Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RATHER DIGS IN: THE DOCUMENTS ARE AUTHENTIC
Drudgereport ^ | 9/10/04 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 09/10/2004 10:11:53 AM PDT by Pfesser

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX FRI SEPT 10, 2004 12:01:25 ET XXXXX

RATHER DIGS IN: THE DOCUMENTS ARE AUTHENTIC

CBSNEWS anchor and 60 MINUTES correspondent Dan Rather publicly defended his reporting Friday morning after questions were raised about the authenticity of newly unearthed memos aired on CBS which asserted that George W. Bush ignored a direct order from a superior officer in the Texas Air National Guard.

CNN TRANSCRIPT:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DAN RATHER, CBS NEWS ANCHOR: I know that this story is true. I believe that the witnesses and the documents are authentic. We wouldn't have gone to air if they would not have been. There isn't going to be -- there's no -- what you're saying apology?

QUESTION: Apology or any kind of retraction or...

RATHER: Not even discussed, nor should it be. I want to make clear to you, I want to make clear to you if I have not made clear to you, that this story is true, and that more important questions than how we got the story, which is where those who don't like the story like to put the emphasis, the more important question is what are the answers to the questions raised in the story, which I just gave you earlier.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CBS NEWS executives on Thursday launched an internal investigation into whether its premiere news program 60 MINUTES aired fabricated documents relating to Bush's National Guard service, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. "The reputation and integrity of the entire news division is at stake, if we are in error, it will be corrected," a top CBS source explained late Thursday.

Developing...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushmemos; cbs; killian; rather; rathergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-199 next last
To: Pfesser

Rather is certifiable. (Not that that's news.)

Hopefully this will finally bring about his end.


21 posted on 09/10/2004 10:16:23 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
that more important questions than how we got the story, which is where those who don't like the story like to put the emphasis, the more important question is what are the answers to the questions raised in the story,

But Dan, if the documents are forgeries, then there are no questions to be answered, other than WHO PROVIDED THE FORGED DOCUMENTS!

22 posted on 09/10/2004 10:16:53 AM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

What preponderance?! They consulted one alleged and nameless doc expert, and called some guy who knew Killian and read the memos over the phone to him. Oh, real investigative journalism there all right. NOT.


23 posted on 09/10/2004 10:17:07 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I heard the interview on Rush and Rather sounded like a Dem flack--"Bush needs to answer these questions.." and so forth. He has been totally exposed.


24 posted on 09/10/2004 10:17:09 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

I believe CBS and Rather released the fake documents KNOWING they were probably fake, just to take the spotlight away from the POW Vietnam Vets, who released their documentary DVD this week showing Kerry's 1971 speech before the US Senate really did harm POWS in Vietnam.

That's the way things work.


25 posted on 09/10/2004 10:17:29 AM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
Dan Blather speaks with forked tongue.
26 posted on 09/10/2004 10:17:29 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

27 posted on 09/10/2004 10:18:09 AM PDT by Chieftain (Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

This will be the official spin from CBS

"We don't know whether the documents are forged or not. We are still investigating. But we were wrong to release them without verifying completely and we are sorry for that".

This way, they don't accept responsibility and they can just hope for another story like a hurricane to divert our attention.


28 posted on 09/10/2004 10:18:11 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
Rush also mentioned the relationship between Dan Rather's daughter Robin and Ben Barnes (interviewed by Rather on 60 Minutes) and their Demoncrat fundraising activities in Austin, Texas.


Robin Rather


Ben Barnes

Was Robin Rather and/or Ben Barnes the source of the forged documents?
29 posted on 09/10/2004 10:18:27 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

His opinion over Bush is letting him overlook anything else, what tunnel vision. They're FAKE DOCUMENTS Rather!


30 posted on 09/10/2004 10:18:35 AM PDT by Legion04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman

Too late.

The source may have already been exposed as of 12:06 AM Eastern time...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1211690/posts


31 posted on 09/10/2004 10:18:44 AM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

"I know that this story is true. I believe that the witnesses and the documents are authentic."


"know" != "believe".


God, Dan Rather is an idiot!


32 posted on 09/10/2004 10:18:52 AM PDT by Blzbba (John F'in Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser; Poohbah; Howlin; Buckhead; lowbridge
Bwah hahahahahaha

Go check out drudge and look at the Headline on the Rather story. heheheheh Oh gawd, this is the most fun I've had since I ran naked with the hogs through church services.

33 posted on 09/10/2004 10:18:55 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
Produce the originals, Mr. Rather.

Produce your "experts" Mr. Rather.

Or would you rather not?

34 posted on 09/10/2004 10:19:10 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

Hey, Kenneth! Fish that swallow the hook usually die having it extracted.


35 posted on 09/10/2004 10:19:15 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser

36 posted on 09/10/2004 10:19:21 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Expect CBS to adopt the Tawanna Brawley defense, "what matters is that it could have happened."


37 posted on 09/10/2004 10:19:30 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
"...and that more important questions than how we got the story, which is where those who don't like the story like to put the emphasis, the more important question is what are the answers to the questions raised in the story,..."

Um... I thought the main questions being raised went to the authenticity of the documents. And if they're not authentic, then the "questions raised in the story" are meaningless.
38 posted on 09/10/2004 10:19:30 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
...more important questions than how we got the story...

What could be more important than the integrity of your research Dan?

The "how" is the story, moron...

39 posted on 09/10/2004 10:19:31 AM PDT by Damocles (sword of...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pfesser
That means they came from McAuliffe. Faced with a choice of sticking the Democratic Party with a new Watergate or trying to brazen it out, CBS is choosing the slightly more palatable short-run option.

In the long-run, it will demote the network to be on a par the WB and Paramount.

40 posted on 09/10/2004 10:19:33 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson