Posted on 03/02/2005 7:57:57 PM PST by CHARLITE
Illustrating the abhorrent yet entirely predictable behavior of those on the left, Rush Limbaugh explains, “A tiger is a tiger. A snake is a snake. And a liberal is a liberal.” To which he should add that a “moderate” is a liberal too. Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter, outspoken Republican “moderate” and Judiciary Committee chairman, makes this point painfully obvious once again.
Specter recently voiced his concern over the possibility that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R.-TN) may significantly alter Senate rules, invoking the so-called “nuclear option,” to counter Democrat obstruction of President Bush’s judicial nominees. Specter expressed fears that this tactic would result in “turmoil” and “bedlam” on the Senate floor.
Specter may well have been in retirement by now, were it not for the diligent efforts of the Bush administration on his behalf during Pennsylvania’s Republican primary, in which the incumbent Specter barely beat Representative Pat Toomey, a conservative challenger. Last November, another razor-thin margin brought Specter victory in the general election.
In response to the support he received, Specter reacted with the typical ingratitude of “moderate” GOP Trojan Horses, turning on the President within days of his victory, and warning him against nominating conservatives to the nation’s high courts.
Now, in the face of a Democrat promise to continue obstruction of the President’s judicial nominees, Specter takes issue not with the Democrats, but with the Republicans, expressing fear that such a rules change by Republicans would be harmful to the Senate.
Senator Robert Byrd (D.-WV) says it a bit more hysterically, resorting to the standard liberal rhetoric of comparing decisive Republican action to Nazi Germany.
Sad it is that Byrd and Specter can show great concern for the detrimental effects of changes to the operating rules within the United States Senate. Yet they remain oblivious to the damage being regularly done to the very fabric of American society by an out-of-control judiciary that regularly alters not merely rules, but the very foundation of law, based on nothing more substantial than the leftist philosophies it embraces.
But while Byrd is simply showing himself to be the partisan Democrat everyone knows him to be, Arlen Specter should be concerned with maintaining his party’s stand in favor of protecting the Constitution.
Does Specter really hold the “sanctity” of Senate rules in higher regard than the rule of law? Can he truly not see that, despite possible upheaval in the Senate, it nonetheless will continue to function? But a society in which the laws are subject to the whims of a few is a society that is on the road to tyranny.
Adopting more rhetoric from his Democrat colleagues, Specter embraced the assertion by New York Senator Charles Schumer that the make up of the nation’s courts should be “balanced.” But hardly some noble “bipartisan” realization of common ground, the “balance” Schumer advocates is between those who seek to undermine the Constitution in service to the liberal agenda, and those who would fight to preserve and uphold it.
So distorted has the debate become in recent years that the original premise of constitutionality, as an absolute standard established by its framers and approved by the nation during ratification, has been all but abandoned. Specter appears unwilling to remedy this situation.
The timing of Specter’s comments is particularly unfortunate, since President Bush last week threw down the gauntlet to Democrat obstructionists, re-nominating a dozen individuals who had been denied confirmation in the past few years by means of the filibuster.
The past political repercussions suffered by obstructionist Democrats resulted in part from a presumption that Republicans would truly fight for the confirmation of a judiciary that supports Constitutional law. Any Republican who thinks that Democrat stonewalling alone will reap political benefits is gravely mistaken.
Underhanded tactics of this nature must be countered by a Republican guarantee to do something better. And “business as usual” represents no such an alternative.
In last fall’s elections, conservatives strongly supported those candidates who advocated traditional values. Their rejection of the status quo, and its corollary of continued moral decline, was a major factor contributing to Republican victories throughout the nation. They expect results.
Since Election Day, Democrats have scrambled to convince America that they too embrace “values.” Republican waffling will only make this ruse easier for them to pull off. By his disproportionate loyalty to the decorum of the Senate and callous indifference to the Constitution, Arlen Specter may prove to be the Democrats’ best friend.
Growing up during the turbulent decades of the ‘60's and ‘70's, Christopher Adamo saw, to his dismay, the nation's moral foundations being destroyed before his very eyes. But even then he was a staunch Conservative at heart, and rejected outright the tenets of America's counterculture revolution. After a hitch in the Air Force, where he specialized in airborne electro- optical systems, he pursued a career in the field of aerospace, working for major defense contractors in California, Florida, and Colorado. But his career plans abruptly changed during the industry-wide downsizing that followed the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster.
Comments:cadamo@wyoming.com
The entire TX legislature and Governor have decided to become RINO's it looks like.. I sure hope we can kill all the new taxes they proposed.
Ping!
I support “turmoil” and “bedlam” on the Senate floor!!!
Filibusters are necessary to the fair functioning of our Republican form of government. We, as citizens, should take great care before encouraging the removal of this weapon intended for use by the out-of-power political power.
Remember---the Tyranny of the Majority is never far away. Someday, the majority may be coming after me.
Much valuable data is often transmitted during the actual filibuster process. It's one of the better watching experiences on the CSPAN Networks. Have some cervezas and pop corn handy.
Yeah! A razor thin 11% margin of victory. Chris Adamo calls into question his whole article when he/she can't get simple facts right.
Shocked, I tell you. Shocked. NOT!
Arlen as himself.
The poster for RINO hunting should have him in the crosshairs.
Oh, that's right it did.
Thank you Ricky Santorum and George Bush.
Now we have to live with the results of your pathetic 'party loyalty' to a man who has NEVER earned it and has NEVER shown one bit of it in return.
Real filibusters, maybe.
The declaration of intent to filibuster does not.
The weak spined GOP is still calling it the 'nuclear' option when it is the CONSTITUTIONAL option. The real rules, not the Senate rules, in the Constitution make no provision for a filibuster on judicial nominees.
In your fear of tyranny by the majority, you overlook the outright tyranny by the minority that is destroying our Republic.
History has a special chapter for double-dealing snakes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.