Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Win, Specter Looks To Fall Election (already distancing himself from Bush)
Associated Press | April 29, 2004 | Lara Jakes Jordon

Posted on 04/29/2004 6:27:24 AM PDT by Russ

Apr 28, 4:50 PM EDT

After Win, Specter Looks to Fall Election

By LARA JAKES JORDAN Associated Press Writer

PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- After surviving a close scrape in the Republican primary, Sen. Arlen Specter turned his attention to the fall contest and began a campaign Wednesday that could put him at odds with the White House that helped him pull through.

The four-term moderate narrowly defeated conservative Rep. Pat Toomey, 51 percent to 49 percent, in Tuesday's primary after Toomey branded Specter as too liberal. The race was perhaps the most serious challenge yet to any Senate incumbent this season.

Specter will face Democratic Rep. Joe Hoeffel in November.

Less than a day after his primary victory, Specter touted his efforts to trim tax cuts, retain overtime pay for workers, resist school vouchers and continue embryonic stem-cell research - all in opposition to President Bush. The four-term Republican also called the situation in Iraq a "tinderbox" that could be a problem for the president in the fall elections.

"I intend to retain my independent voice, a voice I have always had," Specter said. "The 12 million people of Pennsylvania have not elected me to be a rubber stamp, and I will speak out where I think the necessity calls for it."

Despite his policy differences with the president, Specter said Bush's public support was key to his victory over Toomey. The race was so tight, he said, that the usually stoic Specter could not "stop my nervous system from gyrating a little" while watching vote tallies roll in.

Hoeffel, meanwhile, embarked on a 19-stop tour to raise his low statewide profile. The three-term suburban Philadelphia lawmaker predicted that Specter moved too far to the right in the Republican race to be successful in November.

"This primary has demonstrated that Arlen Specter is not the senator that he used to be," Hoeffel said. "He used to be a moderate maverick, but he is neither of those things. He's voting for a Republican program in Washington that's not working in Pennsylvania. He's their senator now - not ours."

The Democrats blasted Specter as a "political opportunist."

"He has taken every side of every issue for no other reason than to protect his political hide," said Brad Woodhouse, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "He owes his political survival to George Bush, and he's now stuck with him and his right-wing policies."

Registered Democratic voters outnumber Republicans in Pennsylvania by nearly 389,000.

Specter has long enjoyed support within liberal-leaning unions and abortion-rights groups, and predicted he would attract Democrats and independents. He said he could help Bush in the fall by pulling moderates to the GOP ticket.

"My agreements with the president are more extensive than my disagreements," Specter said.

Specter spent $10 million to win the primary. As of April 7, he had $4.5 million in his campaign bank account to Hoeffel's $800,000.

That makes Specter tough to beat in November, said Wilkes University political scientist Thomas J. Baldino.

Specter's near-loss "will give Hoeffel some hope," Baldino said. "But as bad a beating as Specter took in term of his reputation, he will continue to raise and spend enough money to demonstrate he can win."

---

.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2004; election; electionussenate; specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-376 next last
To: Owen
Owen, you are 100% correct, and don't let them convince you otherwise.
61 posted on 04/29/2004 7:02:16 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
we both know thats wrong, but what is one to assume???
62 posted on 04/29/2004 7:02:17 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: gdc61
That Bush and Santorum, and Toomey for that matter, are more concerned with making sure that they can win a floor vote than winning a committee vote?

Bush and Santorum could easily change the make up of the judiciary committee by giving Specter some worthless promotion elsewhere. However, a no vote on the floor is a no vote on the floor, and Hoeffel is a guaranteed no vote.
63 posted on 04/29/2004 7:04:39 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: gdc61
I don't know what I'm going to do yet. This was a tough loss and I'm really pissed at Bush and Santorum. But I will not vote for the dem!
64 posted on 04/29/2004 7:05:10 AM PDT by stevio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
and after we pick up 3 more seats in the south all that you just said is moot. and if we lose a Pa. seat it won't even matter except that Specter will be gone.
65 posted on 04/29/2004 7:07:56 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
And what makes you think Specter will lose his chairmanship, other than wishful thinking? Hmmmm?
With him as chiarman, Hoeffel won't have to vote "no". Specter will see to it that he can comfortably vote "yes".
66 posted on 04/29/2004 7:08:09 AM PDT by PA BOOKEND
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: stevio
then write in Toomey. thats what some here have said they would do.
67 posted on 04/29/2004 7:08:54 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: stevio
Vote for the Scottish shitbag.

He's vile, but you'll get 30-40% good votes out him. You'll get 0-1% out of the Dem.

68 posted on 04/29/2004 7:09:46 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PA BOOKEND
If the senate is a lock, I might write Toomey in too. The more I read of this the madder I get at the Specter voters, especially the conservative ones.
69 posted on 04/29/2004 7:09:48 AM PDT by stevio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: gdc61
Wrong again GDC.

If Republicans can win 55 Senate seats by holding Pennsylvania and picking up those three Southern states you mention, then we can add one more member to every committee. That would make Specter's vote moot since in a tie, it goes to the floor.
71 posted on 04/29/2004 7:14:55 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PA BOOKEND
Because I saw George Bush dump Trent Lott when Lott became an obstacle to his agenda.
72 posted on 04/29/2004 7:15:40 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PA BOOKEND
I don't think you understand how unprecedented that episode was.
73 posted on 04/29/2004 7:16:09 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dead
you don't get it, specters "maybe vote" is not needed! we are going to pick up at LEAST 2 more seats in the senate so tossing specter is a WIN!!
74 posted on 04/29/2004 7:16:11 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Owen
No. It won't. You know it won't.

I'm one of those naive types who think American conservatism has something to offer for everyone, if the party would bother promoting it. But your right - if the party isn't willing to sell conservative principles it will never win in those states.

Hell eventually conservatism won't be able to win in any state.

76 posted on 04/29/2004 7:16:50 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: gdc61
Jim Jeffords - Welcome to Free Republic!
77 posted on 04/29/2004 7:20:56 AM PDT by Solson (Conservatives are concerned with the'end'; Liberals about the 'means' and the 'particulars.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Owen; republicanwizard
How can Specter win if he does not appeal to at least a segment of the Dems?

Does the term "Reagan Democrat" ring a bell? How did Santorum win?

78 posted on 04/29/2004 7:21:10 AM PDT by The kings dead (O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gdc61
I want Kyl in as chairman of Judiciary too. Badly. But not at the price of a Hoeffel. He's dangerous.
79 posted on 04/29/2004 7:22:53 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Hoeffel may not head the Judiciary Committee, but if a Republican majority isn't preserved, another Dem will.

So it's the certainty of a pro-abort chairing the committee if Specter wins versus the possibility of a pro-abort chairing the committee if Specter loses.

80 posted on 04/29/2004 7:23:02 AM PDT by The kings dead (O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson