Please PING yourn high-volume lists :)
1 posted on
06/15/2004 7:20:07 AM PDT by
jmstein7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Dales
2 posted on
06/15/2004 7:21:10 AM PDT by
jmstein7
(A Judge not bound to the original intent of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
To: jmstein7
You mean we aren't already boycotting them
To: jmstein7; 8mmMauser; Acela; afterhoursguru; AlextheWise1; AniGrrl; arepublicifyoucankeepit; ...
7 posted on
06/15/2004 7:44:30 AM PDT by
SheLion
(Please register to vote! We can't afford to remain silent!!)
To: jmstein7
Done. I used almost the exact verbiage of the post, changed to "YOU" from "HE".
10 posted on
06/15/2004 7:51:43 AM PDT by
ExSoldier
(When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic.)
To: jmstein7
did something happen lately to bring this on?
11 posted on
06/15/2004 7:59:19 AM PDT by
isom35
To: jmstein7
Why ask him to ut his money where his mouth is when his foot is already there?
14 posted on
06/15/2004 8:04:18 AM PDT by
rintense
(Screw justice. I want revenge.)
To: jmstein7
Send this recent poll bias by the lying and vile LA Slimes to BOR:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1153822/posts
TWISTED: LA Times Poll Had Sample With 38% Democrats, 25% Republicans Tue Jun 15 2004 10:13:47 ET
Sen. John Kerry "has taken big lead," according "to an L.A. Times poll."
But the Times poll that showed Kerry "beating Bush by 7 points" has created a controversy over whether the poll's sample accurately reflects the population as whole, ROLL CALL reports on Tuesday.
"Not counting independents, the Times' results were calculated on a sample made up of 38 percent Democrats and 25 percent Republicans -- a huge and unheard-of margin," ROLL CALL claims.
15 posted on
06/15/2004 8:08:58 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
( Moore knew about the abuses in the Iraqi prisons, why didn't he say, "Stop it,, then!")
To: jmstein7
I think O'Reilly's just another wise a$$ charleton who knows how to make a lot of money on tv by playing both ends against the middle. He likes to come accross to the general public as a conservative, but he feels no shame in revealing his many liberal leanings. He's a phony.
18 posted on
06/15/2004 8:19:18 AM PDT by
TheCrusader
("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II)
To: jmstein7
If we could harness the hot air and pompousness of Bill we could replace petroleum as fuel.
I sent him an Email.
CG
20 posted on
06/15/2004 8:22:45 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(I will never give up. So don't ask me.)
To: jmstein7; All
22 posted on
06/15/2004 8:44:47 AM PDT by
68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
(Free Republic, where you get the REAL stories that the media refuses to carry!)
To: jmstein7
How 'bout if we e-mail O'reilly and and ask him to demand that TIME repay the taxpayers for the cost of a new bunker for the Vice President?
24 posted on
06/15/2004 8:55:05 AM PDT by
Eva
To: jmstein7
If O'Reilly is serious about pointing out the media bias, he needs to call the writers and the people behind the bias. He has refused to so thus far because he has friends involved and points that out on his show.
How can anyone take Bill O'Reilly serious on this matter if he collaborates with the enemy and protects them? As long as he does this, he is one of them.
To: jmstein7
The Slimes- I've been a proud non-subscriber since 1987.
31 posted on
06/15/2004 11:39:41 AM PDT by
Rockitz
(After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
To: jmstein7
Will do, not that I would rather be shot dead than read the NY Slimes...I like the derivative lawsuit idea!!!
Or the other good idea, besides a boycott, would be widespread publication of the media's bias, through websites and newsletters, as well as support from people like O'Reilly and Hannity. I am personally not interested in NY Slimes and others publishing the truth...I just want them to look like the slime that they are to the general reading public, and I want their readership to go down. We must explore options with this in mind!
38 posted on
06/15/2004 1:47:11 PM PDT by
Mich0127
(A village in Massachussets is missing their drunk...contact the Kennedys with any info immediately!)
To: jmstein7
great idea! My email has been sent.
To: jmstein7
40 posted on
06/15/2004 1:58:19 PM PDT by
Mich0127
(A village in Massachussets is missing their drunk...contact the Kennedys with any info immediately!)
To: jmstein7
IMO: that poser doesn't have the balls to call for an all-out boycott. And the only 'pithy' emails that make it to the screen are ones either that make him look good, or ones he can make a smug, snotty-@$$3D comment about.
43 posted on
06/15/2004 7:52:22 PM PDT by
solitas
("HA HA!" (Nelson Muntz))
To: jmstein7
Done! Want to take bets as to how 'ol Bill will react?
57 posted on
06/16/2004 4:45:20 PM PDT by
yoe
To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.
58 posted on
06/16/2004 10:40:36 PM PDT by
nutmeg
(God bless President Ronald Reagan)
To: jmstein7
Bill O'Reilly, "The Flatulence Factor".
60 posted on
06/17/2004 1:16:15 AM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
