1 posted on
08/05/2004 3:39:09 PM PDT by
scripter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: ItsOurTimeNow; little jeremiah; EdReform
2 posted on
08/05/2004 3:39:56 PM PDT by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: scripter
3 posted on
08/05/2004 3:40:14 PM PDT by
The Mayor
("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
To: scripter
What about hermaphrodites?
4 posted on
08/05/2004 3:43:14 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: scripter
To: scripter
"What to Do About Transsexuals ?" Heal ?
To: scripter
Does the sexual mutilation crowd claim they're like that because of genetics too ?
7 posted on
08/05/2004 3:46:41 PM PDT by
Guillermo
(John f'n Kerry is an f'n punk)
To: scripter
You mean there's not enough room in the "rainbow tent"? What about DI-VER-SI-TY?
Tsk Tsk! Sounds like discrimination to me!
8 posted on
08/05/2004 3:47:29 PM PDT by
sneakers
To: scripter
Gee, where to start?
"In a climate where the GOP is using scare tactics to erase the GLBT people from gaining civil rights,
The opposition to gay marriage is BI-PARTISAN. There is no GOP conspiracy against gays or transgendered people.
"The first lesson," said Foreman, "is not to accept what legislators have to say on this subject."
Legislators speak for the people who voted for them. That's their job. So what you're really saying is don't listen to people who vote.
Why don't we just do away with voting altogether and allow any dictator who can muster the power to take over ..... to tell us all what to do and what to believe? Problem solved.
9 posted on
08/05/2004 3:48:32 PM PDT by
Lorianne
To: scripter
Well here goes the slope we have all been waiting on. The downward spiral to transgender, sibling lovers, polygomy, and animal relationships.
This is exactly why we have to have an amendment. Although I don't think we should have to do anything.
It should be the opposing view that has to convince us, the man and woman group, that they have to pass an amendment. Why should we have to protect what already is?
It all boils down to tolerance and acceptance. The gays can't tolerate us because we believe marriage is between man and woman. So much for their tolerance. I thought it went both ways.
And acceptance. I am convinced that this recognition is more important than their lover getting benefits.
11 posted on
08/05/2004 3:53:59 PM PDT by
Zyke
To: scripter
The homos don't get it! THEY are NOT normal and now they want to discriminate against another abnormal group - transsexuals. Talk about ignoring the opposite - homos and then being hypocritical of another abnormal group!
12 posted on
08/05/2004 3:58:41 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: scripter
A poofter who lived in Khartoum
Took a lesbian up to his room.
They spent half the night
Arguing who had the right
To do what and with which and to whom!
13 posted on
08/05/2004 3:58:44 PM PDT by
quark
To: scripter
;Homosexuals Debate What to Do About Transsexuals
Aw screw em............
;-)
15 posted on
08/05/2004 4:15:52 PM PDT by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: scripter
Transgender Menace ?????????????
16 posted on
08/05/2004 4:17:25 PM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: scripter
20 posted on
08/05/2004 9:49:18 PM PDT by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: scripter
Defeating Gay Arguments
Changing Minds
Here's another:
21 posted on
08/05/2004 9:50:55 PM PDT by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: scripter; EdReform; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...
- Homosexual Agenda PING -
Well, I can't add much more to the commentary than what's already been said.
I just find it hysterical that a fringe group has a small fringe group protesting it for not being more inclusive. Something about the visualization of their "protest" just makes me chuckle.
(If you want on or off this ping list, please FReepmail me.)
*Use post twice daily, or as recommended by doctor or freeper.*
To: scripter
While the homosexual community wrestles with transsexual inclusion, many conservatives reject the entire GLBT agenda to redefine cultural norms.
The re-definition of marriage is unacceptable to many conservative groups, and so it the notion that one's gender may also be subject to re-definition -- that gender is psychological, not biological.
The advent of transgender protection also gives rise to new dilemmas and lawsuits, a particular concern to the business community.
Thank goodness the Republicans are standing up to THIS mess, they're not really holding the fort with illegals.
24 posted on
08/06/2004 2:41:24 PM PDT by
I_Love_My_Husband
(Borders, Language, Culture, Straights - now more than ever)
To: scripter
I figure they'd just buy them drinks and ask if they want to see their art collection!
28 posted on
08/06/2004 11:12:46 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(I voted FOR John Kerry...before I voted against him!)
To: scripter
Matt Foreman, the executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, wrote an op-ed on Tuesday, saying the time for debate is over: Foreman says it's time to include transsexuals in all pro-homosexual federal legislation, including the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). Shouldn't that be the B-GLT Employment Non-Discrimination Equity Resolution (BENDER)?
Ever notice how often these guys get up and announce that "the time for debate is over"?
To: scripter
Well, I was going to suggest that public restrooms be expanded. Hetro Men, Hetro Women, Gay Men, Lesbians. However, after reading this article, it appears a fifth restroom is also needed for transexuals.
36 posted on
08/07/2004 6:23:35 PM PDT by
BJungNan
(Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson