Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revenge on system cited as motive for rampage - Nichols saw himself as 'soldier on a mission'
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 3/15/05 | BETH WARREN

Posted on 03/15/2005 5:23:51 AM PST by madprof98

Brian G. Nichols considered himself a "soldier on a mission" the day he terrorized a courthouse and a city with a gun, according to a law enforcement official who witnessed Nichols' first statement to authorities.

The official said Nichols, who was being tried in a rape case when Friday's deadly shooting spree occurred, considered himself a wrongly accused man in a legal system unfair to African-Americans.

After his capture Saturday afternoon, Nichols gave a three-hour statement to local, federal and state law enforcement agents at FBI headquarters in DeKalb County.

In an interview with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the official said Nichols described how he had been stewing in jail while awaiting retrial on charges that he held his ex-girlfriend hostage and sexually assaulted her. The first jury couldn't agree and the judge declared a mistrial.

Nichols said he was angry that many of the inmates around him were also black and he wondered how many were innocent.

"He called it systematic slavery," the law enforcement official said.

Nichols didn't feel he was mistreated by deputies at the jail or courthouse, the official said. But he also didn't care that the deputies he would soon hurt were black. His anger was focused more on the legal system than race. And the main target was Superior Court Judge Rowland Barnes, who was preparing to resume hearing Nichols' rape trial.

Just before 9 a.m. Friday, Nichols was transported from the Fulton County Jail to a holding area of the Fulton County Justice Center Tower, a new addition to the Fulton County Courthouse in downtown Atlanta.

He told officials he felt like a "soldier" when he slammed sheriff's Deputy Cynthia Hall to the concrete floor of a courthouse holding cell.

After knocking Hall unconscious, Nichols told authorities, he strolled across a skybridge to the older part of the courthouse complex to find Barnes, who was in his courtroom hearing a civil case.

Nichols said he first headed to Barnes' chambers, where he herded four hostages before entering the courtroom. He opened a private door behind Barnes' bench, approached the judge and fired, he told investigators.

Nichols said the attack wasn't personal. In fact, he told authorities he thought Barnes had been fair to him during court proceedings.

Julie Ann Brandau, the judge's court reporter, stood up to check on Barnes, and Nichols said he shot her in the head before making his escape, the law enforcement official said.

As Nichols ran from the courthouse, he turned and fired at Deputy Hoyt Teasley, who was pursuing him across Martin Luther King Drive, the official recounted. Teasley died of his wounds.

Nichols said his flight took him to a downtown Atlanta garage where he carjacked Journal-Constitution reporter Don O'Briant. Nichols told police he struck O'Briant, whom he called "a civilian casualty," because the reporter used a racial slur.

O'Briant said Nichols pistol-whipped him because he refused orders to get in the trunk.

"The only other thing I said besides 'No' is 'Please,' " O'Briant said Monday. "When someone has a gun pointed at you, the last thing you're going to do is taunt them. All I was trying to do was get away."

Nichols eventually made his way by public transit to Lenox Road, where he found another carjacking victim, U.S. customs agent David Wilhelm, who was working on his house.

Nichols told police Wilhelm identified himself as a federal agent, which prompted him to kill the man.

The account witnessed by the law enforcement official is similar to what Nichols told his last hostage, Ashley Smith, 26. But Smith said Nichols told her he didn't want to kill Wilhelm but had to when the agent fought back.

Nichols, who is in Fulton County custody, is expected to appear today before a magistrate for a brief hearing. A judge will explain that he is being held without bond on the pending rape charges.

Murder charges in the shooting spree are expected but not today, according to Erik Friedly, a spokesman for the Fulton County district attorney's office.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 10poundsofmarijuana; blackracist; briannichols; hatecrime; hatecriminal; hateswomen; killer; nicols; racecard; rapist; tenpundsofmarijuana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: DJ Taylor
found guilty and executed in a Federal prison

I think he'd be more likely to be executed if prosecuted under Georgia law than federal law. I'm no expert, but I was under the impression that it is harder to execute under federal law.

41 posted on 03/15/2005 8:38:17 AM PST by xrp (Executing assigned posting duties flawlessly -- ZERO mistakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Don't forget that he also killed a black deputy. I wonder what his excuse is for that.


42 posted on 03/15/2005 8:39:33 AM PST by youngtory (Rights are rights are rights. Just like a proof is a proof is a proof.-Liberal dorks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gotterdammerung
21 murders in the past month here in Philadelphia. WTF is going on??? This is what happens when criminals and degenerates are allowed to prey on law abiding folks.

Of course here in Philadelphia, the cops will stop me every 10 minutes for having tinted windows on my car. I guess it's easier to collect the $100 dollar fine from a hard working tax payer than it is to get out and do actual police work.

43 posted on 03/15/2005 8:40:40 AM PST by Terpesman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mbynack

Bingo, but we won't talk about that because it's not PC.


44 posted on 03/15/2005 8:53:54 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mbynack

"He shot the black deputy because the deputy tried to stop him. He hunted the judge and stenographer down and shot them in cold blood. I think race was a factor in his choice of victims."

The article stated that he felt the legal system was unfair to him, not that white people were unfair to him. Since you couldn't have gotten your ideas from the article, they must come from your own racial prejudices.


45 posted on 03/15/2005 9:00:32 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

"Your idea of we is pretty scary if you ask me"

WE, as in we Americans


46 posted on 03/15/2005 9:00:59 AM PST by Gotterdammerung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gotterdammerung
Yuck.

Those people you mentioned are shit off my shoes.

I'm glad the real Americans I have met are nothing like that.

47 posted on 03/15/2005 9:09:51 AM PST by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator
But wasn't the one deputy black?

TWO were black. Deputy Cynthia Hall who he brutally assaulted and Deputy Hoyt Teasely who he gunned down.

48 posted on 03/15/2005 9:10:08 AM PST by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Here's my plea bargain!

49 posted on 03/15/2005 9:18:18 AM PST by MarineBrat ("God is dead"- Nietzsche,1886. "Nietzsche is dead"- God,1901)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbynack

"So he admits to shooting people because they were white. Doesn't that count as a "hate crime"?

I don't know why it matters what his motives were. Who needs this crap? Give him a fair trial and then hang him.


50 posted on 03/15/2005 9:18:23 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monday
The enemy combatants at Guantanamo are not POWs. We are not at war with their home countries. They are civilians. We have elected to treat them per the Geneva convention, but that does not make them soldiers of foreign governments. Various leftist organizations and foreign governments are indignant about the detainees not being considered POWs but so far the administration has held firm.

A definition of a terrorist qualifying for trial by a tribunal is at:

Military Commission Instruction

The general requirement for a terrorist to be tried by a military tribunal is that
"The killing, harm or destruction took place in the context of and was associated with armed conflict".
Since the unquestionably guilty party has declared himself a "soldier" to several witnesses, we should take him at his word and execute him (this does not mean that we have to regard him as a actual soldier, but as a terrorist enemy combatant). A 15 year appeal cycle would be a waste of taxpayers' money.
51 posted on 03/15/2005 9:21:10 AM PST by Ragnar54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator

"But wasn't the one deputy black?"

True, but the deputy was a sell-out, he was part of the oppressive system. /sarcasm


52 posted on 03/15/2005 9:21:43 AM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: monday
The article stated that he felt the legal system was unfair to him, not that white people were unfair to him. Since you couldn't have gotten your ideas from the article, they must come from your own racial prejudices.

No. I've read a dozen related stories, one of which included a detailed description of his confession. I've also been listening to the news. The story that I read said that he felt that he had been wrongly accused and that he had sat in jail looking at all the other BLACK prisoners and wondering how many of them had also been wrongly accused.

He is the one who characterized the "system" as a "WHITE" system that victimized BLACKS.

53 posted on 03/15/2005 9:30:33 AM PST by mbynack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar54
"The enemy combatants at Guantanamo are not POWs."

Since they are treated as per the Geneva convention and have been denied ordinary civilian justice, they are de facto POW's. You can split hairs and call them what ever you want. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. It makes no difference what you call them.

You say; "Since the unquestionably guilty party has declared himself a "soldier" to several witnesses, we should take him at his word and execute him (this does not mean that we have to regard him as a actual soldier"

So which is it? Is he a soldier or not? Shall we take him at his word or not? You can't have it both ways.
54 posted on 03/15/2005 10:07:53 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mbynack

"He is the one who characterized the "system" as a "WHITE" system that victimized BLACKS."

I have only your word on this. Do you have a reference?


55 posted on 03/15/2005 10:09:49 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: monday
From this article:

"The official said Nichols, who was being tried in a rape case when Friday's deadly shooting spree occurred, considered himself a wrongly accused man in a legal system unfair to African-Americans."

"Nichols said he was angry that many of the inmates around him were also black and he wondered how many were innocent. "

"He called it systematic slavery," the law enforcement official said.

Based on this, it's hardly a huge leap in logic to deduce that there was some degree of racial motivation to Nichols' actions.

56 posted on 03/15/2005 10:18:18 AM PST by mbynack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Nichols is soon to be the next A.N.S.W.E.R. flavor of the month. Poor widdle Mumia will lose attention to this scumbag.


57 posted on 03/15/2005 10:20:15 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator
But wasn't the one deputy black?

As a minion of The Man, he wasn't authentically black.

58 posted on 03/15/2005 10:23:01 AM PST by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mozrock

"His anger was focused more on the legal system than race. "


59 posted on 03/15/2005 10:23:21 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mbynack
"Based on this, it's hardly a huge leap in logic to deduce that there was some degree of racial motivation to Nichols' actions."

My objection is that you assume he sees the legal system in Atlanta as "white". The fact is, most politicians and judges in Atlanta are black. The mayor, the district attorney, most police officers, sheriffs deputies, etc. are all black. I see no evidence he targeted "whites". I suspect he would have shot the judge no matter what color he had been.

I object to you assuming this a racial issue when it probably isn't.
60 posted on 03/15/2005 10:28:50 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson