Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIPP Tracking poll 10/15/04 Bush 47% Kerry 44, Bush 47%-43% 2 way.
TIPP ^

Posted on 10/15/2004 9:13:31 AM PDT by slowhand520

With all the polls today I think the "Big Mo" is coming our way


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brownshirtsforkerry; dncoperative; howtostealanelection; kewl; md4bush; polls; rattroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: MD4Bush
I notice you only posted the private emails you received from NCPAC without your responses. Verrrry interesting. Why not post your part in the conversation for context? Perhaps it would show that you were "baiting"?

I suspect that you are, yourself, a Washington Post reporter, or are closely associated to the reporters who broke this manufactured story. At the very least, not identifying yourself as such is a serious ethical lapse. But of course, we've come to expect 'ethical lapses' from the old media.

It's very likely that the owners of this site can track down who you are, and the fact that you publicly posted emails sent to you in private without the consent of the party that sent them may open you up to criminal charges. Hope you know a good lawyer.
41 posted on 02/11/2005 9:41:01 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc sign, vinces )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MD4Bush
These freepmails look like forgeries, jerk. Here is what MD4Bush posted:

Re: TIPP Tracking poll...
From NCPAC | 10/15/2004 2:08:44 PM PDT replied

However, this is how a freepmail reply is formatted:

Re: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
From XXXXXXX | 02/10/2005 5:42:31 PM EST read

Not, replied, read. Plus MD4Bush put in formatting that is not available in freepmails.

42 posted on 02/11/2005 9:41:46 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Smoked one out. How many other moles are out there?


43 posted on 02/11/2005 9:43:31 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Does anyone think that JimRob should waive his privacy policy in this case and release the identity of MD4Bush, since the poster obviously was acting in bad faith? We should discuss the pros and cons of this.


44 posted on 02/11/2005 9:43:32 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I believe that users' IDs are subpoenable with search warrants. So the ethics of voluntarily IDing someone who has acted in truly bad faith, has contacted other media with FReepmails, and the like, are to me justifiable. MD4BUSH is no longer someone who I would protect via the privacy policy. Things have their limits.


45 posted on 02/11/2005 9:46:23 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Notice something else about his three posts of alleged freepmails from NCPAC? In all three cases, MD4Bush posted them to himself. Someone searching for posts from NCPAC via a screenname lookup for NCPAC would not have found these posts. Yet WBAL had these linked shortly after MD4Bush posted them. Which to me is a strong indication that MD4Bush posted them and then tipped off reporters as to where they were.


46 posted on 02/11/2005 9:47:08 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Wow. Thanks for noting this. Even more evil than I had imagined. Shameful! Utterly shamful!


47 posted on 02/11/2005 9:48:01 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I wholeheartedly agree.


48 posted on 02/11/2005 9:48:46 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

This may be the smoking gun:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1300213/posts

Posted by MD4Bush to NCPAC
On News/Activism 12/13/2004 7:21:28 AM PST 71 of 149

Amazing that they could take Kerick down sooooo easily-- yet O'Malley still roams unscathed. Should send a note to Kerick, Baltimore is looking for a Police commissioner, it doesn't matter if you cheat on your wife.


49 posted on 02/11/2005 9:55:11 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

More:

MD4Bush
Since Oct 7, 2004


view home page, enter name:

~ About ~ Links ~ Contact ~ In Forum ~ Mail To ~

Return

I hate John Kerry and I'm sick of his lies. This is the most important election in history and George bush must win. If not the Islamic Terrorists will win, there will be more attacks on the states.




http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1244087/posts

Karl Rove on the Tony Snow Show (Confident!)
Posted by MD4Bush to NCPAC
On News/Activism 10/14/2004 1:15:13 PM PDT ? 100 of 102

There was a great article in the atlantic (lib mag my wife reads) about Rove. The writer whines all about Rove?s tricks, but they work and he is a genius. He got a rumor started about this dem judge who gave a lot of money to a charity for kids, so they took those pictures of the judge with the kids and said he was a gay pedophile. It worked.

Check it out: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200411/green


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1174344/posts

O'Malley Rumours
Posted by MD4Bush to Dahoser
On News/Activism 10/08/2004 8:30:19 AM PDT ? 75 of 80

Yeah, he cheats on his wife. I heard that he is not allowed in the house and is living in some new high-rise near city hall. He's is a young arrogant punk for sure. I can't him, he is like Slick-Willy.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1232358/posts

Debate #1: How Did They Do?
Posted by MD4Bush to NCPAC
On News/Activism 10/07/2004 1:22:16 PM PDT ? 58 of 58

You are right about the "yes men", What can we expect this friday as far as the questions go... Do you know? Will it be a snoozer? Chenney kicked Edwards butt. It was like "Who do you want a heart beat away from the prez, Mickey mouse or George Patton. Of course, CBS (might as well call them DNC) said Edwards won.


50 posted on 02/11/2005 10:03:39 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
Yeah, he cheats on his wife.

So MD4Bush was pushing the wife-cheating rumor on FR the morning after he signed on. And trolled for someone to pull into his web.

51 posted on 02/11/2005 10:06:57 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Even his home page sounds like a troll smoke screen.


52 posted on 02/11/2005 10:07:48 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo; Howlin; Miss Marple; Lazamataz

Ping to a source of the NCPAC slime campaign - carried out right here on FR - and MD4Bush is looking more and more like a troll of the worst kind.


53 posted on 02/11/2005 10:19:03 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

If you reply, the read goes from read to reply.


54 posted on 02/11/2005 10:21:37 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; hipaatwo; Howlin; Miss Marple; Lazamataz

Come on over to this thread folks:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1341174/posts

Thanks!


55 posted on 02/11/2005 10:22:37 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520; All

We're Doomed! Can you say President Kerry. DOH!


56 posted on 02/11/2005 10:23:11 AM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Thanks, I stand corrected.

What that does demonstrate, however, is that MD4Bush was actively continuing the correspondence - it wasn't just NCPAC sending stuff to MD4Bush that he didn't reply to.

57 posted on 02/11/2005 10:26:40 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness

Why was that not removed?

I have always understood that posting Freepmail was a bannable offense. Am I wrong?


58 posted on 02/11/2005 10:28:44 AM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
JimRob put it back up, because he apparently wants a historical record of what MD4Bush did - and also has some interesting info on MD4Bush that is just crying for someone to subpeona it.

Methinks this stunt is gonna blow up in someone's face, big-time.

59 posted on 02/11/2005 10:35:32 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Click on the link in post #55.


60 posted on 02/11/2005 10:36:23 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson