Posted on 12/18/2004 9:49:53 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
I recall when I had to fly to WKRP land to repair issues on an aircraft which I soon found to be chartered by MM.
It was an impressive aircraft (a Gulfstream) and was my aircraft to return home in after repairs were made.
I did find it however to be uncomfortable to sit in the VIP seat for it sagged so much I felt like I was sitting on the floor!
German editor weibchen?
That one flew over my head.
The only German I know is: Ein volk! Ein reich! Seig heil!
It's my greeting to eco-fascists at public meetings.
Dog, female.
They could be a binary star system.......
Two giant balls of gas held together by gravity and orbiting each other.
.
Unfortunately for US...
...it's our own FFEEDOM...
...that's presently at stake...
...with an Enemy that's now...
...just around the corner and...
...up your street.
Soooo, again I ask....
.."IS it SAFE?" = HILLARY on Senate Armed Services Committee..
http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=629
.
"If she thinks that she can re-package herself as a conservative, she better think twice."
And if you think for a moment, that Republican presidential prospects can misunderestimate Hillary, think again.
Just as Bush used his political capital to BLOCK meaningful limitation on immigrant driver licenses, Hillary is moving to take the position left void.
If Bush favors illegal immigrants, over American citizens, Hillary may successfully claim that position.
And on, and on, issue by issue.
She will get "face time" on the media. Her likely opponents will be hard pressed to get noticed, for the next three years.
I am not saying she will win. She may not even get the nomination. But if she does get the nomination, she will be a strong candidate.
She will not be from Massachusettes, and she will not be a liberal (in perception).
These people usually get ONE shot. Dukakis, Mondale, Gore, Kerry were not very good.
Hillary will be better. She and Bill are smart at politics. Not the best, but good.
Bush is very good. Rove is excellent. But he may NOT be involved in 2008.
Right--Moore laid out the strategy bare here---to win they need to dupe poor, single moms. They need a populace who's poor, dumb, and dependent. That's been obvious for quite awhile.
Funny story kind of related-
Many, many moons ago a co-worker of mine tried to say Ronald Reagan was the worst thing that ever happened to his life--as if that were possible. I laughed, told him we control our own destiny and that as an outside observer it was clear to me the worst thing to ever happen to his life was his second ex-wife. He couldn't disagree...
Close, she found immigration. Her new thing now is border security and tighting the borders.
She's found her one conservative issue to use.
2008, when she has her "sister soulja" moment.
Moore may even go along with it.
I don't want to make you to optimistic, but you know that in the scholastic poll of High Schoolers, kids voted Bush over Kerry right?
In 4 years, all those kids were be allowed to vote.
This seems to place right into Moore's thinking that most of america is actually liberal, and its all about getting turnout.
Sidenote: The top 10 states with the largest increase in voting turnout for 2004 from 2000, all were red states. The bottom 10 states in increase (including 2 states that had decreases) in voting from 2000 to 2004, Kerry won 7 of them (including the 2 with decreases).
Well, McCain will certainly run, but he faces an uphill battle in the primaries (from the likes of REAL Republicans, like me.)
As far as questions, along with health questions, what about where the man's "center" might be? Why is he so prone to side against conservatives when that might get him some big ink? And, for me, why oh why did he turn his back on and vilify his comrades-in-arms - the Swifties?
Unfortunately, I see some disquieting similarities between McCain and (ugh) Kerry.
Despite what Moore thinks, I am confident that women will choose Rice over hamhocks Rodham-given that option.
They shocked me, but they were on tv for all to see.
She's not from MA but she is from NY. She is a liberal. Another liberal northeast senator will not fly. She's no babe from IL anymore, nor the "little missus" from Arkansas. She wanted to be a New Yorker, and by golly, she is one now. BTW, she doesn't even own property ownside the NY/DC circuit.
I know--there are alot of high schoolers who will vote in four years--and many are conservative and will vote against their parents. In spite of the fact that young people seem to have a low turnout rate, I suspect that conservative young people are more committed about voting (as well as any other responsibility) than are liberal kids.
McCain is also notorious for having an uneven temper, not a quality you would want in a Commander-in-Chief.
Well... shows what MM really knows. I know maybe one or two "liberal" females who will vote for her but all my other female friends will vote against her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.