Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN inspectors: Saddam shipped out WMD before war and after
WorldTribune.com ^ | 6/11/04

Posted on 06/11/2004 1:17:07 PM PDT by freebilly

The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.

The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission briefed the Security Council on new findings that could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile and WMD program.

The briefing contained satellite photographs that demonstrated the speed with which Saddam dismantled his missile and WMD sites before and during the war. Council members were shown photographs of a ballistic missile site outside Baghdad in May 2003, and then saw a satellite image of the same location in February 2004, in which facilities had disappeared.

UNMOVIC acting executive chairman Demetrius Perricos told the council on June 9 that "the only controls at the borders are for the weight of the scrap metal, and to check whether there are any explosive or radioactive materials within the scrap," Middle East Newsline reported.

"It's being exported," Perricos said after the briefing. "It's being traded out. And there is a large variety of scrap metal from very new to very old, and slowly, it seems the country is depleted of metal."

"The removal of these materials from Iraq raises concerns with regard to proliferation risks," Perricos told the council. Perricos also reported that inspectors found Iraqi WMD and missile components shipped abroad that still contained UN inspection tags.

He said the Iraqi facilities were dismantled and sent both to Europe and around the Middle East. at the rate of about 1,000 tons of metal a month. Destionations included Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey.

The Baghdad missile site contained a range of WMD and dual-use components, UN officials said. They included missile components, reactor vessel and fermenters – the latter required for the production of chemical and biological warheads.

"It raises the question of what happened to the dual-use equipment, where is it now and what is it being used for," Ewen Buchanan, Perricos's spokesman, said. "You can make all kinds of pharmaceutical and medicinal products with a fermenter. You can also use it to breed anthrax."

The UNMOVIC report said Iraqi missiles were dismantled and exported to such countries as Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey. In the Dutch city of Rotterdam, an SA-2 surface-to-air missile, one of at least 12, was discovered in a junk yard, replete with UN tags. In Jordan, UN inspectors found 20 SA-2 engines as well as components for solid-fuel for missiles.

"The problem for us is that we don't know what may have passed through these yards and other yards elsewhere," Buchanan said. "We can't really assess the significance and don't know the full extent of activity that could be going on there or with others of Iraq's neighbors."

UN inspectors have assessed that the SA-2 and the short-range Al Samoud surface-to-surface missile were shipped abroad by agents of the Saddam regime. Buchanan said UNMOVIC plans to inspect other sites, including in Turkey.

In April, International Atomic Energy Agency director-general Mohammed El Baradei said material from Iraqi nuclear facilities were being smuggled out of the country.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alsamoud; alsamoudmissile; alsamoudmissiles; axisofweasels; biochemical; blixperplexed; buchanan; demetriusperricos; dualuse; engines; ewenbuchanan; fermenter; fermenters; inspectors; jordan; junkyard; junkyards; missileengines; mojosayshi; perricos; reactorvessel; rotterdam; sa2; sa2missile; sa2missiles; saddam; scrap; scrapmetal; scrapyard; scrapyards; shellgame; slavage; terror; thenetherlands; turkey; un; unmovic; unmvic; untags; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-208 next last

1 posted on 06/11/2004 1:17:08 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff; Coop; swarthyguy; oceanview; Shermy; hchutch

Guess Bush was right after all..


2 posted on 06/11/2004 1:19:11 PM PDT by Dog (In Memory of Pat Tillman ---- ---- ---- American Hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

So the Iraqis didn't have the WMD programs, but dismantled them anyway. Makes sense to me...


3 posted on 06/11/2004 1:19:19 PM PDT by dirtboy (John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

What WMD?


4 posted on 06/11/2004 1:19:43 PM PDT by love n hate tattoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

paging Mr. Hans Blix, Mr. Hans Blix....


5 posted on 06/11/2004 1:19:58 PM PDT by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

That can't possibly be right. After all, the UN swore saddaam had no WMDs.


6 posted on 06/11/2004 1:20:12 PM PDT by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

But.. but.. the UN SAID that stuff wasn't there!
They couldn't have lied or spoke too soon, could they?
/ barf.

Wonder how long until the spin begins, if it hasn't already?


