Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tree chopping lands forest owner in jail
Aftenposten - Norway ^ | 12/14/2004 | Hans O.Torgersen

Posted on 12/17/2004 11:32:18 AM PST by Red Badger

The owner of a vast tract of virgin forest land in north-central Norway is in big trouble after chopping down trees on his own property. Newspaper Aftenposten reported Tuesday that the 54-year-old forest owner has been sentenced to six months in jail for chopping down the trees on his land in Flatanger, Nord-Trøndelag. The trees he chopped were in an area that was part of an officially designated nature preserve. An appeals court in Nord-Trøndelag ruled that the forest owner intentionally launched the logging operation, in the hopes that the area would thus lose its nature preserve status. Illegal logging He'd first been charged by Norway's white-collar crime unit (Økokrim) for logging in two areas of the nature preserve in 2001. He also chopped down trees in the area in 1995, when government officials already were discussing whether to regulate the area as a nature preserve. Prosecutors argued that the forest owner violated environmental restrictions aimed at protecting valuable virgin forests. 'Vandalism' The court agreed, claiming that the fallen trees were located in the nature preserve's most valuable area. They claimed the owner's logging operation was akin to vandalism. The forest owner defended his logging operation, saying county officials had led him to believe that the areas where he cut trees were exempt from the nature preserve regulations.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: aroomwithamoose; bittensister; bjornfree; bjorntobealive; environment; hugetractsofland; imalumberjackandimok; jail; moosealert; nopropertyrights; norway; oncebittentwiceshy; owner; pining4thefjords; propertyrights; stripes; treehugger; turntotheright; yaah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Red Badger

Norway = Zimbabway


21 posted on 12/17/2004 12:29:59 PM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

There's the wrong way, the right way, and then there's the Norway......


22 posted on 12/17/2004 12:32:10 PM PST by Red Badger (If the Red States are JESUSLAND, then the Blue States are SATANLAND......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The STANDARD LIBERAL ANSWER is:
We are preserving them for future generations.......

At which time you say, "In approximately 4 billion years the sun will become a Red Giant and will vaporize this planet and everything in it." .......


_____________

I can't wait to us that line, thank you! And at the end I will add "what are YOU doing to prevent THAT!?!"
23 posted on 12/17/2004 12:35:44 PM PST by WakeUpAndVote (Moore, DumbandWhite 9.11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The owner of a vast tract of virgin forest land in north-central Norway

Should be written as, "HUUUUUUUGE tracts of land"

24 posted on 12/17/2004 12:37:47 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote

Be prepared! When you use that line, the first reaction will be a "deer in the headlights" stare with an open mouth breather jaw.......Try not to laugh too much.....


25 posted on 12/17/2004 12:45:32 PM PST by Red Badger (If the Red States are JESUSLAND, then the Blue States are SATANLAND......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ..
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
26 posted on 12/17/2004 1:01:04 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulation. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

I bet he's now pining for the fjords.


Anyway, wi not trei a holiday in Norway this yer?

See the loveli lakes

The wonderful telephone system

And mani interesting furry animals

Including the majestik moose

A moose once bit my sister

No realli! She was karving her initials on the moose

with the sharpened end of an interspace toothbrush

given her by Svenge - her brother-in-law - an oslo dentist

and star of many Norwegian movies: "The Hot Hands of an Oslo Dentist",

"Fillings of Passion", "The Huge Molars of Horst Nordfink"...


27 posted on 12/17/2004 1:08:59 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Is the Quisling government back in power?


28 posted on 12/17/2004 1:11:15 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (I am poster #48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

Is the Quisling government back in power?

I didn't know they ever LEFT!......


29 posted on 12/17/2004 1:25:59 PM PST by Red Badger (If the Red States are JESUSLAND, then the Blue States are SATANLAND......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

BTTT!!!!!!!


30 posted on 12/17/2004 1:29:30 PM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Note the phrase "after chopping down trees on his own property." Obviously he does not "own" the property if he does not have exclusive control over its use, enjoyment and disposal. That exclusive relationship to the land is what constitues ownership. In this case, it appears that for all intents and purposes, the public or community owns the land for use as a nature preserve. This over-riding community interest appears to be common in socialistic countries.

In the USA, regulation is only supposed to prevent substantial injury to public health and safety from an individual's use of his own property. If it ends up creating a state of public ownership, that would be a 5th Amendment takings in the USA, justifying a claim for just compensation.

The way environmental regulation in the USA is going, it will not be long until we are on par with the Norweigan view of ownership, if we are not there already.


31 posted on 12/17/2004 3:34:54 PM PST by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
the 54-year-old forest owner has been sentenced to six months in jail for chopping down the trees on his land in Flatanger

I don't care if this guy is now a convict. Any 54 year old who can still swing an ax with authority has certainly earned my respect.

32 posted on 12/17/2004 3:46:03 PM PST by Freebird Forever (MERRY CHRISTMAS !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

Not just your eyes!


33 posted on 12/17/2004 4:10:14 PM PST by B4Ranch (((The lack of alcohol in my coffee forces me to see reality!)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
In the USA, regulation is only supposed to prevent substantial injury to public health and safety from an individual's use of his own property. If it ends up creating a state of public ownership, that would be a 5th Amendment takings in the USA, justifying a claim for just compensation.

Sounds like he suffered a regulatory taking, plus. Here, he'd just loose the value of his trees. Unless he lost ALL value, he'd be screwed. There's little respect for #5.
34 posted on 12/17/2004 4:27:47 PM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ah, Norge: average IQ 81, and falling.


35 posted on 12/18/2004 7:06:48 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

irrelevant eurononsense alert.


36 posted on 12/18/2004 7:10:58 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
The way environmental regulation in the USA is going, it will not be long until we are on par with the Norweigan view of ownership, if we are not there already.

I believe the Endangered Species Act has, in effect, taken away control from quite a few property owners.

37 posted on 12/18/2004 7:18:24 PM PST by mollynme (cogito, ergo freepum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson