Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Accused Spammer Sues Individual Who Reported It
PCWorld ^ | January 20, 2005 | John E. Dunn

Posted on 01/20/2005 8:10:53 PM PST by holymoly

Atriks claims it's innocent, but company shows up on independent spam monitor list.

A company reported to an ISP for sending bulk spam is replying by suing the individual who made the allegation.

The sued party, Jay Stuler, reported New Hampshire-based Atriks, otherwise known as Distributed Mail, to his ISP after receiving unsolicited bulk e-mail over a period from April 2003 onward. According to court papers, Atriks then lost its account with its ISPs, Lightship Telecom, Spectra Access, and North Atlantic Internet, resulting in the legal action against Stuler.

The writ issued by the company denies the allegations, stating that it was not in breach of the U.S. antispam CAN-SPAM Act and that the complaint caused lost business due to the ending of the ISP contracts. In its legal submission the company claims: "Atriks does not originate or send commercial e-mail to third parties, and does not otherwise conduct activities regulated by the CAN-SPAM Act."

There is nothing about the company's slick Web site that would give clues as to why it would send spam. The company's self-description, as displayed on its Web site, reads: "[We] have been working in computer information systems (CIS) since 1969 and with Internet technologies since 1992. With more than 330 servers in our data center and a relational database of over one billion individual records, we currently manage the business and consumer data needs of many Fortune 1000 companies across the U.S., as well as the comprehensive data requirements of the U.S. homeland security effort."

A Different Story

However, independent antispam group Spamhaus lists numerous abuses that the company has been accused of, including using techniques to get around ISP-level spam filtering, installing software on people's PCs without permission, and sending e-mail with misleading subject lines. 'Get 100 to 500 dollars fast', 'About your Internet connection problems', 'Someone wants to date you', and 'Your cash has arrived' are a few of the examples the group claims to have encountered.

The entry on Atriks can be found on the Spamhaus Register Of Known Spam Operations (ROKSO).

Spamhaus further states that Atriks could be in breach of U.S. law. "The VirtualMDA system appears to violate the recent CAN-SPAM law by falsifying the transmission path, i.e., there is no trace of the original Atriks/Sendmails server (where the e-mail originates) showing in the headers, only the IP address of the victim running their software."

Stuler has declined to comment on the case on the advice of his attorney, but makes clear his feelings on a Web page he has set up to cover its proceedings. "I believe this is a frivolous lawsuit designed to harass and intimidate. If I can be sued simply for complaining about spammers, then anyone can be."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: intimidation; isp; spam; spammer; sue
Talk about guts.
1 posted on 01/20/2005 8:10:53 PM PST by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holymoly

what's he got to lose???


2 posted on 01/20/2005 8:13:44 PM PST by BerniesFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Spammers fight back, the world's finest legal system assists!


3 posted on 01/20/2005 8:16:13 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BerniesFriend

Spammers should be neutered.


4 posted on 01/20/2005 8:18:26 PM PST by SolidRedState (Free Martha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
More articles on the same subject: here and here.
Also, the victim's site: here

JSL
5 posted on 01/20/2005 8:26:19 PM PST by free_at_jsl.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidRedState

You know, I don't think we should go after the spammer. Now bear with me. The spammer is like a crack pusher. Now all those emails have advertisements for usually real companies, mostly sleezy companies, but real ones. Now you have your target. Go after those who hire the spammers and watch that demand dry up and the spammers leave.


6 posted on 01/20/2005 9:05:55 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Spammers are not as bad as the people that put out little programs that take over your browsers and you can never get to the page you want to without having to click through a search page.

If you have ever had this happen you know it is worse than any spam could ever be.

It is almost as if the company that sells the only program that can fix this problem, is the originator of the problem itself.

I only found one program that will get rid of this type of ad/spy/malware it is at www.the..... now that would be me spamming this board and I wont do it.


7 posted on 01/20/2005 9:44:56 PM PST by BookaT (My Cat's Breath smells like Cat Food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Now that they have identified the source of the spam why aren't ten cruise missiles en route to the location.
8 posted on 01/20/2005 9:48:37 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly


(A lawsuit as bizarre as this deserves a bizarre illustration)

9 posted on 01/20/2005 10:36:46 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://blog.c-pol.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly


The spammer at work.

10 posted on 01/20/2005 10:38:55 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://blog.c-pol.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

But who’s worst? The spamers Or the dumb people that respond to spam?


11 posted on 01/20/2005 11:55:58 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jb6

I'll go along with that. But SOMEBODY needs to be neutered!!


12 posted on 01/21/2005 7:47:05 AM PST by SolidRedState (Free Martha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888
Now that they have identified the source of the spam why aren't ten cruise missiles en route to the location.

I've been wanting a cruise missile that can do a tracert for ages.

13 posted on 01/21/2005 7:52:30 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BookaT

I'm not much of a computer person, but I got rid of one of those programs by reinstalling Windows.


14 posted on 01/21/2005 7:53:46 AM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
[We] have been working in computer information systems (CIS) since 1969

Yeah right

15 posted on 01/21/2005 7:54:42 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidRedState

Yeah, like the guys who hire the spammers to send hard core beastiality to my email, where my kids might see it. Not that I want to see it either.


16 posted on 01/21/2005 9:00:42 AM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Computer-related ping! DOWN WITH SPAMMERS! DOWN WITH SPYWARE!


17 posted on 01/21/2005 9:22:05 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace (Michael <a href ="http://www.michaelmoore.com/"title="Miserable Failure">"Miserable Failure"</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
I've been wanting a cruise missile that can do a tracert for ages.

I'll place the first order. I'll contract for a shipment of 500 a day for the first week, after the initial week I'll order them on an as needed basis.

18 posted on 01/21/2005 12:35:59 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SolidRedState
Spammers should be neutered.

No, spammers need to be shot. Anyone dumb enough to buy from spam should be neutered as a service to the gene pool.

19 posted on 01/21/2005 12:39:40 PM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

I'll go for that! If no one bought from SPAM then there would be no spam.


20 posted on 01/21/2005 12:59:11 PM PST by SolidRedState (Free Martha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson