NYT saw Al Qaeda Iraq connection in January 2001 . . . but now seems to forget

Prosecutors say the group also considered attacking Americans in Kenya to retaliate for the Somalia mission. Mr. Mohamed testified that Mr. bin Laden sent him to Nairobi in late 1993 to look over possible American, French, British and Israeli targets for a bomb attack, including the American Embassy. He said he took photos, drew diagrams and wrote a report, which he delivered to his boss in Khartoum. "Bin Laden looked at the picture of the American Embassy and pointed to where a truck could go as a suicide bomber," he said.

American prosecutors say Al Qaeda had more grandiose plans: a leading member, an Iraqi who Mr. Anas said had first gravitated to Mr. bin Laden in Afghanistan, tried to buy enriched uranium in Europe.

The Iraqi, Mahdouh Mahmud Salim, forged links between Mr. bin Laden's group and others supported by Iran. Mr. Salim met with an Iranian religious official in Khartoum, and soon afterward, the prosecutors say, Al Qaeda members got training from Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Shiite group in Lebanon skilled in making car bombs. American officials said this alliance was notable because it marked the first time radicals from the minority Shiite branch of Islam collaborated with extremists from the dominant Sunni branch.

But the Governor of Texas did not realize the problem because, clearly, the indictment was subject to the same standard of truth as the rest of the statements that the President delivered under oath. Had you read the indictment properly (and I choose not to do so), you would have realized that there is no connection between Saddam and bin Laden, as now has been revealed by Michael Moore (whom I consider to be colluding with the enemy and hence a traitor) as Truth, a view ratified as Truth by The New York Times, as it interprets an alleged conversation with a notoriously leftist and openly seditious staff member of the infamous Commission.

In any case, if the al-Qaida/Saddam ties were serious, then the Governor of Texas, to whom the Constitution of the United States of America, through emanations and penumbras, grants the sole power to wage preemptive warfare, would have sent the Texas Rangers, State Police, and National Guard on a covert intelligence-gathering mission to the Arab countries. But Governor George W. Bush was too morally weak and repugnant, having deserted the Texas Air National Guard, to order them to take proper action, which would have consisted of ousting the Taliban, capturing Usama bin Laden and delivering him to New York for trial, and effecting regime change in Iraq, a duty assigned to the Governor of Texas by the Congress of the United States by the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. He should have financed these wars, to whatever extent not approved by the legislature of the State of Texas, from his private fortune that he obtained by gouging Americans with artificially deflated gasoline prices through his business dealings with Halliburton and Enron.

Because of his failures to execute his duties as Governor of Texas, George W. Bush resigned in disgrace in December 2001 but was almost immediately anointed President by the Supreme Court in the only case of judicial tyranny on grand scale ever committed in the entire history of the United States despite the fact that Al Gore clearly had won the election, taking Florida by a landslide margin of negative five hundred votes. Once in the White House, the woefully incompetent Bush completely and totally failed to execute the duties of the Presidency, with a performance that ranks him worse than even James Buchanan.

On September 11, 2001, Bush recognized his failures as Governor of Texas to protect the American homeland by launching preemptive war. He was, however, no longer empowered by the Constitution to wage war as Commander in Chief, except with the explicit permission of a hodgepodge of cheese-eating surrender monkeys. His management of the economy left it the worst since Herbert Hoover--for those trying to run it into the ground. His foreign policy, likewise, proved to be a miserable failure for those seditiously supporting enemies of the hardworking American. He proved ignorant of Constitutional emanations and penumbras, wishing the Blessing of Almighty God upon our once-great nation and even opposing the most fundamental right of the liberal woman to murder a baby within herself.

But Bush imposed the most miserable failure upon the terrorists who wish to kill Americans, and for that the all-American patriots who practice sedition can be eternally angry.

I think I got that right, capturing the leftists' thoughts quite well. Hard to tell these days.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.