Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man named in Bush memo left Guard before document was written
Dallas Morning News ^ | 9-10-04

Posted on 09/10/2004 7:06:51 PM PDT by ambrose

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-224 next last
To: mbarr
Karl Rove did a good job in making up these Doc's !

huh?

121 posted on 09/10/2004 8:09:13 PM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
A CBS staffer stood by the story, suggesting that Staudt could have continued to exert influence over Guard officials. But a former high-ranking Guard official disputed that, saying retirement would have left Staudt powerless over remaining officials.

How in the world would a retired general have any power? That doesn't even pass the laugh test!

122 posted on 09/10/2004 8:09:15 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

I love the smell of lefties pissing in their pants at nite while FR and other media nebulas bust their grapes.


123 posted on 09/10/2004 8:09:58 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

analysis of the bush memo

http://img41.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img41&image=60minbusted.swf


124 posted on 09/10/2004 8:11:32 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name

per Terry McAwfull


125 posted on 09/10/2004 8:11:55 PM PDT by mbarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

By the way, am I the only one who keeps thinking of that "Bloom County" from the 1980s where Opus tried to forge Elvis's diaries but used "Official Dukes of Hazzard Stationery"?


126 posted on 09/10/2004 8:11:59 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

This "memo" is turning out to be quite a gift from the RATs, isn't it? You can only sow for just so long before you start to do some reaping. They have sown the wind. They will reap the whirlwind! Natural justice can be a beautiful thing to see.


127 posted on 09/10/2004 8:13:19 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." (Eccl. 10:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"Killian says Col. Buck Staudt, the man in charge of the Texas Air National Guard, is putting on pressure to `sugar coat' an evaluation of Lt. Bush."

WHY does he refer to him as "COL." since they knew eachother he must of called him BUCK??? and he NEVER would call him "Col.Buck" in a memmo to himself... it'd just be Buck

128 posted on 09/10/2004 8:13:30 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

oops... (he he he)


129 posted on 09/10/2004 8:16:03 PM PDT by Libertina (Thank God we have President Bush in the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolitaryMan
If I get this right, the memo's were written in Times Roman font, but the military (per DOD instruction) has always used Courier 12. Has anyone else seen any official documents written in Times Roman?

I haven't. Even the document with the th in it that Dan Rather used as evidence was in Courier. If there were comparable documents done in Times Roman, CBS would point those out. But they haven't.

130 posted on 09/10/2004 8:20:04 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: plushaye

"Staudt is ALIVE and currently not responding to telephone calls to his home. He might come charging out (like Killian's widow and son) to speak to the press after being maligned by CBS staffers who didn't even know him."
Maybe he is consulting with his lawyers....to see just how much he can sue Rather and CBS for "defamation of character".


131 posted on 09/10/2004 8:20:04 PM PDT by Winfield (sham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
RATHERGATE ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

132 posted on 09/10/2004 8:21:29 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Comrade Hillary - 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart; Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper; NYC GOP Chick; cyborg; firebrand

Smoking gun ping!


133 posted on 09/10/2004 8:23:15 PM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Rather: "Until and unless someone shows me definitive proof that they are not (genuine), I don't see any reason to carry on a conversation with the professional rumor mill."

This is stunning in both its audacity and mendacity. It is up to the public to "prove" the veracity of the output of the media?????

Isn't the media to take all reasonable steps to ensure the veracity of its output prior to publishing or broadcasting it?

All this is right out of "1984". George Orwell only missed by twenty years. I hope that some plaintiff attorneys seek further elucidation by the distinguished Rather and his pack.
134 posted on 09/10/2004 8:23:32 PM PDT by mtntop3 ("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
South, hope You don't mind me nitpiking some of your points, but I want to make some minor corrections as a current military member (USAF 23 years). I cannot vouch for procedures in 1972, but just want to clear up some things as they are done today.

6--Signature block. Typical authentic military signature block has name, then rank, then on the next line the person's position. This just has rank beneath the name.

Correct (Almost) - Official Military signature block is as follows
Name, RANK, DEPARTMENT (IE USAF, TXANG)
Title
Killians signature block would have been
Jerry B. Killian, Lt Col, TXANG Commander

8 -- Date usually with three letters, or in form as 110471.

YEs and no. Usually would be 18 Aug 1972, but could be written 18 August 1972 -- it is Writers prerogative. However You never see 04 MAY 1972, it would be 4 MAY 1972. 04 would only be used on COMPUTERIZED forms where 2 digits are required.

19 - Box 34567 is suspicious, at best. The current use of the po box 34567 is Ashland Chemical Company, A Division of Ashland Oil, Incorporated P. O. Box 34567 Houston (this has been confirmed by the Pentagon, per James Rosen on Fox News-However, many documents on John Kerry’s website show same)

PO BOX is legit (see posts above), but was for 147 FIG not 111 FIS.

21 - Bush's grade would "normally" be abbreviated "1Lt" not "1st Lt"

Exactly. KIllians would have been Lt Col not Lt. Colonel

23 - Air Force did not use street addresses for their offices, rather HQ AFLC/CC, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433.

Don't know about 1972 but today all Correspondence/letterhead MUST contain the street address of the unit. WOuld be in the format HQ AFLC/CC, 101 Something St., Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433 26 - Language not generally used by military

I have certainly never used language like that

28 - Not in any format that a military person would use, e.g. orders not given by Memo.

Offical orders have a set format, However a Direct order from Supervisor/commander to subordinate can be written in a MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD, with a SUBJECT line of something like "Order to report for Physical"

A Memo with a direct order would however not just be signed by the Commander/supervisor it would also have a ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECIEPT on the bottom of the page SIGNED by the person recieving the order!

36-Acronym should be ORT, not ORET

Doc refers to OETR, correct abbreviation is OER - Officer Evaluation Report. Have never heard of an OETR.

40-The forged documents had no initials from a clerk

Would only have clerk initials if they were officially filed in the persons PIF (Personal Information File). If they were personal Memo's they might not be initialed.

41-There was no CC list (needed for orders)

Correct to the best of my knowledge

42-Subject line in memos was normally CAPITALIZED in the military

Word SUBJECT would be capitalized, the actual subject of the memo would be typed in upper and lower case.

43-The forged documents used incorrect terminology ("physical examination" instead of "medical")

Correct. We get Medical Examinations not Physical Examinations. Actually today they are Periodic Health Assessments _ LOL.

44-There was no "reciept confirmation box" (required for orders)

Correct , as I stated above there would have been an acknowledgement line for Bush to sign.

47-the manual cited in the first forged document on line 2 of the first point #1 of "AFM 35-13" doesn't exist. That line of text reads: "to conduct annual physical examination (flight)IAW AFM 35-13". "IAW" means "In Accordance With" and "AFM 35-13" would mean "Air Force Manual 35-13". There is no such Air Force Manual 35-13.

There is currently no AFM 35-13. I believe there was one back then, I have seen references to it before.

135 posted on 09/10/2004 8:24:44 PM PDT by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; SLB; Cannoneer No. 4; Fred Mertz; hellinahandcart; NYC GOP Chick
"A CBS staffer stood by the story, suggesting that Staudt could have continued to exert influence over Guard officials. But a former high-ranking Guard official disputed that, saying retirement would have left Staudt powerless over remaining officials."

This happens quite quickly in the military (both green suiter and civilian). A week or two is all it takes for all the power somebody used to have to be rendered impotent after "retirement".

I've seen it happen firsthand.

136 posted on 09/10/2004 8:25:54 PM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red; hellinahandcart

That's funny!


137 posted on 09/10/2004 8:28:03 PM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: commish
"There is currently no AFM 35-13. I believe there was one back then, I have seen references to it before."

You've seen "AFM 35-13" or you've seen "AFR 35-13"?

"AFR" should mean Air Force Regulation, but that's not what was at least TWICE typed in to the forgeries.

1 Full Legislative Day Left Until The AWB Expires

138 posted on 09/10/2004 8:29:27 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Winfield
Maybe he is consulting with his lawyers....to see just how much he can sue Rather and CBS for "defamation of character".

I was thinking that the Killian Family might have grounds to sue.....I heard the son, Gary on H & C say that See BC interviewed him & his step-mother before the story was aired.

He said they both told CBS that they had grave doubts about the memos....that Killian had always spoken highly of GWB and that Killian did not write 'personal memos' like those Rather used.

He added that they were shocked that CBS never reported what they said in the 60 Minutes program.

139 posted on 09/10/2004 8:30:45 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (I trust NOBODY BUT BUSH! Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ZOTnot

Quit using my tagline ;-).


140 posted on 09/10/2004 8:34:07 PM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson