Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Bush really win Wisconsin? Possible voter fraud identified in Milwaukee
Blogs for Bush ^

Posted on 01/17/2005 9:49:18 AM PST by Nascardude

We're all completely familiar by now with the pretty rock-solid indications that the Democrats stole the Washington governors race - and now that we're getting proof of the rather large Democratic efforts at voter fraud, I think it is high time we started to look everywhere - and some people have started to take a look at Wisconsin.

Stranded on Blue Islands gives us the whole scoop about the Wisconsin vote but I'll just note three things:

1. You can register to vote on election day in Wisconsin.

2. In Miwaukee alone, 10,000 votes cannot be verified - ie, they cannot locate a voter at the address given at the precinct.

3. Kerry won Wisconsin by 11,384 votes.

Nothing surprised me more on election day than John Kerry winning Wisconsin; for weeks, I had that State pegged as a Bush State - and so did a lot of other pundits, based upon polls showing it leaning towards President Bush. Then election day comes, and Kerry pulls out a narrow win. Given that one of the three Democratic strongholds of Wisconsin has 10,000 so-far unaccountable votes, I think it stands to reason that the State of Wisconsin was stolen - adding Wisconsin's results to Washington's, I begin to feel safe in finally saying in public what I've only thought in private; that in both 2000 and 2004 the entire Democratic plan was to steal the election.

We all remember how close Gore came to pulling it off in Florida in 2000, but what is less well remembered is how his minions nearly stole Missouri and how President Bush was prepared to challenge the vote in Wisconsin, Iowa and New Mexico in 2000 until it became clear that the only way to defeat the Democratic attempts at theft in 2000 was to concentrate on the Florida vote. In 2004, we have the Washington and Wisconsin examples, but those of us who paid close attention remember the Democratic shennanigans in Detroit and Philadelphia - given that Kerry's margin of victory in both Michigan and Pennsylvania hinged upon how things went in Detroit and Philadelphia, we've at least got reason to urge investigations.

The Democrats immediately lept to their paranoid conspiracy theories about the Ohio vote in 2004 - we GOPers, on the other hand, have held-fire even though we thought things rather odd; held-fire, that is, until we've gotten something to go on. What we need is for people on the ground in the areas affected (ie, in Detroit, in Philadelphia, in Milwaukee, etc) to do a bit of sniffing around - the reason Democratic voter fraud has gone unchallenged for so long is because no one challenged it. Let's start challenging.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: belling; cheeseheads; democratscheat; dirtycrats; dirtyrats; disgusting; electioneering; electionfraud; electionrigging; elections; filthyliblies; fraudulentvoters; markbelling; milwaukee; phonyregistrations; rats; redstatewisconsin; sickening; stealingelections; tombarrett; votefraud; voterfraud; voteridnow; votetampering; wisconsin; wistolenelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Nascardude; ken5050; Vicki; MattinNJ; LexBaird; shezza; BohDaThone; pepsionice; ohCompGk; ...
SOURCE: http://www.conservativeaction.org/resources.php3?nameid=votefraud

How Democrats Steal Elections - Top 10 Methods of Liberal Vote Fraud

1. Over-Voting. In Democrat strongholds like St. Louis, Philadelphia and Detroit, some precincts had 100% of their registered voters voting, with 99% of the ballots going to Gore. Clearly, multiple voting resulted in extra tallies for Gore in the 2000 election. (New York Post, 12/09/00).

2. Dead Voters. This classic Democratic method of vote fraud goes all the way back to 1960 in Chicago and Dallas. The 2000 election was no exception. In Miami-Dade County, for example, some of the 144 ineligible votes (those which officials actually admitted to) were cast by dead people, including a Haitian-American who's been deceased since 1977 (Miami-Herald, 12/24/00).

3. Mystery Voters. These "voters" cast votes anyway but are not even registered to vote. In heavily Democratic Broward County, for example, more than 400 ballots were cast by non-registered voters. (Miami-Herald 1/09/01)

4. Military ballots. Many of these votes were disqualified for the most mundane and trivial reasons. At least 1,527 valid military ballots were discarded in Florida by Democratic vote counters (Drudge Report, 11/19/00).

5. Criminals. Felons are a natural Democratic voter and they're protected on voter rolls across the country. In Florida at least 445 ex-convicts - including rapists and murderers -- voted illegally on November 7th. Nearly all of them were registered Democrats. (Miami-Herald 12/01/00)

6. Illegal aliens. These voters have long been a core liberal constituency, especially in California. In Orange County in 1996, Rep. Bob Dornan had his congressional seat stolen from him when thousands of illegal aliens voted for Loretta Sanchez (Christian Science Monitor, 9/2/97).

7. Vote-buying. Purchasing votes has long been a traditional scheme by Democrats, and not just with money. In the 2000 election in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Democratic workers initiate a "smokes-for-votes" campaign in which they paid dozens of homeless men with cigarettes if they cast ballots for Al Gore (Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, 11/14/00).

8. Phantom Voters. These voters don't really exist, but their ballots do. In the 1996 Lousiana Senate race, GOP candidate Woody Jenkins had the election stolen from him when he discovered that 7,454 actual votes were cast but had no paper trail to authenticate them (Behind the Headlines, F.R. Duplantier, 4/27/97).

9. Dimpled chads. Those infamous punch-cards were a ballot bonanza for Al Gore. Democratic poll workers in Palm Beach, Dade and Broward counties tampered and manipulated thousands of ineligible ballots and counted them for Gore, even though no clear vote could be discerned. (NewsMax.com 11/27, 12/22, 11/18, 11/19/00).

10. Absentee ballots. Normally it's assumed that Republicans benefit from absentee ballots. But in the case of Miami's 1997 mayoral election, hundreds of absentee ballots were made for sale or sent out to non-Miami residents. Fraud was so extensive in the race that the final results were overturned in court (FL Dept. of Law Enforcement Report, 1/5/98)."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=votefraud

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=electionfraud

41 posted on 01/17/2005 6:10:50 PM PST by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hripka

I agree. But the GOP has to get over this fear of being racist and take on this fraud head on!


42 posted on 01/17/2005 6:13:43 PM PST by Perdogg (Rumsfeld for President - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hripka
7. Vote-buying. Purchasing votes has long been a traditional scheme by Democrats, and not just with money.

IIRC, in 2004 wasn't the site and campaign going around: "Sex for voting Kerry"?
43 posted on 01/17/2005 6:15:34 PM PST by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hripka
99% of the vote for Dems in some poor black precincts--YES.

100% or more of the registered voting -- NO. The New York Post cite is a column blindly citing Jude Wanniski making that claim about Philadelphia. For 3 years now, I have been challenging each such poster to name one such precinct. It didn't happen -- I've looked at the PHilly ward and precinct returns, as well as many other big cities.

Turnout as a percentage of registered is usually a bit lower (sometimes a lot lower) in the solid Dem areas than in good GOP areas. Some of the registrations may be fraudulent in Dem areas -- but that;s a diffrent issue.

If you can cite a precinct wuith 100% turnout, I'm all ears.

44 posted on 01/17/2005 8:40:02 PM PST by BohDaThone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hripka
99% of the vote for Dems in some poor black precincts--YES.

100% or more of the registered voting -- NO. The New York Post cite is a column blindly citing Jude Wanniski making that claim about Philadelphia. For 3 years now, I have been challenging each such poster to name one such precinct. It didn't happen -- I've looked at the PHilly ward and precinct returns, as well as many other big cities.

Turnout as a percentage of registered is usually a bit lower (sometimes a lot lower) in the solid Dem areas than in good GOP areas. Some of the registrations may be fraudulent in Dem areas -- but that;s a diffrent issue.

If you can cite a precinct wuith 100% turnout, I'm all ears.

45 posted on 01/17/2005 8:43:30 PM PST by BohDaThone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Mehlman/Rove probably don't know about it. However, in my County I know of at least 3 poll watchers who were "fired" before the election by RINOs in charge. There was no reason given -- just that the 3 in question my "offend" a voter by being too aggressive. None of these people had ever stepped over the line; they just weren't "friends" with the local campaign manager.

This same campaign manager also tried to scuttle the religious coalition's lit drop blitz at churches on the Sunday before the election. This was a national project (secret in nature), yet she refused to allow the people doing it to put their voter guides on the windshields at her church and tipped off the police about some of the other churches.

I know she was reamed out by the national representative by phone, but that whole campaign effort is now dismantled and the whole fiasco will be forgotten by next time when she will still be in charge.

The poll watching effort was a disaster, BTW. The palm pilots didn't work. They could have learned something if they had only included experienced watchers in the planningn and execution.


46 posted on 01/18/2005 8:57:30 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
AFTR, this is very disturbing to read! Wish I would have known about this, would have loved to have these 3 individuals in our county! We were scrambling looking for people who wouldn't be intimidated in the inner city wards.
47 posted on 01/18/2005 11:54:33 AM PST by republicandiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude

Bump for future reference.


48 posted on 01/18/2005 2:43:37 PM PST by CAR913 (Is there ANYTHING leftists won't blame on Bush???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson