Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(WA) Secretary of State improperly certified election
Evergreen Freedom Foundation ^ | 1-13-05 | Bob Williams

Posted on 01/13/2005 2:26:31 PM PST by truth49

By law, the Secretary of State (SOS) can only certify the results of a statewide election when that office receives a certified copy from each county of its abstract of votes containing specific information and an attached county seal for verification. Based on information provided by SOS in response to a public records request filed by the Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF), 24 of our 39 counties failed to provide all the required information for certification. Twenty-one didn't attach the county seal verifying accuracy of certification and three counties didn't even provide a sworn affidavit. Nonetheless, the Secretary of State certified the results of the manual recount.

Consider the following Secretary of State Washington Administrative Code (WAC) requirements (bolding is ours):

WAC 434-262-070: "Upon completion of the verification of the auditor's abstract of votes and the documentation of any corrective action taken, the county canvassing board shall sign a certification that the abstract is a full, true, and correct representation of the votes cast for the issues and offices listed thereon. The certification shall also state the total number of registered voters and votes cast in the county. The certification shall contain the oath required by RCW 29A.60.200, signed by the county auditor and attested to by the chairman of the board of the county legislative authority, and shall have a space where the official seal of the county shall be attached...."

WAC 434-262-080: "No later than the next business day following the certification . . . the county auditor shall send a certified copy of that part of the auditor's abstract of votes covering those issues and offices to the secretary of state. This copy must . . . have a certificate identical to that accompanying the official county canvass report, bearing the county seal and original signatures of the officers required to sign that document attached or affixed thereto. A copy of the written narrative documenting errors and discrepancies discovered and corrective action taken shall accompany the abstract if applicable...."

WAC 434-262-090: "... No county's certified copy of the abstract of votes shall be considered as complete for acceptance by the secretary of state until all of the material required by statute and regulation has been received by the secretary of state...."

WAC 434-262-100: "Upon receipt of a complete certified copy of the auditor's abstract of votes from a county auditor, the secretary of state shall proceed to include the results from that abstract in the official canvass of the primary, special, or general election prepared by that office...."

On January 5, EFF requested a copy of each county's certified abstract of the recount in accordance with WAC 434-262-080. The documents provided in response were received January 11. The information was available on January 7, but EFF staff were informed that an attorney had to review it first. This legal review apparently occurred around 3 p.m. on January 11, after the legislature had certified the gubernatorial election.

Not provided, however, was the "written narrative documenting errors and discrepancies discovered and corrective action taken." The Secretary of State says no written narratives have been provided by the counties which means one of two things: 1) counties are in violation of WAC 434-262-080, or 2) no "errors and discrepancies" or "corrective action" occurred.

Among the records that were provided:

1. Clark County - No sworn affidavit was provided. The county also did not provide the total number of active registered voters in all precincts; total of inactive; total number of all registered voters and the total votes cast.

2. Garfield County - No sworn affidavit was provided. The county also did not provide the total number of active registered voters in all precincts; total of inactive; total number of all registered voters and the total votes cast.

3. King County - No sworn affidavit was provided. The county also did not provide the total number of active registered voters in all precincts; total of inactive; total number of all registered voters and the total votes cast.

The following counties' vote abstracts failed to include the county seal as required by WAC 434-262-070 and 080: Adams, Asotin, Benton, Chelan, Columbia, Douglas, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lewis, Mason, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Skagit, Snohomish, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla and Whitman.

In certifying the manual recount despite these violations, the Secretary of State was not in compliance with state law. Though the legislature has now certified the election, hearings should be held to determine the causes for these election violations. Those responsible must be held accountable, and corrective action must be taken immediately.

Note: EFF will be releasing a detailed election analysis in the near future identifying additional violations of state and federal election law. For more details, please visit EFF's Voter Integrity Project.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: crook; dinorossi; eff; election; fraud; gregoire; magregiore; recount; reed; revote; robber; rossi; stealingelections; themostcorruptstate; thief

1 posted on 01/13/2005 2:26:36 PM PST by truth49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius; Chad Fairbanks

Ping.


2 posted on 01/13/2005 2:27:35 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Christine Fraudoire is not my governoire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777

Please ping the chapter.


3 posted on 01/13/2005 2:29:15 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truth49
Even though it is on the top, a first bumpTTT.
EFF deserves tremendous recognition and gratitude for what they do.
4 posted on 01/13/2005 2:29:31 PM PST by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

So, are you folks up for a recall of the SOS?


5 posted on 01/13/2005 2:30:18 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

The Supremes in Washington regularly toss conservative law as they see fit. I'm sure Bob is right, but the courts in Washington are no place to expect rules enforced on behalf of conservatives.


6 posted on 01/13/2005 2:37:09 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Democrat Obstructionists will be Daschled!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Rossi will be on Sean Hannity's radio show in about 1 minute.


7 posted on 01/13/2005 2:38:06 PM PST by jellybean (Free Ol' Crusty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

bump


8 posted on 01/13/2005 2:50:05 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Dear God!

The deeper you look, the worse it gets.

Maybe we need to go back to Statehood, and start fresh. I'm skeptical that the present crowd is even qualified to make the changes that are necessary.

Gonna take some time...


9 posted on 01/13/2005 3:14:15 PM PST by Bean Counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49; Publius
Sam Reed can decertify the election. In fact, he is required to do so.

If someone was to file a petition to recall Sam Reed on this basis alone, it would be successful. Sam Reed could avoid a decision on a petition to recall him by simple certifying the election and enforce it in an action in superior court.
10 posted on 01/13/2005 3:39:51 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Sam Reed is a Repub? Right?

Wasn't he getting slammed for certifying the vote? Maybe he had a plan.

11 posted on 01/13/2005 3:44:04 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Sam's not that smart.


12 posted on 01/13/2005 3:51:37 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter
Maybe we need to go back to Statehood, and start fresh. I'm skeptical that the present crowd is even qualified to make the changes that are necessary.

It has been rumored that is represented to the public to be the Constitution of the State of Washington, is not the document submitted to Congress when Washington was admitted to the union of States. I've seen a certified copy of what i have been told is the document sent to Congress; and it is quite different. There is quite a sordid history of the state of Washington around 1889, including a number of very suspicious fires in a number of locations related to Washington constitution.

13 posted on 01/13/2005 3:56:41 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Maybe some little bird whispered it in his ear.

If it works out....looks like Washington will have solved a huge problem. God, I hope so.

14 posted on 01/13/2005 4:10:23 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Just wait til Monday. There will be a surprise developement related to Gregoire.


15 posted on 01/13/2005 4:19:54 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

What do you mean????? Please, don't taunt me.


16 posted on 01/13/2005 4:23:28 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Ping me please!

BTTT

I just love how Liberals embrace all things illegal.


17 posted on 01/13/2005 4:27:51 PM PST by Danae (Liberals are the greatest enemy of freedom on Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

What happens on Monday??? PLEASE don't leave us in the dark! We are the loyal ones! :)


18 posted on 01/13/2005 4:28:50 PM PST by Danae (Liberals are the greatest enemy of freedom on Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

Hello...I have to get supper on the table....tell me....Plllllllllllllleeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaassssssssseeeeeee.


19 posted on 01/13/2005 4:31:01 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: truth49

No surprise it never ends. If anyone has any evidence the FBI in Seattle is waiting for it. My husband called today. They are aware of our election dilemma. They said they cannot act on news reports alone.


20 posted on 01/13/2005 4:37:17 PM PST by Vicki (Truth and Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49
BTTT!

But the LAWS are not to interfere with electing Democrats!

21 posted on 01/13/2005 4:38:29 PM PST by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

BTTT


22 posted on 01/13/2005 4:40:04 PM PST by Danae (Liberals are the greatest enemy of freedom on Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vicki

Did he call in to John Carlson's show?? I heard a male caller say the same thing (close to 6 p.m.). If so, he did well! He has a nice voice


23 posted on 01/13/2005 7:51:18 PM PST by Seattle Conservative (Seattle Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative
Yes that was him! Thank you.

He had just called me before he got on and I thought he had given up on getting on because he had been holding for an hour. So I was surprised when I heard his voice.

24 posted on 01/13/2005 8:06:02 PM PST by Vicki (Truth and Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 007Dawg; 12.7mm; 11B3; 123easy; 1911A1; 4woodenboats; 506trooper; 7mmMag@LeftCoast; A44MAGNUT; ...
Washington State Ping List

This is all known Washington State FReepers and interested parties as of 1/12/05 - 356 FReepers

If you want on or off this ping list Freepmail me.

ReVote WA

The latest @ Sound Politics.com

25 posted on 01/14/2005 12:05:41 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (Well.... I'll be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
There is quite a sordid history of the state of Washington around 1889, including a number of very suspicious fires in a number of locations related to Washington constitution.

Pretty interesting stuff. Can you tell us more? What happened?

26 posted on 01/14/2005 12:18:02 PM PST by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Rec'd this via email this a.m. Thanks for posting anyway.


27 posted on 01/14/2005 12:28:24 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots; Bean Counter; Libertina

As they say,...the Devil is in the details, and in this case, it's that devil that's going to bite them in the end. It's not one little screwup or fraudoir, it's now in the dozens. One of them is going to reap rewards


28 posted on 01/14/2005 12:38:13 PM PST by holyscroller (A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him to the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truth49
What is being forgotten in all of this mish-mash of legalese is that GreGorvych HAD to win because she had already picked out her party dress!

(Too bad that no one showed up to admire her ;'}

(Oh, yea.../HEAVY sarc!)
29 posted on 01/14/2005 12:40:56 PM PST by rockrr (Revote or Revolt! It's up to you Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49
Washington State Politics & Elections
brought to you courtesy of
RINGLING BROTHERS!

....

Presenting! Imposters, Freaks, Tricksters, Sleight-of-Ballot Maneuvers, Trained Elephants, Heaps of Manure! Clowns, Tricks Worthy of Houdini! Things Never before Seen by the Eye of Man!

Here's a standard a bit too difficult, apparently, to be followed: WAC 434-262-090: "... No county's certified copy of the abstract of votes shall be considered as complete for acceptance by the secretary of state until all of the material required by statute and regulation has been received by the secretary of state...."
30 posted on 01/14/2005 2:34:21 PM PST by GretchenM (It remains to be seen what God will do through a person who gives Him all the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

I can't blame King Co. for not submitting a sworn affidavit. No one on staff is dumb enough to set himself up for a perjury charge by signing a false affidavit.


31 posted on 01/14/2005 3:48:18 PM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Re-elect Rossi in 2005!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49; All
24 of our 39 counties failed to provide all the required information for certification. Twenty-one didn't attach the county seal verifying accuracy of certification and three counties didn't even provide a sworn affidavit. Nonetheless, the Secretary of State certified the results of the manual recount.

Many may claim that not attaching the seal is trivial, but it is the law. Clark Garfield and King counties failure to even provide sworn affidavit is almost unbelievable.

Elections are never perfect, in most cases the margin of error is less then the margin of victory; in this case it is not. I hope the results of a re-vote change the outcome of this election, but I think a re-vote –regardless of the winner – is essential, in order to give credibility to this governor. I truly believe – and I hope I am correct – that I would feel the same way if these questions existed and the results were reversed.

32 posted on 01/14/2005 4:47:10 PM PST by Friend of thunder (No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Sam Reed could avoid a decision on a petition to recall him by simple certifying the election and enforce it in an action in superior court.

Certifying or decertying?

33 posted on 01/14/2005 4:49:36 PM PST by Friend of thunder (No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Friend of thunder

I meant to say decertify.


34 posted on 01/14/2005 5:03:24 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

Did the legislature have this info when they certified her? Isn't that a violation of their own oath of office?

It's astounding that King county didn't provide any documents. Considering they were digging up voters there.

This election is a travesty and an outright fraud. King county found new ballots what 7, 8, 9 times?

And she has shown her integrity, or lack of it, by supporting the fraud.


35 posted on 01/14/2005 5:08:41 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: djf

What else would expect from a racketeer.


36 posted on 01/14/2005 5:12:15 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Friend of thunder

When the news of the 3539 vote to voter disparity in King County was 1st announced, I called the SOS to get educated on how they can certify a moving number. I was told, very specifically, that Kink Kounty had signed an affadavit certifying the numbers, and the SOS then certifies that county's results based on that affadavit. Either the person I talked to was misinformed on the SOS having received the affadavit, or I was directly lied to.


37 posted on 01/14/2005 11:58:37 PM PST by 4woodenboats (I see Dead People - and they're voting in Seattle!! New Washington State Governor election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 4woodenboats; All

Somebody's-lying-their-butt-off bump.


38 posted on 01/15/2005 1:01:51 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: truth49
A few people have been working on the 'recallreed' complaint and petition this weekend. The final version of the petition (minus final approval of the wording by the Attorney General) should be posted at 'recallreedblog.blogspot.com' by Sunday night. One of the petitioners will be delivering the complaint in person to the Secretary in Olympia on Tuesday.

Even though the petition will be posted we can not garner any signatures until the final approval from the AG. We have an email now: recall@comcast.net and will probably change the blog name to make it shorter.

39 posted on 01/15/2005 7:25:03 PM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

Well, it's Monday. Any announcement?


40 posted on 01/17/2005 1:03:16 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: djf

State offices ar closed today. Be patient. Won't be much longer.


41 posted on 01/17/2005 1:27:58 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

I'm at the point that I think even if there was a truckload of affidavits delivered to Oly declaring there had been intentional voter fraud, TPTB would just ignore them. I completely lost faith in the election process years ago. This only proves that my suspicions were correct.


42 posted on 01/17/2005 1:34:11 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: djf

Stefan Sharkansky of Soundpolitics.com will be on Frit Hume's show today at 6 pm (EST)/3pm(PST). Might want to watch. This election will be getting some major national coverage very soon.


43 posted on 01/17/2005 1:39:02 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

Frit=Brit


44 posted on 01/17/2005 1:39:31 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

The vast majority of Americans want term limits.

So what?


A very large segment want immigration reform and border control.

Wish all you want...


Nafta/Gatt was not wanted by Americans.

Didn't slow it down a single bit.


Most Americans think the separation of church and state nonsense has gone way too far.

Tell that to a Federal judge.


There are probably a hundred more examples.


45 posted on 01/17/2005 1:49:37 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
This election will be getting some major national coverage very soon.

You have alluded to this before – please understand, I am not doubting your knowledge or credibility – could you be a bit more specific? I’ve been waiting all weekend and, so far, nothing.

I understand you can’t reveal confidential information, but I am growing concerned that the controversy about this election may fade away.

46 posted on 01/17/2005 4:36:46 PM PST by Friend of thunder (No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

Besides the hearing this morning, any news?


47 posted on 01/20/2005 5:39:09 AM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson