological liar ever did.

[auggy]

"I'm hoping it's a trap for the Dems. By holding on to the files"

Good thinking!

I never gave that a thought. That would also be good thinking on Bush's part. I hope that is the case. It is hard to believe that Clinton had done a better job of fighting terrorism, than W. Bush, and that would be the reason for not releasing them.

It's also hard to believe Bush would be protecting Clinton, after what the Dems have done to him.

[Alberta's Child]

Why do you say that? What incentive?

Because if it turns out that Iraq was behind all of the terrorist attacks in the U.S. from 1993-2001, then it basically cost the United States 4,000+ civilian lives to restore a royal family to the throne in Kuwait in 1991. If that were the case, then George H. W. Bush would go down in history as the worst president this country has ever elected.

[iopscusa]

DA assumption that w/o GulfWarI the attacks would not have happened....so smack a mole policy vs.Islamisissies & Sadamn will work?

[DLfromthedesert]

So these "Peace and Justice" people want to do in the Iraqis after they have been screwed by Saddam all these years?

And this will serve what purpose other than feeding the greed and vengeance of these families?

[tall_tex]

Bump, till after supper, sorry wife is yelling at me.