Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEAL BITES KERRY
A. L. "Steve" Nash, MAC Ret, UDT/SEAL SEAL Authentication Team

Posted on 10/16/2004 7:45:26 AM PDT by longfellow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Victoria Delsoul

That's a good quote from the U.S. Constitution that you cited there. Someone out there must know what's in those records of his.


41 posted on 10/16/2004 11:01:34 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mike-o-Matic

That's 'F'ed up! HAHAHAHa


42 posted on 10/16/2004 11:05:48 AM PDT by longfellow (You're either with US or from Hollywood! Ultimateamerican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Imnotalib; Fruitbat; longfellow
The "General or Less Than Honorable Discharge," is simply the best of several plausible reasons for Kerry not releasing his records.

There are his Fitness Reports, some of which I have been led to believe do not even give him the courtesy of "Damning him with faint praise." (as do several of my own) He did release the favorable ones!

Then there are the ONI and FBI reports as attachments. Medical reports. The Trip to Paris to talk with the NVNM negotiators, etc. So let's give "Long Devil*" his due:

Kerry has been absolutely brilliant at
sidestepping this whole issue. It was easy. W let him.

* "Long Devil" was Kerry's Bones handle. W's was "Temporary."

43 posted on 10/16/2004 11:23:08 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

keep in mind that George Bush didn't acknowledge the accusations that he was AWOL either, and I don't believe those accusations were true


44 posted on 10/16/2004 11:28:40 AM PDT by Imnotalib (Kerry-Edwards=Liar-thief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Someone out there must know what's in those records of his.

Yeah, Kerry!

45 posted on 10/16/2004 12:55:17 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (Kerry's total disregard for the troops' safety is of no consequence to him - Vietnam, and now Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Imnotalib
keep in mind that George Bush didn't acknowledge the accusations that he was AWOL either

He didn't, but his spokespeople did. Vehemently and categorically. Kerry's haven't. Gee, wonder why?

46 posted on 10/16/2004 1:04:54 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
"The Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, states, "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President .. having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." "

How is it possible that we are coming this close to having a President elected, who has been shown to be a traitor to his country?

Kerry met with the enemy in Paris in 1971. He worked with a group to stop the war while he was in uniform, for crying out loud.

How can the Powers That Be have allowed this to happen?

47 posted on 10/17/2004 3:26:31 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell

Hard to believe, isn't it? I guess the media has a lot to do with it. It is their responsibility to report the news, and as you can see, Kerry is protected by the liberal media. Thank God for the internet and places like FR.


48 posted on 10/17/2004 3:34:44 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (Kerry's total disregard for the troops' safety is of no consequence to him - Vietnam, and now Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

Bump for later.


49 posted on 10/17/2004 3:37:28 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

BUMP I hope this is found, copied, and sent to ALL the press. Leak or no, We the People have a need to know this candidate's military record. After all - we have even looked at the dental background of our President.


50 posted on 10/17/2004 3:41:29 PM PDT by Libertina (10 Little Lying MSM Networks. CBS & ABC went down, soon there'll be none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Yes, thank God for the internet and FR, now if only more people would pay attention.

I'm really worried about this, it doesn't make sense that this man has gotten so far along in the election process.

Of course, there were some people in the early 90s who knew exactly what clinton was all about, and he made it to the top.

Sad.


51 posted on 10/17/2004 3:42:14 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
Of course, there were some people in the early 90s who knew exactly what clinton was all about, and he made it to the top.

Yep, and the Republicans were mean and eeeeeevil for pointing it out. We can't win.

52 posted on 10/17/2004 3:48:09 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (Kerry's total disregard for the troops' safety is of no consequence to him - Vietnam, and now Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

I was hoping that it was a RABID SEAL.


53 posted on 10/17/2004 3:49:39 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

Hillary has Kerry's service records and will use them to make certain that he only serves one term as President and that she is the Democratic Presidential nominee in 2008.


54 posted on 10/17/2004 3:59:03 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johca
His first foreign policy action as a freshman senator in 1985 was to visit with Sandinista officials to include three hours of direct and personal negation with Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega. This was also a direct violation of federal code and sections of the U.S. Constitution.

OK, Bush promised not to go after him for Viet Nam. I guess that made his actions post-Viet Nam also hands-off. But why didn't Bush or Cheney talk about the above Senatorial behavior, in any of the debates?

55 posted on 10/17/2004 4:08:52 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Yep, and the Republicans were mean and eeeeeevil for pointing it out. We can't win.

Ha! I just wrote nearly the same thing you mention, on another post.

The dems have all the angles covered.

They've boxed the republicans in.

56 posted on 10/17/2004 5:23:26 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

OK, Bush promised not to go after him for Viet Nam. I guess that made his actions post-Viet Nam also hands-off. But why didn't Bush or Cheney talk about the above Senatorial behavior, in any of the debates?

It is hard to show relevance and also not an isolated character flaw of an inexperienced freshman Senator if a pattern cannot be established. No way for the President and current administration to know about a confidential service action that was never made public. The dismissal is nothing but speculation based on discrepancies of service records Senator Kerry has made public and people knowledge of military Uniformed Code of Military Justice. To much political risk to bring up possible dismissal without knowing documents exist to back it up.

However, I certainly want to know before I vote and I think other responsible voter would want to know the truth about a dismissal upgraded to honarable discharge before they vote too.


57 posted on 10/17/2004 6:46:19 PM PDT by johca (Kerry is subject to Article 104 of the code even in inactive duty statue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: reg45

I am sure you are right but she is running out of time!


58 posted on 10/18/2004 9:36:48 AM PDT by longfellow (You're either with US or from Hollywood! Ultimateamerican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: reg45

That's good!


59 posted on 10/18/2004 9:37:22 AM PDT by longfellow (You're either with US or from Hollywood! Ultimateamerican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson