Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion Activist Admits Abortion Issue Doesn't Drive Women Voters
Life News ^ | 21 July 2004 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 09/25/2004 7:43:07 PM PDT by Lorianne

Imagine you're the head of a women's group that backs abortion. In your quest to elect candidates who agree with your position, you're likely to talk up the importance of the issue to your membership and how they are excited to vote for like-minded candidates.

Yet, the political director of a nationally renown pro-abortion organization told the Christian Science Monitor newspaper that abortion is not an issue that drive women voters -- nor is it their top priority.

Karen White of Emily's List, a political organization that backs pro-abortion candidates, says abortion "is not an issue where a woman wakes up every morning and says, 'I am going to look up what my candidate thinks on abortion.'"

"Now, while it may be an important issue, and she may have a very strong opinion about it, [it] is not what is driving her to vote," White admitted.

In fact, White told the Monitor newspaper that the top issue for women is the war in Iraq and the number one issue for women swing voters is health care.

Perhaps White is acknowledging a June 2003 poll conducted by the Center for the Advancement of Women, which also backs abortion.

The survey found that 51% took a pro-life position opposing most or all abortions while only thirty percent said it should be generally available.

The poll also found that keeping abortion legal was the next to last most important priority for women. Fewer than half (41%) cite preserving abortion as a priority -- down from 49 percent in 2001.

In comparison, 92% list domestic violence and assault as a primary concern. A close second (90%) is equal pay for equal work. Also of greater importance to women is the ability to take time off to care for family (74%), reducing drug & alcohol addiction (72%) and increasing women's study of math, science, and technology (66%).

Jennifer Bingham of the Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life group that works to elect pro-life women to public office, tells LifeNews.com the media has painted a false impression that a majority of women support abortion.

"Poll after poll is showing that more and more American women are classifying themselves as pro-life," Bingham said. "After 30 years of the message that 'choice' means a women's right to choose an abortion -- women are finally expressing choice as the right to have a child."

Meanwhile, an October 2003 poll conducted by Emily's List found that President Bush does just as well with women voters as with, at the time, an unnamed Democratic presidential candidate.

Among women, 42 percent said they would likely support the Democratic nominee while 39 percent said they would back President Bush.

In 1996, Bill Clinton defeated Bob Dole by 16 percent among women voters. Bush cut the so-called "gender gap" to 11 in 2000.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; emilyslist; issues; napalminthemorning; politics; proaborts; womensvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 09/25/2004 7:43:07 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

The abortion issue drives MY vote. I vote prolife.


2 posted on 09/25/2004 7:46:11 PM PDT by I still care (Proud member of the FR branch of the Pajama brigade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

it has been millions of years of evolution and we are hunters and gatherers...... the women are concerned about security during the time of war..... it is that simple... can our tribe survive and can i and my children....

they worry about home..... security... children.... other families... then food shelter.... basics.....


3 posted on 09/25/2004 7:47:42 PM PDT by Gibtx (Wow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
How amazing that most women aren't libertine party sluts who need frequent abortions, and they actually recognise the birth of their children as the happiest day in their lives.

This is shocking to liberals!!!

4 posted on 09/25/2004 7:48:30 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Karen White of Emily's List, a political organization that backs pro-abortion candidates, says abortion "is not an issue where a woman wakes up every morning and says, 'I am going to look up what my candidate thinks on abortion.'"

While radical feminists are the exception, I always wondered how many women voted for a candidate because some day they might want to kill their child. I just don't think taht they constitute a large population.

5 posted on 09/25/2004 7:49:06 PM PDT by Grey Ghost II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
It's probably the circles in which I move, but I don't know any women who won't vote for a candidate because he is pro-life (even if they think abortion should be legal), but I know quite a few women who would never vote for a candidate who was pro-choice. They'd stay home given a choice between two pro-choice candidates.

The most ardently pro-life people I know are women. It doesn't surprise me that 51% of women would vote to ban most or all abortions. The other thing that the GOP should realize that many socially conservative women are motivated to vote and be politically active ONLY because of their social concerns. Their husbands might still be motivated to vote GOP on the basis of taxes, regulation, and military spending, but many women connect most deeply on the social issues.

Another reason why, to win elections, a Republican candidate needs to appeal to every part of the conservative coalition: needs to be tax-cutting, smaller government, socially conservative, strong on national defense, pro-2nd amendment, etc...

6 posted on 09/25/2004 7:57:10 PM PDT by Agrarian (The 2nd most important race of the year is in SD-- but Coburn in OK is where money now needs to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

It isn't that simple I think.

I think many many women say they are anti-abortion, but they quietly support the status quo of abortion on demand.

Whether it's a fear that their daughter gets pregnant, or an otherwise chaste housewife finds herself in a bit of a predicament after a lingering visit by an anonymous UPS guy, I think many women say one thing to pollsters on the issue, but quietly like the 'easy out' to what they consider an inconvenient (or inexplicable) pregnancy.

I think it's terrible, but I think its true.


7 posted on 09/25/2004 7:58:00 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

"How amazing that most women aren't libertine party sluts who need frequent abortions..."

No wonder my approach hasn't been working!


8 posted on 09/25/2004 7:58:12 PM PDT by Socratic (Kerry/Edwards - Forging a New Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Meanwhile...in real life...most women who are putatively pro choice are actually very much pro-life.
They just don't want women who are unmarried and pregnant to be stoned to death for being pregnant outside of marriage.
Funny how "abortion" has become such a divisive political issue.
As if any woman really seeks the "legal right" to abort the product of her womb.
9 posted on 09/25/2004 8:00:11 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

"Funny" how someone can fail to see that some people would find that the convenience killing an unborn child, the product of a women's womb, would be repulsive and wrong.


10 posted on 09/25/2004 8:11:21 PM PDT by gscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Women who have abortions should be denied Social Security benefits. If they choose to reduce the work force that would support them in their "old age" then they should forgo the payments. Why should a woman that had children share her benefits with the "baby killers"?


11 posted on 09/25/2004 8:41:25 PM PDT by Blake#1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blake#1

The "coat hanger" symbol now means nothing to the women that rats are trying to scare into voting rat. Women in the "abortion age" just don't understand what the rats are babbling about.


12 posted on 09/26/2004 6:50:08 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 ( Kerry's not "one of us": catholicsagainstkerry.com. needs your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

The Selfish Generation which drives all policy on the Left is advancing out of the child-bearing years. As soon as the Boomers hit menopause, it is not at all surprising that they lose interest in the whole issue of abortion. Breast Cancer will be a much hotter topic in the next few years, along with government mandated HRT pumped into the water supply.


13 posted on 09/27/2004 3:34:48 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (As a good Jihadi tells his son: Remember, the red wire must never shake hands with the green wire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Election 2004 threads on FR

14 posted on 09/27/2004 9:25:55 AM PDT by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

I am pro-choice not pro-abortion. I think women are smart enough to decide how to handle their pregnancies. I also think it's unfair of you to characterize every woman who seeks abortion as a "libertine party slut" who aborts at the drop of the hat. Sometimes women are raped, sometimes birth control fails, and sometimes a girl is ignorant and gets pregnant at 13. Better birth control, the morning after pill, getting men to take more responsibility for birth control, and offering a pregnant woman some kindness and support so she won't abort could go a long way. The alternative, to outlaw abortion will only kill women. Unfortunately abortion has been around for a long time; it was made illegal and women died. Plus, do we really want to start policing pregnant women? How is that consistent with a free society? Only if women were being forced by the state to abort, like in China, could I be for outlawing abortion. But every woman has the freedom to not have abortion or to have one. FREEDOM, CHOICE being the operative words here. P.S. I am no liberal.


15 posted on 11/04/2004 4:05:49 PM PST by iheartusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: iheartusa
The alternative, to outlaw abortion will only kill women.

Not outlawing it has killed 42 million kids so far.

16 posted on 11/04/2004 4:10:50 PM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Do you honestly believe that if a holocaust of children was going on in this country that everyone, libs, conservatives, mods, whomever, and especially women, wouldn't say it's murder and rise up to do something about it? I don't happen to believe that fetuses are children. They are on their way to being children and live as children in the minds of happily expectant parents, but have no yet achieved personhood. Lot's of people believe as I do, people of many faiths believe as I do. But are you ready to start policing pregnant women in a free society? Are you ready to tell me here and now that a fetus is more important than the woman on whom it depends for life? Are you ready to tell me that you don't care if women die if abortion is outlawed? That they're all filthy sluts that deserve to die because of their indiscretion, whether that indiscretion be rape, incest, or just having a body weakened by diabetes or heart disease? Just let me know.


17 posted on 11/04/2004 4:19:36 PM PST by iheartusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: iheartusa

You've had an abortion.


18 posted on 11/04/2004 4:23:05 PM PST by JusPasenThru (Kerry: Carter without the competence, Clinton without the integrity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru

No, I haven't.


19 posted on 11/04/2004 4:24:48 PM PST by iheartusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: iheartusa

I have two lovely daughters, age 22 and 21 (we fell for the line that breast-feeding is contraceptive). The oldest is married now - praise God - but the younger is single and still in college. It is unimaginable that her parents would ever advise her to abort. She would never consider it. As a physician, I've seen way too many post-abortion trauma disorder cases to think that there is anything benign about abortion. It's just evil. And its destroyed far more than it was supposed to have preserved.


20 posted on 11/04/2004 5:03:06 PM PST by JusPasenThru (The Democrats need to get over their love affair with abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson