Posted on 08/31/2004 12:09:16 PM PDT by NonValueAdded
Rush's Interview with President George W. Bush
August 31, 2004
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH LIMBAUGH: Ladies and gentlemen, we have been saying President Bush will join us at 1:45 this afternoon, about 12 minutes from now, but he can't wait. He's so excited, he's here now. President George W. Bush, welcome to the program, sir. Nice to have you with us.
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Thank you, Rush. It's an honor to talk to you.
RUSH: Where are you right now?
THE PRESIDENT: I am in Des Moines, Iowa.
RUSH: And you are going...?
THE PRESIDENT: I just came from Nashville, Tennessee. I'm on my way to a big rally with some of our farmers and then I'm going to go to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, where I will be participating in the convention from afar. After all, the First Lady Bush will be addressing the nation, and I want to welcome her to the podium.
RUSH: Let's talk about the American Legion convention. I watched your speech there this morning, and the Democrats are harping on something you said yesterday, or that was aired yesterday on the Today Show with Matt Lauer about your comment about we can't win it, meaning the war on terror. I think I know what you meant but John Edwards is out there saying (paraphrased), "A-ha! Bush is now flip-flopping, and we, John Kerry and I, we can win this, and Bush is..." What did you mean by this?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I appreciate you bringing that up. Listen, I should have made my point more clear about what I meant. What I meant was that this is not a conventional war. It is a different kind of war. We're fighting people who have got a dark ideology who use terrorists, terrorism, as a tool. They're trying to shake our conscience. They're trying to shake our will, and so in the short run the strategy has got to be to find them where they lurk. I tell people all the time, "We will find them on the offense. We will bring them to justice on foreign lands so we don't have to face them here at home," and that's because you cannot negotiate with these people. And in a conventional war there would be a peace treaty or there would be a moment where somebody would sit on the side and say we quit. That's not the kind of war we're in, and that's what I was saying. The kind of war we're in requires, you know, steadfast resolve, and I will continue to be resolved to bring them to justice, but as well as to spread liberty. And this is one of the interesting points of the debate, Rush, is that, you know, I believe societies can be transformed because of liberty, and I believe that Iraq and Afghanistan will be free nations, and I believe that those free nations right there in the heart of the Middle East will begin to transform that region into a more hopeful place, which in itself will be a detriment to the ability to these terrorists to recruit -- and that's what I was saying. I probably needed to be a little more articulate.
RUSH: Well, it's like saying that they're all over the world. You're not fighting a country here, a series of countries. You're fighting a movement that will hide out anywhere it can, and you're always going to have a renegade terrorist. Even if, let's say, we wipe out Al-Qaeda. There's some other group or individual that may spring up and blow up a bomb somewhere. That's always going to happen because it always has.
THE PRESIDENT: Right. Really what I was saying to Lauer was, is that this is not the kind of war where you sit down and sign a peace treaty. It's a totally different kind of war. But we will win it. Your listeners have got to know that I know we'll win it, but we're going to have to be resolved and firm, and we can't doubt what we stand for, and the long-term solution is to spread freedom. I love to tell the story, Rush, about a meeting with Prime Minister Koizumi. He's my friend. He's the prime minister of Japan. It wasn't all that long ago that my dad, your dad, and others dads were fighting against the Japanese, but because after World War II we believed that Japan could self-govern and could be democratic in its own fashion, Japan is no longer an enemy; it's a friend, and so I sit down with him to help resolve issues like the North Korean peninsula. In other words, we're working together to keep the peace. The same thing is going to happen in Iraq and Afghanistan, and that's when I say the transformational power of liberty. That's what I'm talking about.
RUSH: Well, I remember you also said in one of your first speeches after the 9/11 attacks that this is going to go maybe beyond one or even two terms that you might serve.
THE PRESIDENT: I think so. On the other hand, we're making great progress. Today at the Legion I said, "We're winning the war on terror, and we will win the war on terror." There's no doubt in my mind, so long as this country stays resolved and strong and determined, and by winning, I just would remind your listeners that Pakistan is now an ally in the war on terror. Saudi now takes Al-Qaeda seriously, and they're after the leadership. Libya is no longer got weapons of mass destruction. Afghanistan, I don't know if you've discussed this on your program, but there are over ten million people who have registered to vote in Afghanistan, which is a phenomenal statistic when you think about it. And then of course Iraq is now heading toward elections as well, and we're making progress.
RUSH: Let me ask you --
THE PRESIDENT: Go ahead.
RUSH: Let me ask you about Iraq, because as I look at your opponent and his party, it seems to me that they want to separate the war on terror as something that's localized in Afghanistan, and that Iraq is a rogue war that you started for whatever reasons they've concocted, and they are trying to make the American people believe there's no linkage whatsoever --
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah.
RUSH: -- between Iraq and the war on terror. Now, I've heard you not only today, but in previous addresses that you've made, there clearly is a linkage in your mind. Could you explain to the American people who are listening to this program, what is that linkage, war on terror to Iraq, why we're there? What your vision is for the war in Iraq? In your second term, what do you hope –
THE PRESIDENT: Sure.
RUSH: -- happens and when?
THE PRESIDENT: First, let me address my opponents. They all, they saw a threat in Iraq, and they voted to remove Saddam Hussein by force if necessary. So, in other words, you know, John Kerry looked at the same intelligence I saw and saw a threat and voted for the authorization of force.
RUSH: Before he voted against it?
THE PRESIDENT: Pardon me?
RUSH: Before he voted against it?
THE PRESIDENT: (Laughing.) Well, that was -- you're talking about the actually funding of troops.
RUSH: Right.
THE PRESIDENT: He made, in my judgment, a big mistake by saying yes, we can use force but we're not going to provide the troops the equipment necessary to fight the war.
RUSH: That's what it was.
THE PRESIDENT: Now, Iraq. You see, one of the lessons of September the 11th is that we gotta deal with threats before they fully materialize, and we saw a threat in Iraq. I say "we." The Congress saw a threat, I saw a threat and the United Nations Security Council saw a threat. In other words, the world took a look and said, "Saddam is a threat," and here's why they thought he was a threat. One, he used weapons of mass destruction, and one of the most dangerous parts of this new war is that if the enemy were ever to acquire the capacity to use a weapon of mass destruction it would make September 11th, you know, pale in comparison, and so we saw that threat.
Secondly, he had ties to terrorists. Abu Nidal was housed in Iraq, his organization. He was the guy that killed Leon Klinghoffer. He was a known terrorist. Zarqawi -- who's now, you know, the person beheading people in Iraq today -- was in and out of Baghdad and Iraq, as were members of his organization. So he had terrorist ties. As a matter of fact, not only did he have terrorist ties, he used to subsidize families of these suicide bombers, which is a terrorist act.
Thirdly, he invaded his neighbors. Fourthly, he was an enemy of this country, and we had been to war with him once. He had invaded others in the neighborhood. He was a source of great instability. So I saw a threat, and given the lessons of September the 11th, we decided to remove him from power, having tried diplomacy. See, I think it's very important for your listeners to know, Rush, that the commander-in-chief ought to try all avenues of diplomacy prior to committing troops and we did that. And so I'm sitting in the Oval Office, and I've seen a threat. I now see that he's ignoring the demands of the free world, he had no intention of disarming, as a matter of fact was systematically deceiving inspectors, and so I made the decision, a very difficult decision.
The way forward, which was to remove him from power -- and, by the way, we weren't "alone" going in. As a matter of fact, I talked to Tony Blair this morning, which I do on a regular basis, and Tony Blair saw the same threat. And so now the way ahead is this. We will work with Prime Minister Allawi to enable a political process to develop. In other words, we'll provide as much security as we can to help a political process forward which means elections in January, but more importantly we will train Iraqis so that they are capable of providing their own security, and that's an important ingredient about enabling me to say that troops will be there as long as necessary, but not a day longer -- and by that I mean when the Iraqis are capable of defending themselves and as the political process emerges, we will then be in a position to say the mission has been completed, which is a democratic Iraq, an ally in the war on terror and a source of stability in a part of the world that needs stability and freedom.
RUSH: A couple quick things. I know your time is short. The Democrats -- one voice I know for sure Elliott Spitzer, the attorney general of New York, warned, literally warned the Republicans not to mention the September 11th attacks at the convention.
THE PRESIDENT: (Laughing.) Well, they -- evidently Rudy didn't heed his warnings.
RUSH: (Laughing.) I was going to ask you, because they did. They, of course, were allowed to do what they did on their first right. I thought it was tastefully done last night --
THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you. I tell you, I'm traveling with John McCain; I thought he gave a great speech. Look, September 11th is a defining moment in our history, and it's certainly a defining moment in my presidency, and the question is whether or not we've learned the lessons. Three quick lessons. I've already given you one lesson that I think is important to remember. We deal with threats before they fully materialize. What that means is that in the old days you could see a threat, and you may deal with it or you may not deal with it, but you never thought a threat would come to harm us. Those days are gone.
Secondly, if the United States ever says something we better mean it, and I say, "If you harbor a terrorist, you're just as guilty as a terrorist." When you say something you gotta act on it. And by acting on it not only is Afghanistan free, but the world now knows that we mean what we say, which makes the world a more peaceful place in my judgment, and the third thing is that these killers are people you can't negotiate with. You've got to find them. So that's why I told Matt Lauer what I told him. It's an unconventional war. In other words, these are people that, you know, they use terrorism as a tool to support and promote their ideology of hatred. And, you know, we must bring 'em to justice, and we are. Thursday night I will tell the people that three-quarters of the known Al-Qaeda leadership has been brought to justice. And we're still obviously on the hunt.
RUSH: Okay, final point. I remember your campaign for president, 2000. You mentioned some specific things that you would do if you were elected. One of them was tax cuts, and there were a couple other things. You talked about Social Security reform -- and after you were elected and inaugurated, you set out to proceed to do those things, and I remember reading that the Democrats were surprised that you were actually doing what you said you were gonna do. Now, my last question: are you going to trick them again and actually do in your second term what you're going to campaign on doing? And what is that? What is your agenda the second term?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I'm going to save some of it for the speech if you don't mind.
RUSH: All right.
THE PRESIDENT: I mean, you're a good friend and I would hate to let you down, but --
RUSH: I understand. I understand totally. But I had to ask. I'm curious.
THE PRESIDENT: Having said that -- no, no, I understand completely. Look, what we're going to do is we're going to have government -- look, the world has changed. No longer does just one person, generally a dad, work for the same company and receive a pension plan or health care from the same company. People change jobs. Women are in the workforce and therefore the role of government ought to be to enable people to be able to live in a changing world. Now, that means promoting policies that say you can own your own health care account like health savings accounts, promoting policies that says younger workers should be able to take some of their own money and set up a personal savings account as a part of Social Security, so they can call it their own. They can take it from job to job and they could pass it on to another generation, and so those are the kinds of things I'm going to address. It's how government doesn't give order to people, but how government can enable people to realize dreams in a changing world.
RUSH: Mr. President, thanks so much for your time. It's always an honor and a thrill to speak to you --
THE PRESIDENT: How you feeling? Most importantly.
RUSH: Never better. I've never been happier. I've never been better, and you sound like you're ebullient as well. It's great to hear. I'm getting all kinds of comments about the optimism that was on display last night at the convention. People are very, very upbeat and ecstatic. People wish you the best and they're praying for you every day.
THE PRESIDENT: That's the most important thing people can do is pray, and I appreciate that. I tell you the crowds we're seeing out here are really big. I believe something is going on here in the hinterlands, in the heartland that is going to mean a victory come November, but I want to assure you I'm going to keep working and keep laying out my vision, so people understand exactly why I've made the decisions I've made.
RUSH: Well, make no mistake about something. I can't speak for everybody, but I can speak for quite a few. They love you out there, Mr. President, and they only wish you the best.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, sir.
RUSH: Alright. George W. Bush.
END TRANSCRIPT
Dang it, I'm sorry I missed it! Pesky customers taking me away from an interview like that!
4:33pm and link is working. FYI.
Are you old enough to remember this?
The Dean Clarence Manion Radio Program
May 12, 1957
[REPEAT 1-9-5-7]In the realm of certainty, one thing stands out. The end of the SCANDALOUS GIVEAWAY SPENDING IN WASHINGTON will NOT be accomplished by the official action of either the Democratic Party or the Republican Party as such. When and if it comes to pass, the RESTORATION OF FISCAL SANITY TO OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT will be brought about by the courageous, independent action of Senators and Congressmen of both parties, who put the basic interests of the whole country ahead of party regularity, ahead of political expediency and above the selfish demands of POWERFUL PRESSURE-GROUPS.
On this program two weeks ago, we heard a great Democrat, Senator Harry Byrd of Virginia ask this question: "WHEN BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES ARE PLEDGED TO BIG GOVERNMENT AND BIG SPENDING, whom does that leave to be the watchdog for the people?"
The Senator effectively answered his own question in that remarkable speech. Under such unfortunate political circumstances, the people must rely upon the integrity of such Democrats as Senator Byrd, and the courageous honesty of Republicans like my guest at this microphone tonight.[Barry M. Goldwater of Arizona]
You can hear the rest of it here C-SPAN link
My point is, this criticism about Republican Big Spending has been around for a long long time. I'm not saying that makes it right, but it does put it in perspective.
I understand what you're saying. But we know that President Bush is working to take down legalized abortion, that he signed the ban on partial birth abortion, and that he's doing what he can to nullify the gay marriage thing, etc. Not that Bush is any saviour in my eyes, but the alternative is John F'ng Kerry, and I can say from personal experience that he's a mean spirited pro-abortionist and pro-gay rights goon all the way. I've written to his office about these issues and their replies were not exactly friendly. In fact they were downright arrogant with an 'in-your-face' attitude.
Bush, like all politicians, is saying what needs to be said, and avoiding what needs to be avoided to get elected. Once elected he can continue to work to take down abortion, homosexual 'marriages' and work on other social issues and fight the war on terror. Bush is on the right track and he's the right man for the job, especially considering the times we live in. If you can put together a candidate who possesses a nice blend of Davy Crockett and Saint Francis then I'll vote for him. Until then... Bush is the man.
I understand what you're saying. But we know that President Bush is working to take down legalized abortion, that he signed the ban on partial birth abortion, and that he's doing what he can to nullify the gay marriage thing, etc. Not that Bush is any saviour in my eyes, but the alternative is John F'ng Kerry, and I can say from personal experience that he's a mean spirited pro-abortionist and pro-gay rights goon all the way. I've written to his office about these issues and their replies were not exactly friendly. In fact they were downright arrogant with an 'in-your-face' attitude.
Bush, like all politicians, is saying what needs to be said, and avoiding what needs to be avoided to get elected. Once elected he can continue to work to take down abortion, homosexual 'marriages' and work on other social issues and fight the war on terror. Bush is on the right track and he's the right man for the job, especially considering the times we live in. If you can put together a candidate who possesses a nice blend of Davy Crockett and Saint Francis then I'll vote for him. Until then... Bush is the man.
BUmp for later reading.
My office will never be the same - they thought Rush was over at noon! Go Rush! Thanks for the afternoon audio!
I am old enough to remember this, and I agree that American taxpayers have not had any effective watchdogs for years to protect us from big spenders in government, whatever party they represent.
Site "R", the formerly "undisclosed location" where Cheney was said to be, is very near Gettysburg. Hope that's not a bad omen. Communications should be good there to enable the President to participate "from afar"
I have several "issues" against our President. But I will still vote for him.
The reason being is that I cannot see myself voting for someone that will put us RAPIDLY in the tank. (JFinK)
I may not agree with all of Bush's policies, but at least if he is president it gives us time to change the things do not like.
Regardless of whether you completely support him or not, he is right now, the best choice we have for President of these United States.
Bush signed the partial birth abortion ban and would name judges more amenable to overturning Roe.......who else even comes close to this? certainly not kerry.......
amen.
Yeah Frank, why don't you go somewhere and DIIIIE.
You're such a buzzkill. We can't talk about controversial issues now, we got a political campaign here! ;-)
Well I guess I'm one of those too, while I am still voting for Bush on Nov 2nd, I think its counterproductive and sad to try to censor the asking of difficult questions.
"Would you spend your savings to keep your family alive? Would you go into debt to do it? What "social issues" would you put ahead of your family's wellbeing, Frank? Frank? Fraaaaaannkkk?"
Good post. You nailed it in three simple sentences.
I'm sure he knows it but you must realize he cannot vocalize it, certainly not before the debates. And note that GWB correctly the vote on which Kerry's now famous comment was made.
It's not about revenge. It's about keeping it from happening again, possibly on a much, much larger scale.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.