Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pittsburgh Using Fines to Boost Recycling
AP @ Yahoo ^ | 08/07/04 | DAN NEPHIN, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 08/07/2004 10:33:55 AM PDT by Josh in PA

Pittsburgh Using Fines to Boost Recycling

Sat Aug 7, 8:48 AM ET

By DAN NEPHIN, Associated Press Writer

PITTSBURGH - When Pittsburgh began fining residents earlier this year for not complying with the city's mandatory recycling law, it was venturing into relatively uncharted territory. Few Pennsylvania communities with mandatory recycling laws fine residents.

If city workers don't see bundles of newspapers or the blue bags used for glass, cans and plastic placed outside a home on recycling day, the city will contact the resident about the requirement, said Guy Costa, the public works director.

"If we send you a letter and then you continue not to recycle, then we send you a citation," Costa said, who called the fines a last resort.

The city has issued about 100 citations since stepping up enforcement in the spring. Fines with court costs are $62.50. A second offense costs more than $500, though Costa said none have been issued.

Costa said failing to recycle costs the city money. It's paid $11 a ton for glass, cans and plastics and $30 a ton for newspaper, Costa said. Statewide, the average cost to take municipal trash to a landfill is about $57 per ton, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Pittsburgh, like other communities that recycle, also can qualify for performance grants, which help pay for manpower and equipment.

"There's a lot of incentives in there for the city and the residents to recycle as much as they can," Costa said. About 40 percent of city households recycle, he said.

While some people have complained about the fines, Costa said he's been getting mostly positive comments.

"The feedback I've been getting is, 'It's about time because I've been recycling and my neighbor hasn't been,'" Costa said.

Recycling became mandatory in 1988 in larger communities in Pennsylvania and has since expanded to many smaller communities. In 2002, the most recent year for which figures are available, the state recycling rate was about 38 percent, said DEP spokesman Tom Rathbun.

Neither the DEP nor the federal Environmental Protection Agency (news - web sites) track communities that fine residents for not recycling.

"We just want (recycling communities) to have a successful program," Rathbun said.

A sampling of communities showed fines are not used often. Recycling officials said they stress education instead.

Reading has issued very few fines said Ann Saurman, education and enforcement coordinator for the city's bureau of recycling and solid waste. Workers notify nonrecyclers by certified letter. The city will supply bins if needed and follow up to make sure the message has gotten across.

"Most of the time, those steps are effective," Saurman said.

Over the last half-dozen years, Saurman said, the city has had an average recycling compliance rate of 95 percent.

In Erie, where about 55 percent of households recycle, the carrot is being used to boost participation, said Sarah Galloway, the city's recycling and environmental resource program coordinator.

Last month, its recycling department began monitoring households to see if residents put out cans, bottles and newspapers. Households that do can win a $50 gift certificate to a grocery store.

"Instead of punishing people, we're rewarding them," Galloway said.

However, Gene Hejmanowski, the environmental director of Penn Township in York County, isn't above using the stick.

The township has a pay-as-you throw program where residents buy trash bags, which Hejmanowski said is more equitable than every resident paying a flat rate.

Hejmanowski and his crew fan out and check trash bags once residents place them out for pickup.

"If I find a recyclable item in your bag, I leave you with a warning subject to a $600 (maximum) fine," he said. Likewise, if he finds trash in recycling.

"I run a very tight program. I'm an ex-Marine and I run this like it was Parris Island," Hejmanowski said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: pittsburgh; recycling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
RECYCLE OR PAY THE PRICE BUDDY! Government FORCING citizens to do something they don't want to.
1 posted on 08/07/2004 10:33:56 AM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

And if you don't subscribe to a newspaper or buy things in recyclable containers, you'd better start.


2 posted on 08/07/2004 10:38:59 AM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
Costa said failing to recycle costs the city money. It's paid $11 a ton for glass, cans and plastics and $30 a ton for newspaper, Costa said. Statewide, the average cost to take municipal trash to a landfill is about $57 per ton, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Conveniently leaving out the costs of collecting and processing the recyclables, which is on the order of $60 a ton. An astute reporter would have either asked about that or found it through research.

3 posted on 08/07/2004 10:43:53 AM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

""I run a very tight program. I'm an ex-Marine and I run this like it was Parris Island," Hejmanowski said."

Here's one little wannabe Hitler that we should get rid of REAL quick....


4 posted on 08/07/2004 10:46:29 AM PDT by RS (Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Remind me never to move to Pennsylvania.


5 posted on 08/07/2004 10:46:33 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
And if you don't subscribe to a newspaper or buy things in recyclable containers, you'd better start.

Probably the best solution is to gather up with two or three neighbors and split the recyclables, so everybody has a few.

Well, that's not the best solution. The best solution would be to vote out the recycling Nazis.

6 posted on 08/07/2004 10:46:40 AM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
If I bought it, it belongs to me.

You want it? You pay me for it.

Case closed.

7 posted on 08/07/2004 10:47:43 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Government forces people to do things all the time. It's one reason we have such a bloated, corrupt system, and so many Democrats.


8 posted on 08/07/2004 10:49:42 AM PDT by The Libertarian Dude (Why, if we can just pass a few more laws, we can ALL be criminals! - J.R. "Bob" Dobbs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Mandatory recycling is slavery (and government make-work).

You know when recycling makes economic sense when private entities are willing to pay you enough for your recyclables to make it worth your trouble.


9 posted on 08/07/2004 10:51:46 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Josh in PA
Trust me, it's not that bad once you get used to it. I lived in Germany for three years (Army) and was forced to recycle. Now it feels wierd when I have to use a regular garbage can at a place where there isn't a special place to put recyclables.

It's easy and it actually does help. It saves money too.
12 posted on 08/07/2004 10:55:52 AM PDT by rivercat (Welcome to California. Now go home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Wow! I thought I was the only one who believed that forced recycling was a scam forcing me to do the work of the sanitation department.


13 posted on 08/07/2004 10:59:50 AM PDT by raybbr (My 1.4 cents - It used to be 2 cents, but after taxes - you get the idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Mandatory recycling is slavery (and government make-work).
It really is manmade work. My city has a recycling program and the trash and recylclables are hauled to another town 55 miles away. 2 years ago a story broke that all the recycle items were being dumped into the landfill there along with the regular garbage because they didn't want to spend the money on their end to hire the personnel to process the recyclables. Even after this story broke, we continue to recycle here in this town. Makes no sense.
14 posted on 08/07/2004 11:02:43 AM PDT by Muzzle_em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Move to the country and burn your trash. Do your part to contribute to global warming as I do.


15 posted on 08/07/2004 11:05:24 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Another "Pittsburgh is Hell" Ping!


16 posted on 08/07/2004 11:05:58 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (Rick Nash will score 50 goals this season ( if there is a season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

First it was sold as everybody doing their part to "save the environment." Now the volunteer days are over. Isn't that the way all do-gooder government programs work? Comply because you're a good person. Oh, you don't want to be a good person? Then we will make you comply!


17 posted on 08/07/2004 11:09:29 AM PDT by holyscroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcam

that's not the point dcam.

The point is government is handing down chores to people, if they don't do them, they are persecuted.

This is the United States of America.



18 posted on 08/07/2004 11:09:41 AM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
How comical! In most municipalities with curbside recycling they keep the aluminum cans, but other than that it just all goes in the landfill. It's just not economically practical other than the grant or matching monies to run the operation. The result is what we have now.

I asked my garbage pickup driver and also followed several of their "recyclables" trucks. I followed them right to the county landfill. They had county prison inmates taking the aluminum and all the rest went right into the landfill. It gives the soccer moms something to do though.

19 posted on 08/07/2004 11:11:23 AM PDT by blackdog (Hell is an endless hayfield needing to be raked, baled, and put up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcam
It saves money too.

Proof and sources?

20 posted on 08/07/2004 11:11:48 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson