Posted on 10/26/2004 1:45:29 PM PDT by ARCADIA
You are a troll.
bump
I only scanned Sullivan's article and found numerous factual errors and extremely weak arguments.
Those who claim Sullivan only opposes Bush because he of the gay marriage issue might well be right.
Do any conservatives look at his blog any more? Every time I take a peek, I just see warmed-over DNC talking points and interminable rants on the gay rights movement. Not much factual accuracy or historical knowledge. A complete waste of time.
The idea that putting women's panties on prisoner's heads gives a moral victory to those who feed people through plastic shredders and saw their heads off in videos is beyond absurd.
Is Sullivan trying to make us laugh on purpose or what?
The absence of WMDs is just a miserable failure, pure and simple.
Not anticipating the strength of the insurgency - also a major mistake
I have a hard time getting past these two issues as well
One of the biggest factors in the Iraq situation is overlooked by many critics, and Andrew Sullivan overlooks it as well:
The American opposition party, and the American media (but I repeat myself...), were both willing to commit treason in order to regain political power.
Dozens of American soldiers and hundreds of innocent Iraqis have paid with their lives for the aid and comfort given to the insurgents by the Democrats in Congress and in the media.
If people who worked for your company were allowed to sabotage the operations of your company for the promise of better jobs and higher pay, what do you think your place of business would look like?
It would be an unholy shambles, wouldn't it?
BTW - if Kerry gains power through these machinations, he'd better remember that TWO can play that game, and we're more practiced at tubing a corrupt administration.
Great. Thanks for saying so well.
Andrew Sullivan is a gay, partisan hack.
People don't fall for this nonsense. Don't worry.
Not anticipating the strength of the insurgency - also a major mistake
I have a hard time getting past these two issues as well
With that mentality, you'd have been begging for a truce in Spring, 1943 -- after Kasserine Pass.
Fortunately, you weren't (and aren't) in charge.
Did I see a link on Sullivan's website to "Fisting Saffire"?
This creep has let his faggotry take him around the bend.
He won't be missed.
There is a reason you popped in here, and it's not to tell us that you are supporting President Bush.
You live in a place that encourages perverted sexuality. The people that are encouraging you to practice this unnatural self-gratification do not care about YOU; the only thing they want is a piece of your a**.
You're welcome here, but know that we will do everything in our power to bring you back into the fold of God's natural law and love.
Both Sullivan and Hitchens are leftists...socialists...they wanted an excuse to support Kerry
and the problems of the Iraq occupation have given them one...they were never our friends.
Okay. I consider myself fairly conservative and libertarian. I share some of Sullivan's problems with Bush, such as Bush's out of control spending and increase in the size of government, and his suppport of a constitutional amendment defining marriage.
Thank you!
The war planners - they were thinking of bringing the troop number to 30,000 two months after "mission accomplished"
I don't think the prison scandal is that bad and IMHO, I don't Arabs think its that bad. Nothing like what their prisons are like.
Rooting is not the same thing as abetting!
The intelligence agencies are part of the executive branch. Sorry, this is no excuse; it happened on his watch.
Is he supposed to have a crystal ball and known that Iraq's military would fold so quickly and disappear into the populace?
Come on! Even I considered that possibility!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.