Posted on 08/27/2004 5:47:48 PM PDT by Good.V.Evil
GOP Finds Duplicate Voting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible Duplicate Registration and Voting, 1998 and General Elections
Overall Findings
An analysis of all or part of 11 states (AZ, CT, FL, MA, NC, NJ, NM, NY, PA, RI, SC) resulted in the following findings:
Based on 2000 records, in those states there are 140,109 people who are registered to vote in two locations (could be two states or two counties in the same state). This includes the NY Post study. Without the NY Post numbers, the total new double registrations found is 69,887.
Based on 1998 records, 219 people's voter registrations were voted twice (once each in different locations) in the 1998 election.
Based on 2000 records, 689 people's voter registrations were voted twice (once each in different locations) in the 2000 election.
Section 1, Duplicate Registration and Voting Between States New York Post, 12/19/00, Reference
(Registration) NYC/LI to Florida *Registrants '00
Bronx 1,610
Brooklyn 3,294
Manhattan 2,882
Nassau 1,454
Staten Island 3,298
Suffolk 558
Total 14,496
Source: NY Post, Double-Dippers Sign Up to Vote in N.Y. and Florida, 12/19/00
Subsequent RNC Findings
(Voting) NYC to Florida Voters '00
Broward 99
Miami-Dade 122
Palm Beach 65
Total 286
CT (20,207 intrastate dupes) Reg '00 Voters '00 Voters '98
Arizona 114 n/a n/a
Massachusetts 1,460 n/a n/a
New Mexico 37 n/a n/a
North Carolina 300 n/a n/a
South Carolina 117 n/a n/a
Rhode Island 207 n/a n/a
Total 2,235 n/a n/a
NJ (18,246 intrastate duplicates) Reg '00 Voters '00 Voters '98
Arizona 596 15 n/a
Florida 7,475 207 65
New Mexico 125 n/a n/a
(1) New York 2,101 33 16
North Carolina 2,052 52 n/a
(2) Pennsylvania 6,786 39 40
South Carolina 1,042 52 n/a
Total 20,177 398 121
(1) NJ counties include Bergen, Hudson and Union, NY boroughs include Manhattan, Bronx and Staten Island
(2) NJ counties include Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, Mercer and Sussex, PA counties include Philadelphia, Bucks and Delaware
PA (17,276 intrastate duplicates) Reg '00 Voters '00 Voters '98
Arizona 592 n/a n/a
Florida 18,049 n/a n/a
New Mexico 658 n/a n/a
North Carolina 9,193 n/a n/a
South Carolina 3,980 n/a n/a
Total 32,472 n/a n/a
Section 2, Duplicate Registration and Voting Across City/County Boundaries (Intrastate)
City/County of Philadelphia, PA Reg '00 Voters '00 Voters '98
Chester 1,422 5 29
Delaware 2,978 9 17
Montgomery 7,339 22 39
Bucks 3,208 17 13
Total 14,947 53 98
City of Pittsburgh, PA Reg '00 Voters '00 Voters '98
Allegheny 56 0 n/a
Privacy & Security Policy | Paid for by the Republican State Committee of Pennsylvania | Copyright©2002, Republican State Committee of Pennsylvania
Republican State Committee of Pennsylvania 112 State Street | Harrisburg, PA 17101 | Phone (717) 234-4901 | FAX (717) 231-3828 | info@pagop.org
I agree 100%. It's the fraud factor that makes Republicans have to win big in order to win at all in many local areas and states and this is definitely the case in the presidential elections now.
I heard a rumor or fact that in 2000 Philly and Detroit both had 100% voter turnout. I wonder if any freepers have any info??
Is why, we got to pray and work and work some more. We need Pres. Bush to have a wide enough margin to keep the dims from cheating the system.
And if my aunt had...
Why don't they give party affiliation?
Hmm... A national standard for voting registration databases, which will allow a cross check between state databases after voter registration closes.
States stay in control, database records with problems such as double registration are investigated and reconciled. The press can monitor the process, it can be completely open.
That implies they are trying. In reality, they are doing everything they possibly can to cause as much fraud as possible in the hopes that Bush will not win. They are institutionalizing voter fraud.
I thik the results are a lot clearer if you click on the pennsylvania GOP link under the thread title.
Exactly! Who would vote Democrat so they could pay everyone else's bills? I thought that was odd.
50% of the nation is "suppose" to be Democrat, but a whole 50% doesn't leech off other people.
Only those who are homosexuals, whores, or social parasites would be Democrats.
we need to have poll watchers everywhere ....EVERYWHERE!!
That's why Hewitt wrote "If it's not close, they can't cheat".
H8
I wondered that too, maybe it is on the website. I know that in New York the number is 68%/12% Dem/Rep. If that helps.
It's a GOP site. If it were Republicans, do you think they'd report it?
This is exactly what I have been telling my husband. The Dems have been getting away with voter fraud for years, and are increasingly more blatant about it, all the while projecting accusations of such against the Republicans. And why not? When are they held to account? I told my husband back in 2000 that if Pres. Bush and the Republicans did not come out strong to expose and fight Dem voter fraud, it would come back to haunt them again.
The Dems have been very diligent worker bees these past four years, getting every detail into place, probably more than we can even imagine. Getting ready for the Coup D'Etat. If they don't succeed this time, it will only be because Hillary wants her turn in '08 (Barf). If Pres. Bush wins this time, can you just imagine the incensed crazed foaming at the mouth Commies, come 2008?
If you folks believe as I do that this IS the most important election of our lives then sign up to work the election as an election clerk or election judge or sign up as an observer and report abonormalities. Maybe someone will listen this time around.
Are your figures for dual registrations or for dual voting. I'm not sure dual registration is always evidence of wrong doing.
If something could have been done about voter fraud, the 2000 election would not have been in any sort of dispute....
That's a great idea.
Why isn't it being investigated more? It should be a huge issue in Washington!
The Democrats like to claim they won PA in 2000. A lot of us don't beleive it. Here's something from a John Fund column, it's representative:
"Philadelphia has a long reputation of fixing elections as a means of controlling patronage and municipal contracts. The Philadelphia Inquirer has noted that the city has just over one million registered voters. Since that's just about the number of eligible voters the U.S. census estimates live in the city, experts believe there are upward of 80,000 fraudulent registrations.
The source of this info is a Philadelphia Inquirer article. The Inquirer is one of the most left-wing papers in the country--consistently to the left of the NYT. If they admit to a problem, imagine how bad it really is.
Yes. Duplicate registration is just the tip of the iceberg in PA.
And if the media reported the Truth, rather than acting as a Dem propaganda machine, we'd be looking at a historic 50 state landslide with the Dems locked out of a credible run for the next generation.
It'll be intersting, to say the least, to learn how effective modern brainwashing has been on the population.
Ping/vote fraud
Yes, massive Democrat Voter Fraud is something we have to fight every year. I'm getting sick of it. I want to see some SOBs thrown in jail over this. Seriously.
Are your figures for dual registrations or for dual voting. I'm not sure dual registration is always evidence of wrong doing.
It is for both.
If you click on the web addy below the thread title, it is a lot easier to understand.
I have a question for the thread.
A hypothetical question.
If you were a strong bush supporter, and you owned a vacation home in a different state, and you could register to vote in your "second home state" without abandoning your original home state's registration....................
Would you vote twice for bush?
Just wondering...............................
At the time, I wrote that if this is true, then the GOP deserves to lose if they didn't put on a major effort over the next four years to combat voter fraud. If they've done anything, I haven't seen it.
The story is told that a top Dem operative bragged to a top GOP operative in 1960 that they would always be able to steal a close election. He was talking about a few hundred or thousand votes here and there -- a Florida-type situation, or one like South Dakota's last Senate race. I have no doubt that had a recount actually proceeded in Florida in 2000, Al Gore would have won that recount. Democrats do cheat.
What is being alleged here on FR, though, is something on a much more massive scale. If it is true, then we must pray that this isn't a close election (I don't think it will be), because I've heard of nothing having been done to combat voter fraud. You know how I know it hasn't been done? I haven't heard the Dems screaming...
Philly had 900,000 votes cast out of a total population of 1,300,000 (according to 2000 census). That's a helluva turnout
Over 30 states allow felons to regain voting rights after completion of sentence.
States stay in control, database records with problems such as double registration are investigated and reconciled. The press can monitor the process, it can be completely open.
There is a way to do it now, but most conservatives would not be inclined to support it.
Would you vote twice for bush?
No.
"Would you vote twice for bush"
With the amount of outright fraud that was committed in 2000, and what is likely to be this year by the socialist party. YES (if I knew I could get by with it)
If you were a strong bush supporter, and you owned a vacation home in a different state, and you could register to vote in your "second home state" without abandoning your original home state's registration....................
Problem is, the state I live in is solidly Bush. The same goes for most states I'd have a vacation home in
There's a current article here on FR the last couple of days where college students in Arizona plan on registering to vote in AZ. They can vote absentee in their home state from a month to 3 months before the election, then register in their college state a mere 3-4 weeks before Election Day and go vote at the polls. (OF course these students say they're for Kerry...Kerry must win at all costs.)
The notion of it being unlawful to have to prove you are who you say you are when you show up to vote is ludicrous...this is one of the most important things a citizen can do, and it's "illegal" to try to prevent fraud. Why NOT require a photo ID, link databases with SSN or DL identification nationwide, and have very harsh penalties for voter fraud? Because it might offend an illegal immigrant who registered through motor voter? Because it might make it more difficult for RATS to perpetuate rigged election results? Bah! It's infuriating to see the groundwork being laid for yet another orchestrated stuffing of the ballot box and not even a stern look being offered to the breathless braggarts. (My .02)
"(if I knew I could get by with it)"
Stepping from the hypothetical into the real world, let's consider that, in most states, the actual list of registered voters is only slightly different than a telemarketing company's phone list.
Thanks for an honest answer.
"Problem is, the state I live in is solidly Bush. The same goes for most states I'd have a vacation home in"
So, if the state in question were not up for grabs, the answer would be "NO".
Sounds reasonable.
And not a damn case prosecuted, I bet.
This is why it is so critically important to control state legislatures and especially the Justcic Department, including the FBI. And this is also a big reason why the rats are so scared to death that Bush will win reelection.
The reasoning is easy:
GOP Justice Department = vote fraud gets investigated and prosecuted.
Rat Justice Department = vote fraud gets enabled, covered up, and rampant.
And if my aunt had...
And if a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass every time he jumped.
Wonder how much these double (and triple?) registrations connect to the "low voter turnout"?????
If you had 800 outstanding warrants you would not want to show an ID either....:)
The Wisconsin legislature passed a voter ID bill, and Governor Doyle (D) vetoed it. Gee, I wonder why!
How many of the leftist students at the Madison U of W are registered and are voting double for the Dems.? How many students are on that campus now? 60,000+++? This is the same state that was offering cigarettes to homeless voters in Milwaukee in the last election. Only SOME got caught.
There is another big area of possible double registrations and voters, The homeless.
This makes me physically ill. Dear G-d, something has to be done about this.
Actually, I read an article on FR recently about attempts to investigate voter fraud in FL. Of course, the article (a column or perhaps editorial from NY Times) was very much against it, and called it "voter suppression" aimed at keeping blacks from voting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.