Who would more than likely get an abortion - a liberal or a conservative?
My God, I just got a chill. And Bush won by 100,000 or better, I thought..
Her offer to do WHAT??? Give some lip service to godliness while passing out more condoms in the public schools?
"Freeper Infidel29 offers abortion solution... don't abort" that was easy, now on to this socialist security business...
Obvious answer lib socialist.
BUT question who should get an abortion?
ANSWER, NO ONE! (correct answer)
The Democratic Party is an amalgam of special interests, most of which are abhorent to mainstream Americans.
Fortnately, Dean is not the person to quiet these voices while giving the party the appearance of moving to the middle.
Hillary will benefit from the apparent contrast between the "new Hitlery" and the party led by Dean.
Shut up shut up shut up shut up
Shut up shut up shut up shut up
Shut up shut up shut up shut up
Shut up shut up shut up shut up
Shut up shut up shut up shut up
Shut up shut up shut up shut up
Shut up shut up shut up shut up
Shut up shut up shut up shut up
Uuummm, Terry, you would still be 60,000 votes short.
The state-of-the-art get-out-the-vote operation comprises mostly persons paid to work for the Democrats. It is a party of paid passion, and isn't paid passion also known as prostitution?
Rats! I thought this was going to be about Hillary aborting herself!!
(Ruined MY day.)
Could someone please point out what Hillary is actually proposing. Hillary is not proposing any policy change, just spinning the rhetoric so it is not clear what Democrats stand for.
As nice as this sounds, the Pro-Abortionists won't let it happen, not even from a DemonRat. In the 30 years of Roe v. Wade, abortion has become generally accepted as a viable "health care" alternative, and as such has become a money making industry. The Abortionists do not want to be put out of business (heaven forbid they find work as regular medical practitioners), so they will fight anything that will keep girls from ending up in their doorway.
It's all about money.
A pregnant woman.
yada, yada, yada...What a meaningless wish... There were tighter races in other states (PA for example) where demomcrats won, so if less than 60,000 of those democrats had voted republican it would have been a massive landslide for Bush, so what is their point???
And that's why abortion is a good thing.
Without Roe vs. Wade there would have been enough democrats to easily win the last 2 elections.
So9
I've already tested her sincerity. She's lying. How do I know? Her lips were moving.
She'll say absolutely anything to further herself and her goals. She can never be trusted. Never.
but the plurality vote across the country was what - about 3 million more for Bush - and Feinstein wants to eliminate the electoral college. (Do the dems talk to each other LOL)
This mantra of 'only 60,000 votes is just another example of how they think the American people are stupid
yet not ONE single word as to WHO that 7% are or what SHE plans to do to get their mind right!!!
Sorry,the day when Hillary recognizes that her husbands actions with Monica went a long way to cheapen and introduce young people to sex,then her words will mean something.
"Perhaps Clinton's offer was just posturing."
D'ya think? This is about abortion, but the only way the demonrats will win the presidency, House, and Senate back is to apply the same principle across the board, to wit: "Oh yeah, I understand your position. But let's compromise, you come a little MY way, and we'll settle. OK?" The fence sitters will buy it like candy.
Thus we lose incrementally rather than all at once.