Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Moving Weapons Out of South Korea
The Las Vegas Sun ^ | July 16, 2004 at 22:17:42 PDT | HANS GREIMEL

Posted on 07/16/2004 11:41:05 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Today: July 16, 2004 at 22:17:42 PDT

U.S. Moving Weapons Out of South Korea

By HANS GREIMEL
ASSOCIATED PRESS

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - Around-the-clock train and truck convoys are moving military hardware from the tense border with North Korea as the U.S. Army prepares to redeploy 3,600 troops to Iraq.

The massive logistical feat began July 7 and is moving hundreds of Abrams tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles, Humvees and artillery pieces to the southern port city of Busan to be shipped out under tight security.

About 3,600 troops from the U.S. Army's 2nd Infantry Division, dug into encampments between Seoul and the heavily fortified border with North Korea, will follow their equipment to Iraq.

The division's entire 2nd Brigade would begin pulling out of South Korea next week, and the entire unit would be in Iraq by the end of August, Gen. Richard Cody, the Army's vice chief of staff, said at the Pentagon on Friday. It is expected to operate in western Iraq with Marine Corps units, Cody said.

The redeployment - one of the biggest realignments in a decade along the Cold War's last frontier - was announced in May and signals the first significant change of U.S. troop levels in South Korea since the early 1990s.

It underscores how the U.S. military is stretched to provide enough forces to cope with spiraling violence in Iraq while also meeting its other commitments.

The equipment is arriving around-the-clock at the Busan port, where soldiers are working two 12-hour shifts, U.S. Army spokeswoman Maj. Kathleen Johnson said.

"This is a very intensive operation, involving a large amount of equipment," Johnson said. "The scale of this operation is about five times that of what we ordinarily do."

The 2nd Infantry Division's 14,000 troops form the mainstay of the 37,000 U.S. troops in South Korea.

For decades, the U.S. troops have buttressed South Korea's 650,000-member military in guarding against the communist North's 1.1 million-member military, the world's fifth-largest.

Since announcing the redeployment of the 3,600 soldiers to Iraq, Washington also has said it plans to withdraw about a third of the remaining troops by the end of 2005 as part of a global realignment.

Talk of reducing the U.S. military presence is sometimes unsettling in South Korea, which still has painful memories of the North Korean invasion that triggered the 1950-53 Korean War.

Many South Koreans fear that a reduction in U.S. troops might shake the delicate military balance on the peninsula amid tensions over the North's nuclear weapons program. It also has prompted President Roh Moo-hyun to say his country is ready to play a bigger role in defending itself.

U.S. troops led U.N. forces during the Korean War, defending South Korea from North Korea, which was backed by China and the former Soviet Union. The U.S. troops have since stayed on.

--


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; iraq; korea; southkorea; troopmovement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2004 11:41:05 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; nuconvert; Cap Huff; Dog; jeffers; Coop; Boot Hill; blam; Grampa Dave; NormsRevenge

fyi


2 posted on 07/16/2004 11:42:33 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Dangerous work. Hopefully there are no accidents during deployment.


3 posted on 07/16/2004 11:45:26 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks for the heads up.

I personally think "It's about time."

4 posted on 07/16/2004 11:46:50 PM PDT by Positive (There's nothing sadder than seeing a group of great ideas being murdered by a bunch of brutal facts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Shouldn't we be moving troops out of europe before we take them out of South Korea?

I am sure our naval forces in Japan could bloody the nose of North Korea though. And hasn't the South Koreans been asking us to move troops away from the border for the last few years?

5 posted on 07/16/2004 11:47:51 PM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I think a lot of things need to be changed with regard to where we have troops deployed and etc....

They need to get some of the specialties out of the Guards into the regular Army also, so that we don't hear about Guard units getting repetitive deployments.
6 posted on 07/17/2004 12:01:15 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Does the Bush administration know something we don't? Could this be a way of avoiding massive casualties to our troops? Between North Korea and Iran, I sense big things coming sooner rather than later.


7 posted on 07/17/2004 12:03:23 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (To find the Dumbocratic Party, just follow the sound of the cuckoo clock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It underscores how the U.S. military is stretched to provide enough forces to cope with spiraling violence in Iraq while also meeting its other commitments.

I don't believe this is the reason.

8 posted on 07/17/2004 12:04:34 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Well, the acting head of the CIA did warn about something BIG and bad coming....


9 posted on 07/17/2004 12:05:27 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
They need to get some of the specialties out of the Guards into the regular Army

Thats true. I suppose thats because in times of peace they don't need as much of certain things. And those things get shipped off to the reserves.

10 posted on 07/17/2004 12:07:24 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Does the Bush administration know something we don't?

Naw, his sources are the same as yours and mine. : )

11 posted on 07/17/2004 12:07:34 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
I don't believe this is the reason

I agree.

X gets the square and the win!!

12 posted on 07/17/2004 12:08:50 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
And hasn't the South Koreans been asking us to move troops away from the border for the last few years?

Yes it has been an ongoing discussion between the two of us for quite some time.

13 posted on 07/17/2004 12:10:48 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
The current setup with what is in NG and what is in Regular Army goes back to a Congressional Decision in 1970 as I heard it described on one of the TV news programs.
14 posted on 07/17/2004 12:10:48 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; EGPWS

I agree too. AP has to get their digs in to support the current "Urban Legend" amongst the News Types....


15 posted on 07/17/2004 12:13:27 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
X gets the square and the win!!

X and wins?

What do I win???

I'm still working on figgerin' your reply last night referencing Barney Frank, and ya' threw me another one! : 0 LoL's!

16 posted on 07/17/2004 12:15:23 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper; Molly Pitcher; Miss Marple; Neets; Dog

ping


17 posted on 07/17/2004 12:18:22 AM PDT by kayak (Help stamp out FReepathons. Become a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; EGPWS
EGPWS You win this link =o) :

Its sort of about Joe Wilson, skip the story and go to the posts, its funny.

EATB- I noticed how partisan the media is this year, much worse than normal. They aren't even attempting to hide it and many articles have no balance and they never challenge even the most outrageous claims. Take this, its my post, as an example

18 posted on 07/17/2004 12:22:59 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Boot Hill; blam; Cap Huff; Coop; Dog; EGPWS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; endthematrix; GeronL; ..
Around-the-clock train and truck convoys are moving military hardware from the tense border with North Korea as the U.S. Army prepares to redeploy 3,600 troops to Iraq. The massive logistical feat began July 7 and is moving hundreds of Abrams tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles, Humvees and artillery pieces to the southern port city of Busan to be shipped out under tight security. About 3,600 troops from the U.S. Army's 2nd Infantry Division... would be in Iraq by the end of August, Gen. Richard Cody, the Army's vice chief of staff, said at the Pentagon on Friday. It is expected to operate in western Iraq with Marine Corps units, Cody said... The 2nd Infantry Division's 14,000 troops form the mainstay of the 37,000 U.S. troops in South Korea. For decades, the U.S. troops have buttressed South Korea's 650,000-member military in guarding against the communist North's 1.1 million-member military, the world's fifth-largest... Talk of reducing the U.S. military presence is sometimes unsettling in South Korea... Many South Koreans fear that a reduction in U.S. troops might shake the delicate military balance on the peninsula amid tensions over the North's nuclear weapons program. It also has prompted President Roh Moo-hyun to say his country is ready to play a bigger role in defending itself.
The ****-heads who currently run Korea (a.k.a. South Korea -- the Pyongyang regime is an illegal secessionist dictatorship that has deteriorated into an hereditary monarchy) have been verbally anti-American. This move by the US (plus the beheading of the Korean by the Arab/Moslem terrorists in Iraq) will probably result in an alteration of attitude and/or electoral loss in favor of pro-US politicians.

I'd also suggest that this withdrawal is the supreme dissin' of Pyongyang, as it indicates that the US no longer sees its starving military as a threat (even though the US contingent's small size is also insulting). Starve the bastards out. They can try to eat those one million howitzers.
George W. Bush will be reelected by a margin of at least ten per cent
NOT A PING LIST, merely posted to: AdmSmith; Boot Hill; blam; Cap Huff; Coop; Dog; EGPWS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; endthematrix; GeronL; Grampa Dave; jeffers; NormsRevenge; nuconvert; Positive; WestVirginiaRebel

19 posted on 07/17/2004 12:26:56 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
EGPWS You win this link =o) :

I'll retire then, as soon as I get Paul Lynde of my mind!!

20 posted on 07/17/2004 12:28:15 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson