Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(President) Bush Wants to Spend More to Catch Illegals
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/25/05 | Suzanne Gamboa - AP

Posted on 01/25/2005 8:30:24 PM PST by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) plans to ask Congress to spend more to crack down on undocumented workers and arrest and deport illegal immigrants. But he wants to fund only a fraction of the new Border Patrol agents called for in a bill he signed last year.

Bush's budget plan will call for spending $23 million, nearly five times the current level, on work site investigations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a government official familiar with the spending plan told The Associated Press on Tuesday. The money would be used to conduct audits on employers, investigate violations and prepare cases.

The administration also wants to increase spending for detentions and deportations of immigrants to $1.2 billion, 18 percent more than in fiscal year 2005, the official said. In addition to paying for more staff, the money would go to apprehending fugitives and providing alternatives to detention for low-risk illegal immigrants awaiting deportation.

Homeland Security Department spokesman Dennis Murphy declined to comment on the numbers because the 2006 budget has not been released. He warned figures can change up until it is actually sent to Congress.

Bush plans to ask lawmakers to increase the Border Patrol by 210 agents. The intelligence overhaul law he signed last year authorizes, but does not pay for, the department to hire 2,000 agents a year for five years.

That would nearly double the number of agents guarding U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada to almost 21,000 and would be the largest buildup of border guards in the nation's history.

Outgoing Undersecretary Asa Hutchinson, who oversees transportation and border security, has said paying for the 2,000 agents would require a substantial investment from Congress.

"It appears, perhaps, the administration is looking a bit more comprehensively on immigration enforcement. For too long we have focused only on the border, and many people have indeed been calling for renewed attention to the hiring of undocumented workers because that is the primary draw," said Deborah Meyers, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington-based think tank that tends to favor immigration.

Meyers said Bush's proposals on Border Patrol agents are a recognition of the difficulty the government would face recruiting and training such a high number of agents.

Bush also has proposed a temporary worker program open to immigrants illegally in the country and foreigners abroad.

Bush is expected to submit his budget early next month. Congress is not obligated to implement the president's budget but can use it as a guide.

___

On the Net:

Immigration and Customs Enforcement: http://www.ice.gov/

Customs and Border Protection: http://www.cbp.gov


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; bush; catch; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; spend; term2; w2; wants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: JustAnotherSavage
FROBL's?

I'm always looking to learn more.

21 posted on 01/25/2005 9:49:27 PM PST by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

From the responses so far it looks like there is no support for Dubya's proposal to increase funding to stop illegal immigration. Dubya can not win the support of the fringe right by doing what they demand so what is the point in trying.


22 posted on 01/25/2005 9:50:37 PM PST by Once-Ler (Beating a dead horse for NeoCon America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
within 2 hours round up 10 illegal ALIENS each.

Shoot, give me a badge and a convoy of paddy wagons and I could round up 100's.

Most of whom would be young men and families who think living in our slum is several steps up from living in Mexico.

23 posted on 01/25/2005 9:51:53 PM PST by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: quantim
A democrat with a proven 'ironclad' border mentality would be a shoo-in these days.

Whatever Hillery is, she ain't stupid.

24 posted on 01/25/2005 9:52:53 PM PST by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
Whatever Hillery is, she ain't stupid.

The only thing dumber and benign than the Beast herself is people that support her views.
25 posted on 01/25/2005 10:10:32 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

I think pollyanna would be more appropriate than patriciaruth


26 posted on 01/25/2005 10:15:44 PM PST by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
What do you two have in common?


They're both right about illegal immigration, except hitlery is just mouthing the words on something that W is out of sync on with his base.

hitlery would do zip to stop it, and everything to encourage more, same as her husband did for 8 years.

27 posted on 01/25/2005 10:34:52 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
What do you two have in common?


They're both right about illegal immigration, except hitlery is just mouthing the words on something that W is out of sync on with his base.

hitlery would do zip to stop it, and everything to encourage more, same as her husband did for 8 years.

28 posted on 01/25/2005 10:34:57 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I'll believe it when I see it.


29 posted on 01/25/2005 10:53:12 PM PST by sixmil (In Free Trade We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...

ping


30 posted on 01/25/2005 11:50:37 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Bush plans to ask lawmakers to increase the Border Patrol by 210 agents. The intelligence overhaul law he signed last year authorizes, but does not pay for, the department to hire 2,000 agents a year for five years.

Oh he's series now...

31 posted on 01/25/2005 11:53:06 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quantim
So what is the difference between an 'undocumented worker' and an 'illegal immigrant?'

A person here on a student visa or a tourist visa who then works illegally would be a legal immigrant and an undocumented worker. A person who comes here illegally to deal drugs or retire or is a child who does not work would be an illegal immigrant but not an undocumented worker.

32 posted on 01/25/2005 11:55:15 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quantim
A democrat with a proven 'ironclad' border mentality would be a shoo-in these days.

I believe Hillary may be saying the things you want to hear about immigration.

33 posted on 01/25/2005 11:57:30 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
"It appears, perhaps, the administration is looking a bit more comprehensively on immigration enforcement. For too long we have focused only on the border, and many people have indeed been calling for renewed attention to the hiring of undocumented workers because that is the primary draw," said Deborah Meyers, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington-based think tank that tends to favor immigration.

For too long we have focused only on the border. Ms Meyers is out of place in the logic-free zone (Washington, P.C.)

As of a couple of years ago there were some 9.5 million W-2 earnings statements for one tax year (2002) in the SSA's Earnings Suspense File of phony / stolen, etc. SSN's. If I remember correctly there were more than 650,000 employers associated with the W-2s.

The SSA had a policy of sending employer "no match" and employee "no match" letters to employers and employees respectively. Nothing threatening, just asking for help. The SSA had tried everything to make the SSN-name match the Master Earnings File.

Hyphenated critters and screaming mobs in the immigrant rigths industry went ballistic.

Below is a reference to a report on why the SSA is unfa-a-a-a-a-air.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION’S NO-MATCH LETTER PROGRAM: IMPLICATIONS FOR IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT AND WORKERS’ RIGHTS, November 2003, by Chirag Mehta and Nik Theodore of the UIC Center for Urban Economic Development.

www.uic.edu/cuppa/uicued/Publications/EXECSMRY/ssanomatchexesumm.htm

It's going to be damn near impossible to enforce immigration laws even if Washington, P.C. had the will.

34 posted on 01/26/2005 4:11:54 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (MSM Fraudcasters are skid marks on journalism's clean shorts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: NormsRevenge

Appease me ,Appease me


36 posted on 01/26/2005 7:04:35 AM PST by chicagolady (Mexican Elite say: EXPORT Poverty Let the American Taxpayer foot the bill !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; JustAnotherSavage; Happy2BMe

..Meanwhile, we maintain active military bases in Japan, Germany, Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia, and a dozen other nations where we have no vital U.S. defense concerns.

$23 million is a mere pittance to what it costs to maintain troops and miltary bases in areas of the world where we have no vital U.S. security concerns, and are no longer are needed.

Take those troops, and reappropriate that money, to where our national defense is weakest: on our own southern border.


37 posted on 01/26/2005 7:29:29 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I'm having a hard time taking this President series anymore regarding the oath he took, once again.


38 posted on 01/26/2005 7:32:18 AM PST by ApesForEvolution (Pray for the Lord's hand in the Iraqi elections (& I ain't talkin bout the dead terrorist pedophile))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

http://www.STOPtheFTAA.org


39 posted on 01/26/2005 7:33:02 AM PST by ApesForEvolution (Pray for the Lord's hand in the Iraqi elections (& I ain't talkin bout the dead terrorist pedophile))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FBD

I believe that an initial large contengent would be needed to stop this cold. Then enforcement of the laws already on our books would do the rest. Later on the amount of troops needed, would be reduced as it became appearent the gig was up. That 50' tall cement wall idea is just fine by me. In fact it's essential.


40 posted on 01/26/2005 7:37:37 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson