Posted on 03/30/2005 7:12:00 PM PST by neverdem
I guess you're saying that I "doth protest too loudly"? LOL
I can understand that some people might assume that. It's also a valid assumption in some cases. Not in my case, solid monogamous hetero, with occasional flings (female, DOH!), between long term girlfriends.
I do protest the homo agenda whenever I can. I see them as a cancer invading our society. As just one example, they've almost destroyed the Catholic church in the US. My Catholic sister-in-law is so fed up with the Catholic priests fiasco, she's semi-jokingly speaks of converting to Judaism.
Maybe it's that I've been overexposed to them, not just during my life in the liberal cities on the east coast, but in overseas DOD schools as a kid.
Maybe I've had to work with, and for, too many of them, and know what kind of twisted depraved beings they are.
Maybe it's that at one point, my primary contact at every one of my clients was a homo (I think that's when I finally lost it}.
Maybe it's that one of my clients was an organization in Boston that was at the heart of the homosexual marriage drive, and my professional ethics prevented me from doing anything about it.
I have my faults, and I'm well aware of them, but megalomania and homosexuality are not among them.
LOL, FR is my psychobabble couch. I'm in the Heart of Darkness, Boston. Where else can I turn? I'd rather converse with FR "peeples" than anyone up here.
I spent the entire Red Sox World Series on FR live threads, rather than going out and having to deal with liberals.
a man with an erection chasing you around
That reminds me of a line from a Dirty Harry movie... nekid man chasing a woman through an alley...
BTW would dsc be a Distinguished Service Cross?
Lost in Translation.
WRONG on point one.
WRONG on point two.
and WRONG! on point three.
Buh Bye DU!
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
"BTW would dsc be a Distinguished Service Cross?"
No, it would be my initials. If I had a Distinguished Service Cross, I would have chosen a different handle.
Come to think of it, if I'd stopped to think it might lead to that confusion, I would have chosen a different handle.
"Most sodomites are bisexuals."
All people are intrinsically heterosexual. It takes a bad case of SSAD to turn a man completely away from women.
"Sorry"
No sweatsky. No offense intended, I'm sure, and none taken.
Its been no secret that the SA was run a bunch of homosexual thugs (Ernst Roehm & Co.) In the end they proved too dangerous and expendable.
"Any OTHER history lessons you want me to present to you?
While not a true homosexual, nothing you wrote would rule out Hitler being bisexual or having gone through a period of exclusive homosexuality during his early adult years in Vienna."
Nothing you have written would rule out Hitler doing it with dogs during his years in Vienna, either - except the complete lack of any evidence.
There was a documentary on the History Channel last night comparing Stalin and Hitler's psychological makeup. It described both as paranoid and abusive of women. My husband had to laugh - that also describes his boss to a T.
Could be. My sources are myriad. I bring it all down from the old thinker when necessary.
I suggest 'Google' as a starting point.
History Channels recent special "High Hitler" is especially illuminating re: Hitler's drug use and possible (likely) health problems.
"Homosexuals were also singled out by Hitler's party for extermination. Perhaps he wanted to destroy everything resembling himself. Homosexuality itself is not destructive (the AIDS thing is a myth). It would be ethical to leave them to their desires."
I nominate this post for Laura Ingraham's 'Lie of the Day'
"One thing I thought was good was that they went into detail on how Hitler got Bismarck to apppoint him Chancellor."
Bismarck died around 1908.
President Paul von Hindenburg appointed Hitler Chancellor of Germany.
You're welcome.
So then you know that homosexuals overall were as much a contributor to the Nazis as they were victims of it.
"So then you know that homosexuals overall were as much a contributor to the Nazis as they were victims of it."
Generalizations are sometimes useful, sometimes not. You paint with too big of a brush. The fact that some of the early NAZIs (Roehm & Co.) were homosexuals is well-documented; to imply that most people with that personality disorder were NAZIs is going a bit too far. Certainly all the homosexuals in the conquered lands who were executed had nothing to do with the NAZI rise.
Overall, it is interesting as to how many top NAZIs had clearly diagnosable psychiatric problems (psychopathy being the most common thread running throughout).
I didn't imply that most people with that disorder were Nazis, I simply noted the impact of homosexuality in facilitating the rise of the regime, which runs at great odds to the victim-only myth that is common today.
"You're welcome."
Already covered. Read the thread.
You're welcome.
There is plenty of evidence that Hitler was a homosexual prostitute in his Vienna phase. Nazi goons did all they could to remove the evidence of that but failed.
Probably because there is no evidence whatsoever that he did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.