Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia - 2005 UPDATE
JEFFHEAD.COM ^ | March 7, 2005 | Jeff Head

Posted on 03/07/2005 9:49:24 AM PST by Jeff Head

THE RISING SEA DRAGON IN ASIA
2005 Update

By Jeff Head, February 2005


As an update to the original "Rising Sea Dragon in Asia", that I publiushed in January of 2004 (and have been writing and warning about since 2000), I offer this update, dated in February of 2005. This report is fairly short and broad, and I believe does not contain the detail necessary to reflect the true scope of the emerging threat. But it does clearly indicate the nature and size of the current Red Chinese buildup, and their is only one principle power that such a buildup can be directed at, the United States military.

Regarding the continuing naval buildup, the Chinese have already built and launched two of the brand new, very modern, Aegis type Lanzhou Class destroyers, two of the new Guangzhou Class guided missile destroyers, two new Ma'anshan Class guided missile frigates, four of the new large Type 73 Amphibious Assault ships (that's right, four in a very short time frame and more building...can you guess what these are inded for?), and a class of very modern diesle-electric attack subs. In addition, the west has now seen another new class, dubbed the Type 51C that was just launched in December of 2005 in the Dalian, Liaoning Province. Another area air defense destroyer similar to the Type 52C, Lanzho class, this new class is similar in appearance to the Arleigh Burke class original batch destroyers, and is based on the late 1990's Luhai class hull.. It has an Aegis type air defense capability, but no helo facilities, while the two new Type 52C's are similar to the Arliegh Burke Batch IIA ships, with onboard helicopter landing and housing facilities.

All of this is in addition to acquiring four very modern and capable Hangzhou Class destroyers from Russia and a total of twelve very modern Russian diesel-electric subs, as well as currently building their own new and modern classes of nuclear attack subs and ballistic missile submarines, along with continuing heavy research into aircraft carrier design and/or refitting.

The efforts continue unabated as the Red Chinese continue to build or aquire these EIGHT new classes of ships simultaneously at a rapid pace. Eight new classes of ships at once represents a HUGE outlay in technology and capital across the board. It is almost unheard of and is representative of the massive arms build-up the Red Chinese are embarked upon with their new found wealth. If continued, it can have but one goal in mind, a direct challenge for naval dominance in the Pacific Rim and beyond. As stated, that challenege is a direct one to the United States Navy.

In the mean time, the Chinese are also modernizing their naval air forces at a rapid pace, acquiring or license building hundreds of modern SU-27, SU-27SK, and SU-30 aircraft from Russia, many with very credible strike at sea, air to surface missile capabiulities. They are also building their own new J-10 aircraft. Within the past two to three years these efforts represent a quantum leap in terms of the quality of the Red Chinese equipment and the rate at which they are being built or otherwise put into service.

Here are some recent pics.


The brand new construction and launch of the area air defense, Aegis-like, Type 51C Class destroyer.


The new Lanzhou Class (Type 52C) Aegis-like destroyer. 1st commissioned in July 2004, second in service in early 2005.


The new Guangzhou Class (Type 52B) Guided Missile Destroyer. 1st commissioned in July 2004, second in service in early 2005.


The new Hangzhou Class (Type 951/EM) guided missile destroyers. Four acquired from Russia in the last five years, two already in service, two more in 2005. They carry the Russian Sunburn or Moskit cruise missiles, designed to attack US Aircraft Carriers.


The new Ma'anshan Class (Type 054) Guided Missile frigates. Two launched in late 2003, will be in service in early 2005.


Two of the new Type 73 Amphibious Assault Ship class, of which three have already been built.


The new Yuan Class SSK diesel/electric attack submanrine.


The new Russian acquired Kilo Class SSK diesle/electric attack submarines, of which four have been acquired and EIGHT MORE are on order.


Coninued outfitting of the former Russian Vayrag at the Dalian shipyards.


Red Chinese SU-30 and SU-27SK (J11) and SU-27 aircraft.


The chinese Produced J-10 attack fighter.

As these ships are produced in numbers and as the Chinese continue with their across the board naval buildup and their carrier development plans towards ultimately lauching their own, the balance of power in the China Sea and western Pacific is going to hang in the balance. Do not forget, the Chinese have purchased and are studying and apparently refitting western style and Russian aircraft carriers. Their intentions in this regard, with the production of all the support and defense ships necessary to form carrier battle groups of their own is clear. Even without those groups, they are poducing a formidable force to challenge our groups in the inner island chain in the western Pacific.

While the Chinese experience level with this equipment is lacking and will be very much inferior to the decades of practical experience the United States Navy has, there is no doubt that the Chinese are embarked on a path to challenge that experience and heretofore dominance of the U.S. Navy in the region at some point. If within range of large numbers of land-based aircraft and missiles, and if coupled with modern, capable weapons systems like the Sunburn or Moskit missiles and perhaps supercavitiating torpedo technology, a credible threat to American naval supremecy in the western Pacific could be posed in the next few years...and this does not even address their continued rapid buildup of ballistic missiles and modernization program across the board of their land based armed forces, which are proceeding at a similar pace as that described here regarding their navy and naval air forces.

Although the hefty12-14% increase in direct military expenditures of the Red Chinese (and this does not include dual use and so-called private sector input to the defense apparatus-just remeber, in the Red Chinese system, there is no real private sector) represents a small proportion of US Military outlays, remember as well that a significant portion of western outlays goes towards relatively high salaries, benefits, and health care costs that the Chinese system is not burdened with. In terms of outlays towards pure military weapons systems directly, the Chinese are rapidly catching up with western numbers. All of this bears very serious consideration and planning.

While we do so, consider this: As stated, the Chinese are currently building and launching eight modern, entire classes of major combatant vessels (not including the two new nuclear attack and strategic missile submarines)...simultaneously. This is a monumental achievement and compares to the United States Navy which is currently building and launching three new classes of major combatants (the Virginia class subs, the San Antonio class LPDs, and the continuing Burk class destroyers) with plans for two to three more U.S. classes in the future Clearly the Chinese and the PLAN are serious about their future naval capabilities in the China Sea and western Pacific and are rapidly building up across the board to implement them. This should be be reminiscent to our senior citizens who experienced it, or anyone who has studied history, of the rapid buildup of adversary military in the 1930s. We all know where that led.

Again, there can only be one power that the Red Chinese intend to, and must, confront if conflict over geo-political policy comes into play...and that is the U.S. Navy. Such tremendous development, building and launching of vessels indicate that they intend to do just that and their intentions, capabilities and funding in this regard cannot be underestimated.

Copyright © 2005, by Jeff Head


Jeff Head (jeffhead.com) is an engineering consultant who has many years of experience in the power, defense, and computer industries. He currently wotrks for the federal government helping maintain and protect regional infrastructure. He is a member of the U.S. Naval Institute, and he is also the author of a self-published and best-selling fictional series of military techno-thrillers about future military confrontation with the Red Chinese called the Dragon's Fury Series of novels (dragonsfuryseries.com) that projects a fictional third world war arising out of current events.

You can read about that series by clicking on the pictures of the novel covers below:


THE DRAGON'S FURY SERIES OF NOVELS



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armsrace; chinesenavy; chinesethreat; dragonsfuryseries; freeperjeffhead; jeffhead; militarybuildup; plan; redchinanavy; redchinathreat; worldwariii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-260 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot; Jeff Head
WalMart only bought $15 billion from China out of $198 billion total last year. But don't let the facts get in the way of your emotions, or your poor eyesight.

There are over 6 million companies in the U.S. That's >6,000,000 for those of us with poor eyesight. Walmart, one company (that's .0000001%), accounted for 7.5% of the purchases. Come now FRiend, who's emotional?

101 posted on 03/07/2005 12:06:36 PM PST by houeto ("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Jeff Head
WalMart only bought $15 billion from China out of $198 billion total last year. But don't let the facts get in the way of your emotions, or your poor eyesight.

There are over 6 million companies in the U.S. That's >6,000,000 for those of us with poor eyesight. Walmart, one company (that's .00001%), accounted for 7.5% of the purchases. Come now FRiend, who's emotional?

102 posted on 03/07/2005 12:07:59 PM PST by houeto ("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: s_asher
Well, that site is not necessarily the source of many of those pictures, nor do they claim to be. They are all over the net.

The critical thing that I am trying to get across is the analysis. The pictures support that analysis for sure, and if I knew who for sure the actual source was, I would happily credit them.

In the mean time, as you state, and as I agree, I believe it is acdeptable fair use of what to me is mostly an unknown source as regards the pics.

103 posted on 03/07/2005 12:08:56 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I dont think it really matters where the pictures come from. If China passed its anti-sessation law (no news on that yet but China's National People's Congress was supposed to pass it or reject it today), it will not matter much longer.


104 posted on 03/07/2005 12:14:01 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN! http://asiasec.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

You have Fremail.


105 posted on 03/07/2005 12:16:26 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thanks


106 posted on 03/07/2005 12:23:26 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN! http://asiasec.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thanks for the update Jeff!


107 posted on 03/07/2005 12:27:03 PM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: houeto
WalMart made total purchases last year of $198 billion. WalMart bought from China only $15 billion, 7.5% of WalMart's total. That means when you said "trying to find something in Walmart NOT from China is worse than looking for a needle in a haystack." you were being emotional, not factual.
108 posted on 03/07/2005 12:28:54 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: quantfive

You are welcome...glad to do it. It bears significant scrutiny and watching and I am glad to see our government getting on that bandwagon.


109 posted on 03/07/2005 12:30:10 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
These bastards are probably pretty busy these days, too....


110 posted on 03/07/2005 12:35:16 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Illegal Aliens "Those Wonderful People" in Jail Now Are $1.4 Billion A Year For California Taxpayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Do you see the word "maybe" in the sentence"? That means the website is quoting from unconfirmed rumours.

I've read it somewhere else(I think it's on Kanwa) that the PAR on 052C is developed indigenously by China. Unfortunately I am not being able to locate that particular article now. So I will ask sinodefence to clarify its statement.


111 posted on 03/07/2005 12:36:42 PM PST by Pussy_Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: houeto
The Great Hall of the Whores


112 posted on 03/07/2005 12:36:55 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Illegal Aliens "Those Wonderful People" in Jail Now Are $1.4 Billion A Year For California Taxpayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thank you for this post!

And seeing as one of our carrier captains allowed himself to be buzzed by Russian fighters unnoticed and unmolested...THAT makes me worry about our defensive balls. PC will get ya' killed in short order out there.


113 posted on 03/07/2005 12:41:22 PM PST by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
That means when you said "trying to find something in Walmart NOT from China is worse than looking for a needle in a haystack." you were being emotional, not factual.

From ChinaDaily:

The world's largest retailer, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, says its inventory of stock produced in China is expected to hit US$18 billion this year, keeping the annual growth rate of over 20 per cent consistent over two years.

"We expect our procurement stock from China to continue to grow at a similar rate in line with Wal-Mart's growth worldwide, if not faster," said Lee Scott, the president and CEO (chief executive officer) of Wal-Mart.

Last year, the firm bought US$15 billion products from China, half from direct purchasing, the other from the firm's suppliers in China.

So far, more than 70 per cent of the commodities sold in Wal-Mart are made in China.

The rest of the article can be read here:

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-11/29/content_395728.htm

I will agree 'needle in a haystack' is exaggeration. Will you agree that 'over 70%' is extreme?

114 posted on 03/07/2005 12:42:28 PM PST by houeto ("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

The reality is that even if it says MADE in Malaysia or Japan, the PARTS for such products could be made in China.


115 posted on 03/07/2005 12:44:06 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN! http://asiasec.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: houeto
WalMart bought over $198 billion total. I'm sure if you looked you could find items that China provided 100%. Total goods at WalMart only 7.5%.
116 posted on 03/07/2005 12:46:13 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: somniferum

BUMP for later


117 posted on 03/07/2005 12:46:53 PM PST by somniferum (All warfare is deception - Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I so much agree with you Jeff. Red China is NOT America's friend NOR should they be treated as one. Trading with china should be halted. Frankly RUSSIA is NOT a friend either. I found out recently that during the time that Putin and President Bush were putting on the buddy buddy stay at the Ranch routine, Putin was also having meetings with some of the Arab enemies such as Syria and even Arafat. And then thanks to Clinton, China's defense capabilities were enhanced and jumped ahead years before they ever could have on their own. Thanks to Clinton, China received the technology to arm their warheads with "whatever"!! A HUGE threat is sailing along under the waters right now.


118 posted on 03/07/2005 12:47:41 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Indie
And seeing as one of our carrier captains allowed himself to be buzzed by Russian fighters unnoticed and unmolested...THAT makes me worry about our defensive balls. PC will get ya' killed in short order out there.

That fact scares me. Any aircraft that is not American that gets close to one of our carriers needs to be assumed hostile and shot down on sight.

119 posted on 03/07/2005 12:48:39 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN! http://asiasec.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Total goods at WalMart only 7.5%.

Nope. Total worth of goods is 7.5%. Total number of items in the store is over 70%.

120 posted on 03/07/2005 12:50:38 PM PST by houeto ("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-260 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson