Posted on 12/24/2004 7:00:22 AM PST by Chi-townChief
One reads in the papers that the Pentagon expects the war in Iraq to continue till 2010. Donald Rumsfeld will not guarantee that it will be over by 2009. How many dead and maimed Americans by then? How many sad obituaries? How many full pages in the papers with pictures of all the casualties?
Why?
The reasons change: weapons of mass destruction, war on terror, freedom and democracy for the people of Iraq, American credibility. All are deceptions. This cockamamie and criminally immoral war was planned before the Sept. 11 attack in which Iraq was not involved. It has nothing to do with the war on terror. American-style freedom and democracy in Arab countries are hallucinations by men and women like Paul Wolfowitz and Condi Rice whose contribution to the war is writing long memos -- Republican intellectuals with pointy heads.
One must support the troops, I am told. I certainly support the troops the best way possible: Bring them home, get them out of a war for which the planning was inadequate, the training nonexistent, the goal obscure, and the equipment and especially the armor for their vehicles inferior. They are brave men and women who believe they are fighting to defend their country and have become sitting ducks for fanatics. Those who die are the victims of the big lie. They believe that they are fighting to prevent another terror attack on the United States. They are not the war criminals. The ''Vulcans,'' as the Bush foreign policy team calls itself, are the criminals, and they ought to face indictment as war criminals.
There is an irony in the promise of a prolonged war. The Vulcans believed that, as the world's only superpower, the military might of the United States was overwhelming, irresistible, beyond challenge. In fact, the war into which they tricked us has become a quagmire, 130,000 American troops are at the mercy of perhaps 5,000 true-believer guerrillas and an Iraqi population that doesn't like Americans any more than it liked Saddam Hussein. It is a war in which there is no possibility of victory -- whether it ends in June 2005 or June 2010, whether there are 2,000 American battle deaths or 50,000, whether there are 10,000 wounded Americans or 500,000, whether those with post-traumatic stress are 10 percent of the returning troops or 30 percent.
One of the criteria for a just war is that there be a reasonable chance of victory. Where is that reasonable chance? Each extra day of the war makes it more unjust, more criminal. The guilty people are not only the Vulcans but those Americans who in the November election endorsed the war.
They are also responsible for the Iraqi deaths, especially the men who join the police or the army because they need the money to support their families -- their jobs eaten up in the maw of the American ''liberation.'' Iraqi deaths don't trouble many Americans. Their attitude is not unlike the e-mail writer who said he rejoices every time a Muslim kills another Muslim. ''Let Allah sort them out.''
This time of the year we celebrate ''peace on Earth to men of good will.'' Americans must face the fact that they can no longer claim to be men and women of good will, not as long as they support an unnecessary, foolish, ill-conceived, badly executed and, finally, unwinnable war. If most people in other countries blame the war on Americans, we earned that blame in the November election -- not that there is any serious reason to believe that Sen. John Kerry would have had the courage to end the war. Perhaps if he had changed his mind, as he did about the war in Vietnam, and opposed the Iraqi war, he might have won. Too late now. Too late till 2010 -- or 2020.
Note: Some conservative Catholics -- Republicans, I assume -- are spreading the word on the Internet that I am an ''unfrocked'' (sic) priest. That is false witness. I am and have been for 50 years a priest in good standing of the Archdiocese of Chicago. Call (312) 751-8220 if you don't believe me. False witness is a grave sin and must be confessed before Christmas communion. Moreover, those who commit it are bound to restore the reputation of the one about whom they've lied.
This (in)famous published author has gone moonbat.
Is Andrew Greeley a Catholic Priest or Muslim Mullah? This article is similar to the talking points uttered in the Mideast media.
He's more like a mullah if that last paragraph is any indication.
Father, what penance would you impose for saying "dreary old windbag"?
"Moreover, those who commit it are bound to restore the reputation of the one about whom they've lied."
You first Greeley.
Although I don't think you have enough time to finish before Christmas communion...you hypocrite.
I think he should be more concerned about the cleaning up of the house that he lives in before concerning himself with the house alongside his.
He needs to spend 40 days and 40 nights in the desert.
"False witness is a grave sin and must be confessed before Christmas communion."
So is encouraging Catholics to vote for abortionist.
Father do you really believe that God will judge you only on the things YOU want HIM to consider? Do you think God is a liberal democrat?
I guess the victims of Saddam Hussein are worthless subhumans in Fr. Greeley's eyes.
NOTE TO MEDIA: THEY’RE NOT INSURGENTS – THEY’RE TERRORIST COCKROACHES!
Greeley is extra-grouchy this year.
Andrew Greely=Jane Fonda in a Cassock
Again with the SAME LINE...Don't bother reading the article...it's a rehash of old propaganda...
Our troops will not appreciate having to fight radical Islam within our own borders with far more restrictive ROEs. Not to mention that fighting them here will be completely useless since they will continue to train, outfit and deploy outside our borders.
I got your false witness hanging right there, Padre.
I guess it never occurred to this guy that those Iraqis might just want help Americans to purge the terrorists from their country? Nah, just like our soldiers, Greeley is sure they joined for the paycheck. He has no concept of the words "duty" or "honor".
I don't often agree with Fr. Greeley, but here, he got it right. At least three of his five adjectives modifying "war" are spot on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.