Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Literally earth-shaking, Tsunami quake shifted the North Pole, moved Newark, NJ, 1/2 inch
The Newark Star Ledger ^ | 12.31.04

Posted on 01/01/2005 9:38:48 PM PST by Coleus

Beyond killing tens of thousands and unleashing a humanitarian crisis of epic proportions, the twinned earthquake and tsunami that struck Southeast Asia Sunday altered the angle of the Earth on its axis, moved the North Pole, pushed walls of water throughout all the world's oceans and shifted the soil as far away as Newark, researchers are reporting.

Scientists said yesterday they are looking beyond the tragedy to try to extract meaning from an event of such magnitude. They want to learn how the Earth responds as a system to one of Nature's terrible jolts. And they wonder about the Earth's resilience.

Calculations performed by Richard Gross of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California show that the quake sped up the rotation of the Earth and enlarged its wobble, causing the length of a day to shrink permanently by 3 millionths of a second. It also moved the North Pole 1 inch, he found.

Researchers at the Lamont-Doherty facility in New York, part of Columbia University, have been tracking earthquakes for decades and say their instruments showed that the quake rang the Earth like a bell. Seismic waves emanated from the epicenter, like ripples moving out from a pebble thrown onto a pond surface.

Armbruster, the Lamont-Doherty seismologist, said that, though he hasn't completed his analysis, he believes the quake moved the soil in the Newark and greater metropolitan area by a half- inch. The temblor on the other side of the world pushed the ground up that far, then back down the same distance. The movement was so swift, it was not noticed by residents of the region, he said.

A well-studied 1964 quake in Alaska of a greater magnitude moved the ground in New York up 2 inches and then down 2 inches, he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical; US: Connecticut; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Georgia; US: Maine; US: Maryland; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: North Carolina; US: Rhode Island; US: South Carolina; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: arctic; earthquake; geology; sumatraquake; tsunami
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-183 next last
To: Rightone

the parameters of hillary's butt were unchanged


61 posted on 01/02/2005 12:07:40 AM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
moved Newark, NJ, 1/2 inch

Prompting Jim McGreevy to ask his Sex Toy du Jour, "Was it good for you?"

Now that's funny, I don't care WHO you are...that right there is funny!

62 posted on 01/02/2005 12:16:59 AM PST by andie74 (Proud Resident of Fly-Over Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq; Coleus
Unfortunately with something that has apparently changed the Earth is such a way, you have to think that eventually everything will to back to the way it was.

No. This is a pretty small change in a constantly changing Earth.

63 posted on 01/02/2005 12:31:24 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Actually the days are getting longer due to the Earth/Moon system anyway. This is a pretty small variation.


64 posted on 01/02/2005 12:32:50 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
I wonder what these changes do or do not do to oil production around the world.

Not a thing IMHO.

65 posted on 01/02/2005 12:33:38 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

I live close to Newark I hope it move a half inch further away .


66 posted on 01/02/2005 12:34:10 AM PST by hineybona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
This is a joke, right?

Nope.

67 posted on 01/02/2005 12:34:31 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
A 3ms change in the earth's spin rate will likely play h*ll with all manner of satellite tracking and timing, including GPS, I would imagine. I can only imagine all the software changes and adjustments that will have to be made for all of the satellites the world uses.

Not at all. The Earth's rotation is changing constantly anyway.

68 posted on 01/02/2005 12:35:39 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ethyl; isthisnickcool
I wonder what it will do to the GPS, those pre-quake, do those need to be updated, or will the satelites change it for us? I have software in my GPS around the world, was the change miniscule enough not to matter, or do I need updated software?

Nope. You do not need to change software. In fact GPS time is drifing away from UTC time. It is currently 13 seconds off.

69 posted on 01/02/2005 12:37:21 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice; rintense
Just point into your mind a what-if situation. What if...four massive earthquakes occured within 24 hours and the tilt of the earth went south 2 degrees?

That would not happen. Think of the Earth as a giant gyroscope.

Note: Actually, the tilt of the Earth is oscillating back and forth slightly.

70 posted on 01/02/2005 12:41:18 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"...It also moved the North Pole 1 inch, he found."

That little tidbit has to be taken with a grain of salt.

During the IGY (International Geophysical Year), it was determined by very accurate accelerometer measurements that the South Pole isn't statationary, but, rather, moves in a quasi-circular spiral describing a circular envelope of about 40 foot radius.

So it is sort of ridiculous to now say the the North Pole (which should be very similar to the South Pole) has "moved" one inch, as though it's a stationary bearing of a wheel.

It may have moved one inch from where it was last week, but it will move a lot more than that just with it's normal wanderings.

71 posted on 01/02/2005 12:45:47 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
causing the length of a day to shrink permanently by 3 millionths of a second.

Looks like I'm gonna be late for work Monday.

72 posted on 01/02/2005 12:57:43 AM PST by fat city (Julius Rosenberg's soviet code name was "Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue; VeritatisSplendor
It is not friction. The moon pulls a bulge in the ocean. Because the earth rotates faster than the moon orbits the earth, this bulge is ahead of the moon. This bulge pulls the moon to go faster and the moon pulls on the bulge, slowing the earth.

Not quite. It is called "friction" due to friction of the ocean tides on the Earth. These cause the Earth to slow down and thusly, the Moon to recede.

Basically, any object inside geosynchronous orbit will slow down itself and speed up the earth. Outside and the object will gain energy and slow down the earth. One of the 2 Martian moons is inside geosync orbit and will crash into mars. Our moon is outside geosync orbit and eventually will drift away.

Not quite. A decaying orbit will cause a satellite to speed up, however, that is a function of Kepler's three laws. A satellites decay is mostly caused by solar wind or atmospheric drag.

What you are thinking of is called the Roche limit. This is the limit where a satellite (moon) can be torn apart from the tidal forces of the parent body it is orbiting. This is not necessarily at geosynchronous. You are correct that Phobos, one of the Martian moons is inside the Roche limit.

73 posted on 01/02/2005 1:01:49 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"Can a Tsunami hit New Jersey?"

Yes. Especially a seismic sea wave cause by an underwater landslide on the continental shelf.

"Can the Continental Shelf stop it?"

No. It can start it.

"And what kind of provisions, alert system and emergency plan does the NJ State Police, National Guard, Port Authority, municipal and county Police and US Coast Guard have planned."

I don't know. I am in California and am familiar only with the disaster planning with regard to this state.

A tsunami-like wave, set up by a nearby underwater landslide can occur quite suddenly. On August 31, 1930, a small (M=5.2) earthquake in the Santa Monica area, likely triggered a landslide in the Santa Monica Bay a short time later. An unusually large set a waves (2-4 meters larger than normal) inundated the nearby beaches, without warning, killing at least a couple of people and causing many others to need to be rescued.

A similar mechanism could cause the same result on any coastline.

74 posted on 01/02/2005 1:08:32 AM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ethyl
How and Why were they anounced before the quake?? Or were there enough other quakes to make a difference? So what you are telling me, is, I need new software for my gps to work corectly?

Your GPS is fine. The north pole is constantly moving. The magnetic declination corrections are also constantly changing. Delorme decided it was time to issue an update. I received an e-mail notification because I'm a registered, paying customer. The updates were in progress for months before the quake.

If your GPS has a base map that show magnetic lines of declination for a given point, then you might want to track down a firmware update. Garmin MapSource products will probably be appropriately updated soon as well.

75 posted on 01/02/2005 1:11:41 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

They were saying on Art Bell that it also changed the earth
s rotation by 1 millionth of a second faster. I wonder what the affects of that will be? Probably not enough to change much, but it made our days and nights shorter by that much.


76 posted on 01/02/2005 1:13:29 AM PST by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; Rightone; MikeinIraq; GSlob; BerniesFriend; FreedomCalls; nhoward14; ForGod'sSake; HHFi; ...
Here is a post from a different thread. I think it may be helpful here as well:

Note the sentence with the underlined word (last paragraph):

There will not be a leap second again this year.

“Why” I hear you cry!

First let us start out with a brief explanation of the need for the precursor information I am providing prior to actually getting to leap seconds.

Historically timekeeping and calendars have been tied to the motions found in the heavens. These have been primarily the stars, our Moon, and the Sun. To get a rudimentary understanding of how time is measured and where we got our units of time, we must first talk about the motions of these heavenly bodies referenced back to our Earth. The background for this post will start with the Celestial Sphere, followed with a description of the Earth Sun relationship, and finally with the Earth Moon relationships/system.

The Celestial sphere:

When we look up at the stars in the night sky they appear to be stationary relative to each other. As the Earth moves from one side of the Sun to the other, the displacement of those stars due to parallax is less than one second of arc even for the nearest star (Proxima Centauri). One way of looking at this is a fixed sphere of stars surrounding the Earth/Sun system. This is often referred to as the Celestial Sphere. This is why some of the ancient civilizations considered the stars to be holes in a tapestry.

Since we are talking distances and parallax, lets briefly take a moment and describe such. The more familiar term for the layman when referring to stellar distances is called a light year. This is the distance light will travel in one calendar year. For example the star Proxima Centauri is approximately 4.22 light years from our solar system. Astronomers use another term that may be not so familiar called the Parsec. The Parsec (parallax-arcsecond) is the distance needed for an object (star) to have a shift of one arcsecond referenced to one astronomical second (AU), the average distance from the Earth to the Sun or approximately 93 million miles. An arcsecond is 1/60 of an arcminute, which is 1/60 of a degree. However, there are no stars that are close enough to exhibit this large a shift. The distance of a Parsec is about 3.26 light years and the nearest star is 4.22 light years.

Even though it appears the stars remain in “fixed” locations in the night sky, over a period of time the stars do move relative to each other and relative to the Earth. This is why the right ascension and declination (star location) changes over the years. If you look at a star catalogue based on the epoch B1950 and one base on the epoch J2000, you will notice some differences.

Another interesting item of note is that the constellations we see are made up of the brightest stars. Even in the same constellation these stars are at different distances from the Earth. Some may be dimmer than the others, however, being closer they are just as bright as a larger one further away. The brightness of a star is called its magnitude. There are two ways astronomers measure magnitude: Apparent Magnitude and Absolute Magnitude.

The Apparent Magnitude is how bright a star appears to us here on the Earth. The Absolute Magnitude is how bright a star would appear if it were exactly ten parsecs away from the Earth. (Close to 33 light years).

Two notes:

1) Apparent magnitude is usually denoted with a small “m” and absolute magnitude uses a capital “M”.

2) The magnitude scale is backwards of what you might think, the larger the number the fainter the object.

Since the Earth is tilted (23.5 degrees) in reference to the path it sweeps out in its orbit about the Sun, this path projected onto the celestial sphere does not fall on the celestial equator. This imaginary plane is called the ecliptic. Note: This angle between the ecliptic and the equatorial plane is called The Obliquity of The Ecliptic.

This imaginary plane crosses the celestial equator in two places (called the equinoxes). The Vernal Equinox falls in the spring as the Sun appears to cross the ecliptic going north and the Autumnal Equinox falls in autumn when the Sun again crosses the ecliptic, this time going south. Note: Vernal comes from the Latin vernalis, meaning spring. Also the term equinox relates to the word equal since both day and night are close to the same, 12 hours during the equinox.

The points where this plane is the farthest above (north) and below (south) the celestial equator is called the solstices. In the northern hemisphere of the earth, the most northern point of the ecliptic is called the Summer Solstice and the southern most is called the Winter Solstice. In the Southern hemisphere of the Earth the reverse is true.

The zodiac lies along the plane of the ecliptic. Since the Earth is orbiting the Sun, the Sun appears to follow the plane of the ecliptic, making one complete circle in one calendar year. The name “zodiac” comes from the Greek meaning animal circle. Note: The path of the Moon and the other planets fall pretty much on this plane as well. Since it takes 365 days for the Earth to orbit the Sun and there are 360 degrees in a circle, the Sun moves pretty close to 1 degree per day.

If you were to draw a line out from the Earth intersecting the Vernal Equinox, that line would be referred to as The First Point of Aries. The reason it was called this is that this line pointed to the first star in the constellation of Ares in March of 1950.

The celestial sphere is tied to the Earth for its coordinate system. Project the Earth’s equator out to infinity and you have the equator of the celestial sphere. Likewise the north and south poles of the Earth points to the north and south poles of the celestial sphere respectively. This makes it very easy to map the sky referenced to the Earth. This coordinate system is called the Equatorial Coordinate System. It ties in closely with our own geographic coordinate system here on the surface of the Earth.

There is one fundamental difference however. The geographic coordinate system is fixed upon the surface of the Earth (Lat Long) so it rotates with the rotation of the Earth. The celestial coordinate system is fixed to the celestial sphere and appears to rotate due to the Earth’s rotation. The “latitude” of the celestial sphere (the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator) is called declination with zero being on the equator. This is pretty easy since the celestial’s equator and poles appear to be fixed like our own earth. Unlike the Earth, since the celestial sphere appears to be rotating, the “longitude”, called right ascension, is not a “fixed” reference to the Earth. So instead of using degrees, hours were used for this measurement. First there needed to be a “fixed” direction to measure from. The Vernal Equinox was selected as the zero reference for the right ascension. Since there are 360 degrees in a circle, the Earth rotates about 15 degrees every hour. So you will note right ascension is measured in hours/minutes/seconds as apposed to degrees.

Remember that for declination Zero is on the equator and for right ascension zero is at the Vernal Equinox. So the Vernal Equinox will have the coordinates of 0 degrees and 0 hours. This then becomes the center point for an Equatorial Sky Chart.

On to the Earth-Sun system:

It takes one year for the Earth to rotate around the Sun one time and 24 hours to rotate on its axis. Think about this relationship. Not only is the Earth revolving on its axis, it is in motion about the Sun. (I know this is really basic grade school stuff, however, it will help in visualizing the concepts I am about to explain) Therefore the Earth moves 1/365th of its orbit about the Sun every day.

Ok, here is where that visualization will come in handy. Since a “day” is described by one complete rotation of the Earth on its axis, this equates from noon to noon (when a point on the Earth is directly pointed at the Sun). The term for this is called the Mean Solar Day. But here is the rub; the Earth has moved during this period of time we called a day. So the Earth must turn a tiny bit more to have the same spot facing the Sun every day.

Now let us think of this celestial sphere we have been chatting about. Remember the stars appear fixed in one location (at least on a daily basis). This means that one complete revolution of the Earth referenced to a star does not take that little bit of extra time to be over the same spot on the Earth. This “day” is referred to as a Sidereal Day. It takes approximately four extra minutes for the Earth to have the Sun over the same location on the Earth than a star.

This is the difference between a Sidereal Day and a Mean Solar Day.

Also the Earth is tilted on its axis from the plane of the ecliptic by 23.5 degrees. That tilt causes the North Pole to be currently pointed towards Polaris. As the Earth moves around the sun its pole stays pointed at Polaris. This is the cause of the seasons we experience. Note. This tilt varies back and forth from 21.6 degrees to 24.5 degrees approximately every 41,000 years.

There is also a precession of our pole and it sweeps a complete circle in the sky (think of the Earth as a top wobbling as it rotates) about every 26,000 years. (Hard to explain without a diagram). This gives us different pole stars as the north pole of the Earth sweeps out a circle on the celestial sphere.

There are also a number of other motions that must be taken into consideration over the years such as the precession of the aphelion. Our Earth’s orbit around the Sun is not a perfect circle. It is an ellipse with the closest point of the orbit called the perihelion and the furthest point the aphelion. Currently the aphelion falls on the fourth of July. However, this is not always the case. The aphelion and perihelion change over the centuries and sweeps thru the calendar year with a periodicity of around 22,000 years. The amount of “squishing” (now that’s a scientific term :-)) of an ellipse is called its eccentricity. If the eccentricity is equal to zero the orbit will be a perfect circle. Between zero and one the path of an orbit is an ellipse. Note: A circle is also known as a degenerate ellipse. However, should the eccentricity equal exactly one, the path becomes a parabola and finally, if the eccentricity is greater than one, the path then becomes a hyperbola.

The Earth’s eccentricity is very small. However, even this changes over time. Its eccentricity varies periodically about every 100,000 years. There are also other motions caused by the Moon, Jupiter and the Sun called Nutations. One of the major nutations has a period of 18.6 years. Now that we have taken a cursory look at the Earth/Sun system, there is another big factor in all of this. It is called the Moon.

The reason the Moon keeps one face to the Earth (Its rotation on its axis matches the period of its orbit) is it is tidally locked to the Earth. This tidal locking will eventually cause the Earth and Moon to keep one face to each other.

Here is a more in depth explanation. The total angular momentum of the earth moon system, which is spin angular momentum plus the orbital angular momentum, is constant. (The Sun plays apart also) Friction of the oceans caused by the tides is causing the Earth to slow down a tiny bit each year. This is approximately two milliseconds per century causing the moon to recede by about 4 centimeters per year. As the Earth slows down, the Moon must recede to keep the total angular momentum a constant. In other words as the spin angular momentum of the earth decreases, the lunar orbital angular momentum must increase. Here is an interesting side note. The velocity of the moon will slow down as the orbit increases.

Another example of tidal locking is the orbit period and rotation of the planet Mercury. What is interesting about this one is that instead of a 1:1 synchronization where Mercury would keep one face to the Sun at all times, it is actually in a 2/3:1 synchronization. This is due to the High eccentricity of its orbit.

There also can be more than one body “locked” to each other. Lets take a look at the moon Io. Io is very nearly the same size as the Earth’s moon. It is approximately 1.04 times the size of the moon. There is a resonance between Io, Ganymede, and Europa. Io completes four revolutions for every one of Ganymede and two of Europa. This is due to a Laplace Resonance phenomenon. A Laplace Resonance is when more than two bodies are forced into a minimum energy configuration.

And finally a look at the asteroid belt:

The asteroid belt has an estimated total combined mass of less than 1 tenth of the Earth’s moon. Jupiter also has a profound effect on the asteroid belt. Since Jupiter has a semimajor axis of 5.2 AU (I AU is the distance from the Sun to the Earth) it has an orbital period of 11.86 years. Since the asteroids are not all at the same distance from the sun, some of them have an orbital period of one half of Jupiter. This puts that asteroid in a 2:1 orbital resonance with Jupiter. The result of this resonance is gaps called Kirkwood’s gaps. So here is the rub; why did not these asteroids for a planet? The reason is the gravitational force of Jupiter. It perturbs the asteroids giving them random velocities relative to each other. Another effect of both Jupiter and the Sun on the asteroid belt is a group of asteroids that both precede and follow Jupiter in its orbit by 60 degrees. These asteroids are known as the Trojans.

Since we are now talking about orbiting bodies, let us digress just a wee bit further and briefly talk about orbits:

There are different sizes and shapes of orbits. We use the term Semi-Major Axis to measure the size of an orbit. It is the distance from the geometric center of the ellipse to either the apogee or perigee (The highest (apo) and the lowest (peri)). Apoapsis is a general term for the greatest radial distance of an Ellipse as measured from a Focus. Apoapsis for an orbit around the Earth is called apogee, and apoapsis for an orbit around the Sun is called aphelion.

Periapsis is a general term for the smallest radial distance of an Ellipse as measured from a Focus. Periapsis for an orbit around the Earth is called perigee, and periapsis for an orbit around the Sun is called perihelion.

The terms Gee and Helios comes from the Greek words “Ge” (earth) and “Helios” (Sun) respectively.

First lets talk a bit about “where it is”. An orbit is a nothing more than an object falling around another object. Both Kepler and Newton came up with a set of laws that describe this phenomenon.

Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion:

1) The orbit of a planet is an ellipse with the sun at one of the foci.
2) The line drawn between a planet and the sun sweep out equal areas in equal times.
3) The square of the periods of the planets is proportional to the cubes of their mean distance from the sun.

So what is that telling us? In a nutshell, all orbits are ellipses, the close to the body you are orbiting the faster you go (e.g. if you have a highly elliptical orbit the satellite or planet’s velocity will increase as it approaches the object being orbited and decrease as it get further away).

These laws not only apply to planets and satellites, but to any orbiting body.

Note: Super geek alert #1:

For an orbiting body this is not entirely correct. It turns out that both bodies end up orbiting a common center of mass of the two-body system. However, for satellites, the mass of the Earth is so much greater than the mass of the satellite, the effective center of mass is the center of the Earth.

Newton’s three laws (and law of gravitation):

1) The first law states that every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled to change its state by the action of an external force. (Commonly known as inertia)
2) The second law states that force is equal to the change in momentum (MV) per change in time. (For a constant mass, force equals mass times acceleration F=ma)
3) The third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, if an object exerts a force on another object, a resulting equal force is exerted back on the original object.

Newton’s law of gravitation states that any two bodies attract one another with a force proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Note: Super geek alert #2:

Actual observed positions did not quite match the predictions under classical Newtonian physics. Albert Einstein later solved this discrepancy with his “General Theory of Relativity”. There are four classical “tests” that cemented General Relativity:

1. In November of 1919, using a solar eclipse, experimental verification of his theory was performed by measuring the apparent change in a stars position due to the bending of the light buy the sun’s gravity.
2. The changing orientation of the major axis or Mercury not exactly matching classical mechanics.
3. Gravitational Redshift
4. Gravitational Time Dilation

So what is all this trying to tell us? Planets, satellites, etc orbit their parents in predictable trajectories allowing us to “know” where they will be at any given time. A set of coordinates showing the location of these objects over a period of time is called its ephemeris.

FINALLY lets get to time and leap seconds!

Historically, time has been measured by the rotation of the Earth on its axis and the time it takes to rotate once about the Sun (a year). However, both of these are not uniform enough for precise calculations.

One of the units of time is called the second. It used to be defined as 1/86,400 of a Mean Solar Day. This was good enough for early calculations, but don’t forget that the Earth is slowing down due to tidal forces so that ends up changing over time. After a number of intermediate steps the second was finally redefined as:

The duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom. (Atomic time), also known as Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).

Since the Earth is slowing down approximately 1.4 milliseconds per day per century, this deceleration causes the Earth’s rotational time to vary from atomic time. The current true (instantaneous) rotation rate of the Earth is called UT1 (which is a non-uniform rotation). Over a period of a year the difference between it and UTC can approach a full second. However, since the Earth’s rotation is non-uniform, it is monitored continuously. If the difference between UT1 and UTC approaches 0.9 seconds, a leap second is added or subtracted from UTC to keep it uniform with the Earth’s rotation. So far all of the leap seconds have been positive. This tallies with the slowing of the Earth from tidal braking.

Note: Since the GPS time does not have leap seconds added or subtracted, it is diverging with UTC with every second added to UTC. Currently it is different by 13 seconds. This can cause some consternation when flying a satellite or spacecraft that uses GPS. If your ephemeris is calculated in GPS time and you receive a “vector” in UTC time, it will be off by 13 seconds. You just cannot add 13 or subtract 13 seconds and press on. The rub is that not only has the satellite moved 13 seconds in-track, the Earth has rotated underneath by 13 seconds (cross-track) as well. This is especially noticeable for the high inclination orbits. Vectors have to be recalculated when translating between GPS and UTC.

The interesting note is that the last time a leap second was needed was clear back in 1999. Remember, the deceleration of the Earth is not uniform. There may be a number of factors that cause this non-linearity such as snow and ice loads, earthquakes and others we haven’t even thought of. This could account for this long delay between leap seconds. This certainly is not a permanent condition. The Earth will continue to slow down and the deceleration will still vary. One final item: There is an ongoing debate whether to do away with leap seconds all together and just go with UTC. The problem with this is, over an extended period of time, the hours will no longer be tied to the solar day and noon may well end up in the evening. Another suggestion is to redefine the period of one second to more closely match the current rotation of the Earth. This too has its problems as the second will required “redefining” periodically as the Earth continues to slow down.

77 posted on 01/02/2005 1:20:29 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhoward14

This is complete garbage. The earth grows, not shrinks. I wonder if these chicken little geeks have bothered to calculate just how much longer the day has gotten due to the earths expansion, and the gradual slowing down of the earths rotation over that last two centuries alone. As most people with more than 2 brain cells know, the earth collects space dust, iron etc.
The earths rotation has been gradually slowing as each century passes by. The earths orbit around the sun has also been slowing with each passing century. The continental plates have been moving apart on one side and together on the other side. This is what causes earth quakes in the first place.
This is all basic grade 5 geography. What the heck has the Newark ledger editor been smoking, allowing garbage like this to go into print.

What's scary, is half of the American population will believe this garbage, guess which half? The loony left of course!
It's also a reflection of how poor of a job our education system is doing. They obviously can't even teach basic elementary school geography anymore. Why Billy has 2 Moms, and why Little Jane has 2 dad's is much more important.


78 posted on 01/02/2005 1:34:35 AM PST by Nuzcruizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
"...It also moved the North Pole 1 inch, he found."

The Norh pole's exact centre shift's constantly. This is also old news. The earthquake did not effect that either. In fact, the earth quake did not effect anything this article suggests, except peoples lives in the region.

It is what another person posted. a tiny grain of sand on a giant sized beach ball. The earth is costantly growing, the continents are constantly shifting, the earths rotation is constantly slowing. The earths orbit around the sun is constantly slowing, the whole solar system is gradualy expanding, and the sun constantly expanding. Man's activities on this planet are changing NONE of these things. Global warming is a myth, a scare tactic put into use in order to collect more money from the sheeple.

79 posted on 01/02/2005 1:50:05 AM PST by Nuzcruizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: timestax

It means Al Gore is going to step in at any moment and claim he invented some of this.


80 posted on 01/02/2005 2:09:31 AM PST by Military family member (Go Colts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson