Posted on 11/04/2004 7:49:22 PM PST by conelrad
Even before he became George Bush's Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld was spooked about a "space Pearl Harbor" – a surprise attack on America's satellites. Now that he's headed for a likely second term at the Pentagon, Rumsfeld and his deputies are getting even more jittery about a hostile strike in orbit.
To begin with, nobody at the Pentagon – nobody anywhere, in fact – really has a firm grasp on what's actually out there, circling the Earth. There are dozens of satellites, thousands of pieces of man-made debris, as well as an array of space rocks. But no one's quite sure of where, exactly, it all is.
Aviation Week quotes a "nightmare" that the country's top military space officer sometimes shares with his colleagues: "A phone call from the White House asking, 'What happened to our satellite? And what are you doing about it?' With few exceptions, today's response will be the same as a former Cincspace [Command-in-Chief of Space Operations] gave the Vice President several years ago: 'We don't know, and there's not much we can do."'
Everyone agrees that the first step to satellite defense is to get some sort of sense of what's happening in orbit. But the job of setting up this "Space Situational Awareness" has been bogged down in the bureaucratic muck. "There are now "99 organizations participating in 79 different meetings, conferences or forums, while using 91 separate SSA tools and systems -- [all] stovepiped and on their own course," Rear Adm. Thomas Zelibor, global operations director for U.S. Strategic Command, told Aviation Week.
In Rumsfeld's "space Pearl Harbor" report, the once-and-future Defense Secretary worried about adversaries attacking U.S. satellite ground stations, jamming GPS signals, or even setting off a nuclear bomb in space. Rumsfeld also warned about enemies developing ground-based lasers, or anti-satellite spacecraft that might, one day, be able to take out American orbiters.
But these "alarmist judgment[s] [are] not based on the available evidence," Jeffrey Lewis argues in Arms Control Today. "Indeed, a fair reading of unclassified intelligence estimates and the Pentagon’s own official statements suggest countries are not investing the time, money, and energy needed for such efforts."
Ground-based lasers that can strike into space – that's more science fiction than science, Lewis says. Russia, the only country to test anti-satellites, last did so in 1982. And American satellites have, so far, shown themselves impervious to jamming.
The Defense Department is less than reassured, however. Late last month, the Air Force officials declared their first anti-satellite weapon -- a radio frequency-based jammer -- ready to go.
THERE'S MORE: TM Lutas cautions against "overlooking a credible threat."
While no nation-state seems to be concentrating on anti-satellite weaponry, that does not mean that there is no threat. Hijacking an upcoming launch and loading low-tech threats like ball bearings for orbital deployment is something that needs to be countered...
There is no reason to panic or have a crash program but there are credible, growing threats in my opinion and they will multiply as private orbital rocketry becomes popular and lift costs drop... I don't think it's unrealistic to start thinking about stuff that is in the 20 year time horizon.
Laser weapons are not science fiction. However, trying to fire them through the Earth's atmosphere a long distances (to space) and expecting them to do much is another story.
Sounds like the DoD needs to get their Space Command together. Well now that you have a mandate, go do it!!
Jeffrey Lewis is the one that is misinformed about evidence, not Mr. Rumsfeld.
It has long been known one or two nuclear blasts at the right altitude in space above the CONUS would black out everything with a transistor from computers to car engines to gas pumps.
And that is just one scenario...
Personally, I enjoy having a "paranoid" Secretary of Defense and I'm hopeful Rummy stays...now as for Powell....
I must say, looking through a 12.5mm eyepiece through a 10" scope at a field of view only a few arc minutes in diameter, there sure seems to be a lot of objects crossing the field of view nowadays. It's pretty damn amazing, almost scary.
Interesting.
Space Ping.
Another important-but-never-discussed issue during this election. Space and defense, this is an area that requires long term vision and Kerry was absolutely AWOL on this issue. Now we'll move ahead on SDI and return to the moon before China stakes any claims on it.
Not so sure about that. I understood that some huge number of natural and man-made orbital debris pieces are systematically tracked on radar, down to the size of a golf-ball and with centimeter-precision. I don't recall where I read that, but it was an official claim (not just a blog or some conspiracy site).
I don't think so.
Make it happen Rummy
Loose lips and all that, but I am not worried about this.
You'll just have to trust me.
It has long been known one or two nuclear blasts at the right altitude in space above the CONUS would black out everything with a transistor from computers to car engines to gas pumps.BS.
Were this true HALF the US would be non-functional at any given time due to THUNDERSTORMS just moving tangentially through an area ...
BTTT
I don't think so.I don't know about "centimeter-precision" but I could believe within some number of feet (computed using a 'computer orbital solution' obtained over a series of days) - using a system named NAVSPASPUR ...
I'd be happier if we could make enough small arms ammo for our troops so that its not rationed, put a few thousand armored humvees in Iraq within months and put armor on several thousand heavy truck pronto.
This isn't paranoid at all.
China, in particular, is within reach of taking out many of our satellites if they chose to do so.
It's obviously good practice to stay ahead of the curve and develop defenses before its too late.
Is it possible, or legal to send ammo to troops in Iraq? Good stuff that is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.