7 posted on 06/11/2004 1:20:23 PM PDT by Darksheare (enthusiasm + energy * willpower / time available = probability of trouble/discovery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: love n hate tattoo

You know, the ones he used before and killed people with. Those WMD.


8 posted on 06/11/2004 1:20:39 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Where'dja s'pose they got those satellite photos?


9 posted on 06/11/2004 1:21:07 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Wouldn't want to get between that story and Dan Rathers chance to spread the word. LOL


10 posted on 06/11/2004 1:21:45 PM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
So the Iraqis didn't have the WMD programs, but dismantled them anyway. Makes sense to me...

John Kerry was the head of the WMD program in Iraq?

11 posted on 06/11/2004 1:21:47 PM PDT by danneskjold ("Somebody is behind this..." - George Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Where is the reference to Blix not being able to find these?


12 posted on 06/11/2004 1:22:01 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Wonder how long until the spin begins, if it hasn't already?

And of course this will all end up being President Bush's fault. WMD in Iraq? How was it that he knew and did not act even sooner? What did he know and when did he know it? yadda yadda yadda.

13 posted on 06/11/2004 1:22:15 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Where'dja s'pose they got those satellite photos? From the French, of course!
14 posted on 06/11/2004 1:22:45 PM PDT by azsportsterman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Wonder how long until the spin begins, if it hasn't already?

I don't think they'll want to spin this one. Instead, each revelation will be blandly reported deep within newspapers and newscasts as to draw as little attention as possible - or completely ignored when that can be accomplished.

15 posted on 06/11/2004 1:22:56 PM PDT by dirtboy (John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski

Don't bother - Blix wouldn't be able to find the white courtesy phone anyway.


16 posted on 06/11/2004 1:23:27 PM PDT by michaelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Well, now.


17 posted on 06/11/2004 1:23:49 PM PDT by SandyInSeattle (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
Interesting that this is coming now from the U.N. I'm sure it's accurate... but I just find the timing really interesting. We bite the bullet and okay a resolution that gives the U.N. some sort of power (if not just ceremonial power) in Iraq.... and the U.N. inspectors start talking about what the dems say we lied about Iraq having.

One thing is for sure... our administration's guys are no dummies.

18 posted on 06/11/2004 1:23:52 PM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

You missed their update the other day. They now say Saddam had WMD, but they were all destroyed. So I guess this new UN stance is the change to the change.


19 posted on 06/11/2004 1:24:46 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; new cruelty
Admittedly, I can see that both are likely, either saying the tired old "Bush's fault" as they have done repeatedly, or reporting it in one paragraph 'wire service' reports on page 23c in the boondocks of the newspapers and backwoods of the late night news.
20 posted on 06/11/2004 1:25:06 PM PDT by Darksheare (enthusiasm + energy * willpower / time available = probability of trouble/discovery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

"Perricos also reported that inspectors found Iraqi WMD and missile components shipped abroad that still contained UN inspection tags."

So.....the UN inspectors tagged all the WMD before they didn't find them? Maybe Mr. Kerry could explain this to me.


21 posted on 06/11/2004 1:26:09 PM PDT by mad puppy (May God continue to bless Ron and Nancy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

Crud!
Yeah, I missed that.
Wonder how they explain the mix in flight Sarin artillery shell, it wasn't destroyed until it was set off as an IED.
If all the WMD were destroyed asthey claim, that shell wouldn't have ben there.
*slaps forehead*
Nevermind, I just remembered -their stance now is that Sarin isn't a WMD.
Hoo-boy, this is gonna be a fun ride it seems.


22 posted on 06/11/2004 1:27:09 PM PDT by Darksheare (enthusiasm + energy * willpower / time available = probability of trouble/discovery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
The Baghdad missile site contained a range of WMD and dual-use components, UN officials said. They included missile components, reactor vessel and fermenters – the latter required for the production of chemical and biological warheads.

"It raises the question of what happened to the dual-use equipment, where is it now and what is it being used for,"

That's what I'd like to know. We don't need this stuff to fall into the hands of terrorists, IF it hasn't already.

23 posted on 06/11/2004 1:27:33 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (I am a nobody, and nobody is perfect; therefore, I am perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

This of course is old news, Israeli intelligence knew about this literally within hours after it happened.


24 posted on 06/11/2004 1:27:46 PM PDT by jpl ("America's greatest chapter is still to be written, for the best is yet to come." - Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Gonna be a lot of egg on a lot of face but the mission is to FIND them.


25 posted on 06/11/2004 1:28:00 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

C'mon...this is debka, right?


26 posted on 06/11/2004 1:28:04 PM PDT by Huck (We miss you Ronnie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danneskjold

LOL


27 posted on 06/11/2004 1:30:06 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Ping!


28 posted on 06/11/2004 1:30:23 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (I am a nobody, and nobody is perfect; therefore, I am perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dog; FairOpinion; Battle Axe; Allan; Mitchell; TrebleRebel; okie01; lainie; MizSterious; piasa; ...
Guess Bush was right after all..

And so was David Kay. As far as I have seen he has never contradicted this statement:

Saddam's WMD hidden in Syria, says Iraq survey chief The Sunday Telegraph (UK) 1/25/04 Con Coughlin

"David Kay, the former head of the coalition's hunt for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, yesterday claimed that part of Saddam Hussein's secret weapons programme was hidden in Syria.

In an exclusive interview with The Telegraph, Dr Kay, who last week resigned as head of the Iraq Survey Group, said that he had uncovered evidence that unspecified materials had been moved to Syria shortly before last year's war to overthrow Saddam.

"We are not talking about a large stockpile of weapons," he said. "But we know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD programme. Precisely what went to Syria, and what has happened to it, is a major issue that needs to be resolved."

And maybe someone can follow up with Kay on this one:

Saddam Behind Anthrax Attacks? Accuracy In Media ^ | January 1, 2004 | Cliff Kincaid

"In a major development, potentially as significant as the capture of Saddam Hussein, investigative journalist Richard Miniter says there is evidence to indicate Saddam’s anthrax program was capable of producing the kind of anthrax that hit America shortly after 9/11. Miniter, author of Losing bin Laden, told Accuracy in Media that during November he interviewed U.S. weapons inspector Dr. David Kay in Baghdad and that he was "absolutely shocked and astonished" at the sophistication of the Iraqi program.

Miniter said that Kay told him that, "the Iraqis had developed new techniques for drying and milling anthrax—techniques that were superior to anything the United States or the old Soviet Union had. That would make the former regime of Saddam Hussein the most sophisticated manufacturer of anthrax in the world."

Just asking...
29 posted on 06/11/2004 1:30:44 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freebilly; hannityforpres08; BrokenArrow

Ping


30 posted on 06/11/2004 1:32:02 PM PDT by My back yard ("I may be slow, but I'm miles ahead of you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azsportsterman
From the French, of course!

Heck, those weren't photos, those were sales receipts.

31 posted on 06/11/2004 1:33:12 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
They had WMDs before they didn't have them.
32 posted on 06/11/2004 1:33:17 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Freepmail me if you'd like to read one of my Christian historical romance novels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.


33 posted on 06/11/2004 1:33:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly; All

WMD in Iraq,... you're f#($! kidding me...Can we just focus on something else besides WMD 24/7, ... "There is other news", like those steamy photos of panty cladded iraqi prisoners ... they "got very short shrift this week."

hmm?... what's that?

Oh, we're on... ahem...

34 posted on 06/11/2004 1:36:48 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

^


35 posted on 06/11/2004 1:37:29 PM PDT by jla (http://www.ronaldreaganmemorial.com/memorial_fund.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy
Given the chronic dishonesty of the UN, now you see it and now you don't, your suggestion that John Kerry should explain the situation is spot on. The UN boils down to two points: trust them with security and hundreds of thousands of people will get killed; trust them with money and hindreds of millions of dollars will get stolen.

Then ask them what happened, and they will lie through their teeth to cover their *sses. Who does Kofi Annan think he is, Bill Clinton?

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Three Americans: Ronald Reagan, George Soros, Aurel deHollan."

If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.

36 posted on 06/11/2004 1:38:01 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Will someone please e-mail this to O'Reilly. I am so tired of his harping on the error of the WMD.


37 posted on 06/11/2004 1:39:48 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

First they go and pick that undead looking freak of a loser for a candidate... then its wall-to-wall coverage of Reagan, Reagan, Reagan... and now this... WMD bull$#!+.... I'm telling you dave... its just a lot to take... tissue please.

38 posted on 06/11/2004 1:39:50 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
photographs of a ballistic missile site outside Baghdad in May 2003, and then saw a satellite image of the same location in February 2004, in which facilities had disappeared.

Correct me if I am wrong, but weren't we in charge of those areas (more or less) during this time period? And if we were and knew about these missiles, why did we let them take them apart under our noses? Something doesn't look right here.

39 posted on 06/11/2004 1:40:07 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Freepers --- get this on every talk show in the nation. Get it to newspaper editors. Make them write the story.


40 posted on 06/11/2004 1:41:31 PM PDT by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan

ping


41 posted on 06/11/2004 1:43:48 PM PDT by marblehead17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

I believe the issue of the WMDs is the single biggest problem Bush has faced. He played this issue too straight and too lawyerly and was not aggressive enough. The issue should have always been framed that we don't know where Saddam put them rather than whether they existed at all. I think his handling of this issue (and its still not too late) is one of the single most impacting factors on whether he wins in Nov. If a large cache were found, Bush wins hands down. If we continue to get dribs and drabs, then its still in play like its been.


42 posted on 06/11/2004 1:43:56 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Yo, Dan Rather. You wanted to cover other news? Here ya go, Bub. And there's still time to get in on the Evening News.


43 posted on 06/11/2004 1:50:42 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Of course the next Dem/media response will be:

"So if you knew the WMD existed, why didn't you prevent their smuggling of it out? Now your botching of the war effort has made it worse, spreading the underground proliferation when before the war at least it was 'contained' in Iraq."


44 posted on 06/11/2004 1:58:27 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat (In 10 minutes Lady Thatcher has knocked down 10+ years of media myths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
What or who exactly is the World Tribune? Is this being reported elsewhere?
45 posted on 06/11/2004 2:01:08 PM PDT by hankbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
I just spoke with UNMOVIC
I went to their web site, found the phone number and called them myself. The guy said the inspection team found about 20 SA-2 missile engines (or something like that) in Jordan. And the report over the past week that a bunch of Iraqi weaponry metal was found in a junkyard in the Netherlands was part of the UNMOVIC report, too.

The 15-page quarterly report, PDF file format, can be found here:

Slam Dunk: Iraq did have WMDs, but Dan Rather doesn't really care

By the way, the gentleman I spoke to regarding the report was very polite...he answered my questions without any apparent political agenda (though I suspect, being a U.N.er, he is liberal). He did say they suspect most of the material was taken away after the war was pretty much over last year. I commented that this wasn't really making much news, and he said the L.A. Slimes and the New York Slimes had reported on it.

I was just amazed how David Kay's "we were all wrong" comment got front page, 3-days of coverage....and this vindicating report gets scant attention.

If you want to speak to UNMOVIC, here is the number: 212-963-3022. Please, be polite. The guy was very accomodating and seemed quite knowledgeable regarding the matter. I didn't get a name.

46 posted on 06/11/2004 2:01:47 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly; kdf1; AMERIKA; Lancey Howard; MudPuppy; SMEDLEYBUTLER; opbuzz; Snow Bunny; gitmogrunt; ..

major BUSH WAS RIGHT bump...again...


47 posted on 06/11/2004 2:02:55 PM PDT by RaceBannon (God Bless Ronald Reagan, and may America Bless God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Good for you for calling!


48 posted on 06/11/2004 2:04:32 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hankbrown
I called UNMOVIC myself...the guy who answered the phone was very helpful and told me straight out what the report contains. See my earlier post.

ANYONE out there have SEE BS Snooze's phone numbers?? Let's call those jackals and ask if they're going to do a report on WMDs being FOUND.

49 posted on 06/11/2004 2:06:18 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dog

its still going to be hard to make the case, because the media has cemented the "no WMD" reality so hard - that its going to be hard to dislodge, an uphill battle.


50 posted on 06/11/2004 2:06:34 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson