Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientist: Asteroid May Hit Earth in 2029
Yahoo/AP ^ | 12/23/04 | JOHN ANTCZAK

Posted on 12/23/2004 8:24:16 PM PST by hole_n_one

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-337 next last
To: eno_

I see 1:60, but not the 1:43. Can you post the URL? Thanks.

Near-Earth Asteroid 2004 MN4 Reaches Highest Score To Date On Hazard Scale
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news146.html


121 posted on 12/26/2004 6:37:42 PM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: flying Elvis
Dooom. Dooom. Doom.

no gir. that's BAD.

122 posted on 12/26/2004 6:41:13 PM PST by Libertarian4Bush (http://www.homestarrunner.com/xmas04.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

one more try...

a selection of related topics:

Massive Tsunami Sweeps Atlantic Coast In Asteroid Impact Scenario
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/919723/posts

Hollywood fantasy? Tidal wave disaster is just waiting to happen
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1189804/posts

'Rogue waves' reported by mariners get scientific backing
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1176910/posts

Ship-sinking monster waves revealed by ESA satellites
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1176837/posts

Ship-sinking Monstor Waves Revealed By ESA Satellites
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1178061/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1178061/posts?page=8#8

Books, Magazines, Movies, Music
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1169550/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1169550/posts?page=50#50

Giant wave could threaten US
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1188396/posts

Tidal wave threat 'over-hyped'
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1263784/posts

Tidal Waves Kill More Than 700 in Asia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308542/posts

Tidal Waves Kill More Than 3,200 in Asia
(Update: Death toll now tops 11,500)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308556/posts

Asian Tsunamis Surge Against East African Coast
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1308649/posts


123 posted on 12/26/2004 6:41:41 PM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I see 1:60, but not the 1:43. Can you post the URL? Thanks.

The URL of the official JPL/NASA tracking data page for this asteroid is:

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2004mn4.html

Even if the final analysis does not move much, some of the supporting data is updated as observatories report in and it is added to the model. This page seems to be changing daily.

Right now, almost all the data is coming in from observatories south of the equator, as the asteroid is somewhere in the vicinity of the South Pole currently, making the participants a bit sparse. It will become visible in to observatories north of the equator in a little bit, which is also where a lot of the observatories that can track this thing actually are.

124 posted on 12/26/2004 6:55:48 PM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: tortoise

Oh, yeah... I had that one...

Looks like 1:45 right now, per their translator, or 2.222...%


125 posted on 12/26/2004 7:06:20 PM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
Given that it won't (in theory) hit the Earth until 25 years from now, how about developing an ion rocket and attaching it to the asteroid to slow it down enough so it can be parked in the gravitational zone between the Earth and the Moon? Given the generally very high quality of minerals you can get out of an asteroid, it might not be such a bad idea.

Yours is an interesting proposal. To show how interesting it can be, let's assume that an ion rocket will be attached to 2004 MN4 tomorrow.

Where will we attach it? The asteroid is undoubtedly rotating, creating a monumental problem in determining where the rocket should be attached in order to force the asteroid away from Earth.

Over the next 25 years the asteroid will travel about 14.5 billion miles. From that distance (imagine the asteroid's orbit is stretched out into a straight line 14.5 billion miles long) target Earth subtrahends an angle of about 0.1 arc seconds. Out of the uncountable possible scenarios, one is if the persons deciding where to place the ion rocket make an error of 0.1 arc seconds in directing the force of the rocket in the proper direction, they may cause the asteroid to hit Earth rather than miss it.

It might be less risky to attempt to blow the sucker up into lots of smaller, less threatening chunks, IMO.

126 posted on 12/26/2004 7:15:56 PM PST by ngc6656
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

At the top of the table on http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2004mn4.html, the most recent numbers are 2.2e-2, or about 1 in 43.


127 posted on 12/26/2004 7:23:48 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Updated: The link I posted earlier is showing a 2.7% impact probability, updated from 2.2%. Impact size revised slightly upward by JPL/NASA.


128 posted on 12/27/2004 1:19:03 AM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ngc6656

:') An alternative is to use the ion drive to speed up the rock at perihelion to alter its trajectory. Any rotation would be addressed first.


129 posted on 12/27/2004 11:39:40 AM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: eno_; tortoise

as I noted, the NASA figure given for 2.2e-02 is 1:45...

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ip?2.2e-02

Impact Probability: 2.2e-02

2.200000000% chance of Earth impact

or

1 in 45 chance

...and as tortoise noted, now there are some more observations, and the odds of impact have improved a little.

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ip?2.7e-02

Impact Probability: 2.7e-02

2.700000000% chance of Earth impact

or

1 in 37 chance

or

97.30000000% chance the asteroid will miss the Earth


130 posted on 12/27/2004 11:44:55 AM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I always thought Torinos were highly over-rated.....


131 posted on 12/27/2004 11:48:25 AM PST by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: tortoise

"Number of Potential Impacts 41" up from 39 I think it was, and now five of the calculated close approaches are 1 on the Torino scale. This is fascinating.


132 posted on 12/27/2004 11:48:37 AM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I just heard that Spacewatch has found some images containing the rock from March 2004, several months earlier than the official discovery. This will greatly extend the baseline, making a much more accurate prediction possible than what they have to work with now.


133 posted on 12/27/2004 11:48:45 AM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan; Squantos; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; Poohbah; rightwing2; sauropod

I start getting social security in 2016. That is fine with me.


134 posted on 12/27/2004 11:53:58 AM PST by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Nabber

:')


135 posted on 12/27/2004 11:59:29 AM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SLB

If ya plan for everything "they" or mother nature will just do something else........work, live, and play like today is the last day everyday SLB !.........but carry that 1911A1 for the smaller bumps on lifes road......:o)


136 posted on 12/27/2004 12:12:46 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: blam

off the subject, I'm pretty sure you are going to love the "mummies" video. I've been watching it for quite a while; it's detailed, it's beautifully shot in various quiet corners of Asia and in labs and such, and Malk's narration enhances the entire thing. Back to topic. Related topics:

Moon's Youngest Crater Discovered
BBC ^ | 12-20-2002
Posted on 12/19/2002 7:42:01 PM PST by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/809572/posts

NASA Solves Moon Mystery (+Geology Picture of the Week, February 16-22, 2003)
February 20, 2003 | Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Posted on 02/21/2003 1:47:27 PM PST by cogitator
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/848926/posts

New crater revives Moon mystery
11 January 2003
New Scientist
Jeff Hecht
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3242

"A mysterious flash on the Moon caught on camera 50 years ago is still provoking disagreements about its origin. Astronomer Bonnie Buratti says her new results show that the flash was caused by a 20-metre asteroid hitting the Moon... In a future issue of the journal Icarus, Buratti reports a fresh impact scar at the site of the 1953 flash on images collected by the Clementine spacecraft as it orbited the Moon in 1994. A bright blanket of ejected material covers an area that is about 1.5 kilometres across, and the colour of the debris indicates that the crater is relatively new."


137 posted on 12/27/2004 1:04:26 PM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doom n gloom
"Yikes! Better go tidy up the Y2K shelter and jot a couple crates of Spam™ on the grocery list.."

Squashed by an asteroid....vs.....stuck in a shelter with SPAM to eat. I'll take my chances with the asteroid.

138 posted on 12/27/2004 1:06:47 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tortoise

Great! Now we'll get the good news a little faster. :')


139 posted on 12/27/2004 1:07:19 PM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

Scirus search
the search results in the abstract for "Giordano Bruno, the June 1975 Meteoroid Storm, Encke, and Other Taurid Complex Objects", Jack B. Hartung.
140 posted on 12/27/2004 1:36:09 PM PST by SunkenCiv (There's nothing new under the Sun. That accounts for the many quotes used as taglines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson