Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Arrested After Child Porn Found On Company Computer
WFTV Orlando Florida ^ | 06-30-2004 | WFTV.COM

Posted on 07/01/2004 10:59:04 AM PDT by Tank-FL

ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- An Orange County man was arrested Wednesday on charges of possessing child pornography. Thomas Allen Bispo confessed to looking at the porn on his work laptop.

Orange County detectives think Bispo was probably away on business when he was looking at child porn on a laptop. But he was using his company-issued computer and he thought he had deleted the porn.

Deputies arrested 61-year-old Thomas Allen Bispo after finding 27 pornographic images of young children on his laptop.

Detectives were actually tipped off. Bispo worked at Sypris, Inc., an engineering testing firm in Orange County. He gave his company-issued laptop to technicians for repairs after having trouble with pop-up ads on the screen.

"While they were trying to correct it, they discovered images on there that might be illegal," says Sgt Kevin Stenger, Computer Crimes Investigator.

Bispo's employer called the sheriff's office. Deputies later questioned Bispo and he confessed to viewing child porn.

"He stated that he would not keep it for any length of time, downloaded it, looked at it, and then deleted it," says Sgt. Stenger.

But the pictures still appeared on the hard drive. By law, you are only legally required to report child abuse when found, but detectives believe pornography involving kids is a form of child abuse. With no prior history of crimes like this, Bispo will bond out of jail but his bosses have already fired him.

If convicted, Thomas Bispo could be classified as a sexual offender, although he likely won't get any jail time. Still, his picture will appear on the FDLE website, it could affect his contact with children, and this could limit where he's allowed to live.

Detectives also want people to know that if they do find someone viewing or passing along child porn, the suspect in question cannot sue them. Those who report the crimes are legally protected under the law.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: adware; childporn; porn; spam
"the suspect in question cannot sue them."

Would your folks in IT do this?

I would - No Questions - No Worries ..

1 posted on 07/01/2004 10:59:05 AM PDT by Tank-FL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL

sure, but the problem is that with all this spam and pop ups and spyware - people can have images in their browser cache that they don't even know about, and did not willfully download. not this guy apparently, but it can happen.


2 posted on 07/01/2004 11:07:06 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL

One of the funniest stories on this happened in 2000.

A very vile hater of GW apparently was posting his hatred of GW to websites on company time.

Somehow, his place of posting was identified and copies of his vile hate posts of GW were forwarded to the CEO of the medium size company.

The companies IT manager investigated his computer and found that he was the author under several phoney names of hundreds of hate posts re GW. Then they found that he was running a child porn deal using the house computer during the daytime.

He is now in jail and will be for awhile.


3 posted on 07/01/2004 11:08:12 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Moore has not only insulted the nation, he has insulted the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

So you're saying its GW's fault, right ;)


4 posted on 07/01/2004 11:18:01 AM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ruiner

Apparently, that was part of the weak defense, this clymer tried to use.


5 posted on 07/01/2004 11:19:42 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Moore has not only insulted the nation, he has insulted the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

The Internet has a way of drawing out one's "true colors."


6 posted on 07/01/2004 11:22:39 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Manos - The Hands Of Fate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

"The Internet has a way of drawing out one's "true colors."

Yes, it does!


7 posted on 07/01/2004 11:26:16 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Moore has not only insulted the nation, he has insulted the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
The Internet has a way of drawing out one's "true colors."

What makes you say that?--you steaming pile of vile refuse!

8 posted on 07/01/2004 12:58:50 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Yep. I did a ContentWatch search and found cookies for all sorts of crazy places I've never been to like pussy.com and such.


9 posted on 07/01/2004 1:01:51 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

yeah. i remember a local news story/editorial a couple years ago about a woman divorcing her husband because she had discovered hundreds of "cookie hits" to a some site called sextracker (or something like that). she was convinced he was some freaky porn addict and left him, he claimed it was all a misconception and he wasn't into porn.

so i, being a techie, did some research, which i do a lot of, and found that the site that she based her claim on was something that would get hits from any web pages that advertise links to porn sites. i found quite a few hits on my own computer at the time even though i am not a purveyour of porn.

if you go to certain home pages, or off-color humor pages, certain blogs, or even some technology pages, etc. and there are advertisements to sites that you wouldn't approve of, and refrain from visiting, you'll still have cookies on your computer as if you had visited the site itself.

so be warned, you can get "associated" with sites that you never visit.

(i know it has nothing to do with deleted file but it is enough to make one put a tin-foil hat on once in a while, i.e. using a secure file eraser even though you have nothing to hide - but then having secure file erase could probably be used against you too!)


10 posted on 07/01/2004 1:48:33 PM PDT by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Hey, watch it! Or I'll start pinging you to low-carb posts again.


11 posted on 07/01/2004 5:06:23 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Manos - The Hands Of Fate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I don't remember your doing that. I wouldn't mind. I believe in low-carb!


12 posted on 07/02/2004 11:48:31 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: estrin59
I was forced to confess for possession of child porn. I got browser hijackers while browsing the web. I was redirected to illigal sites against my will. Some illigal pictures were found on my hard drive only after recovering in unallocated clusters, without dates of files

Sure, we believe you.

14 posted on 07/06/2004 10:37:15 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson