Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is It Different When France Does It?
War to Mobilize Democracy, LLC ^ | 11/6/04 | Andrew L. Jaffee

Posted on 11/06/2004 4:22:07 PM PST by forty_years

9 French troops and a U.S. citizen were killed when Ivory Coast fighter planes bombed a rebel position in the north of that country. The French have hit back, destroying 5 Ivorian helicopters and 2 bombers near the capital city of Yamoussoukro. Ivorians aren’t happy with France’s reprisals. Angry mobs are rioting, looting French properties, and yelling “Everybody get your Frenchman!” and “French go home!” Well, well, well, isn’t France’s criticism of the U.S. Coalition presence in Iraq a bit like the pot calling the kettle black? Listen to the French government’s words, as reported by the BBC:

President Jacques Chirac ordered the "immediate destruction of Ivorian military aircraft used in recent days in violation of the ceasefire". …

French Defence Minister Michele Alliot-Marie said her country held Ivorian President Laurent Gbagbo "personally responsible" for public order in his country. …

Without giving details of the airport attack, the [French] defence ministry said the army had "responded in a situation of legitimate defence" and was seeking "the immediate end of combat".

Pretty strong words from a country that claims “France was against this [Iraq] war because this war was not necessary.” Is France’s presence in the Ivory Coast “necessary?” Are French “peacekeepers” in the Ivory Coast there strictly for humanitarian reasons, or do business interests play a part?

Mon ami, President Chirac, can you spell “Najaf,” “Sadr City,” or “Fallujah?” When U.S. sons and daughters get killed trying to bring democracy to Iraq, what should we do, sit on our hands? Your good buddy, Kofi Annan, is warning Americans not to clean up Fallujah just as you are cleaning up the Ivorian air force. Monsieur Chirac, vous êtes un hypocrite.

The U.S.’ reasons for going to war in Iraq were crystal clear. No WMD’s in Iraq? Some were found. The rest are probably in Syria, France’s traditional ally. Iraq weapons inspector David Kay found all sorts of evidence that Saddam was violating U.N. restrictions on WMD development. Kay's team found organic precursors for biological weapons. They found "suspected mobile biological agent laboratories." Kay's team found evidence that Saddam's goons were working on ballistic missile systems with ranges far in excess of the U.N.-mandated limits.

The French said they believed Saddam had WMDs before the war. The UN Security Council, including France, voted unanimously on 08/11/2002 to hold “Iraq in ‘material breach’ of its obligations under previous resolutions.” The same resolution “recall[ed] [a] repeated warning of ‘serious consequences’ for continued violations” by Iraq.

No links between Saddam and al-Qaeda? Au contraire, Monsieur Chirac; click here or here to see plenty of evidence of Iraq/al-Qaeda ties -- even related to 9/11.

Well, Monsieur Chirac, you can just pound salt up your butt. President Bush just garnered the largest popular vote in U.S. history. The President received a real majority, 51% or 59,291,983 votes. We’ll do what we have to do, and we won’t ask anybody about passing a “global test” before we do.

http://netwmd.com/articles/article774.html


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2; 5; 9; angry; back; bombed; bombers; capital; citizen; city; coalition; coast; criticism; destroying; everybody; evidence; fighter; france; french; frenchman; get; go; helicopters; hit; home; hypocrisy; hypocrite; iraq; ivorian; ivory; ivorycoast; justification; killed; looting; mobs; north; planes; position; presence; properties; rebel; reprisals; rioting; troops; us; war; yamoussoukro; yelling; your
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: StJacques
They are protecting the Muslim rebels in the north who have been trying to slaughter the southern Christians for years. Whenever the government starts to win, the French step in and protect the rebels. Respectfully, the southerners are right - the French should leave. (They would be happy to have Americans, but not French).
21 posted on 11/06/2004 6:34:24 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: forty_years
Is It Different When France Does It?

Yes. It smells worse, and is generally hairier.

22 posted on 11/06/2004 6:35:36 PM PST by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forty_years

But...but... Where's their permission slip?


23 posted on 11/07/2004 12:56:37 PM PST by Pirate21 (America has spoken!! Now, let's live up to the call.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson