Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Adviser to Clinton to Plead Guilty to Taking Documents (Berger)
NY Times ^ | March 31, 2005 | ERIC LICHTBLAU

Posted on 03/31/2005 4:30:05 PM PST by neverdem

WASHINGTON, March 31 - Samuel R. Berger, the former national security adviser to President Bill Clinton, has agreed to plead guilty to a criminal misdemeanor charge and give up his security clearance for three years after removing classified material from a government archive, the Justice Department and associates of Mr. Berger said today.

A well-respected figure in foreign policy circles for many years, Mr. Berger has also agreed to pay a $10,000 fine as part of an agreement reached with the Justice Department in recent days after months of quiet negotiations, the associates said.

He is expected to enter his plea Friday afternoon in Federal District Court here, capping an embarrassing episode that reverberated in last year's presidential campaign.

Mr. Berger had been a senior policy adviser to Senator John F. Kerry's presidential bid - and initially was mentioned as a possible secretary of state if Mr. Kerry were to win. But he was forced to quit the campaign abruptly last July after accusations first surfaced that he had inappropriately removed classified material from a secure reading room at the National Archives, and the case became a political tempest.

The material involved a classified assessment of terrorist threats in 2000, which Mr. Berger was reviewing in his role as the Clinton administration's point person in providing material to the Sept. 11 commission. Officials with the archives and the Sept. 11 commission ultimately determined that despite the incident, the commission had access to all the material needed in its work.

When the issue first surfaced last year, Mr. Berger insisted that he had removed the classified material inadvertently.

But in the plea agreement reached with prosecutors, he is expected to admit that he intentionally removed copies of five classified documents, destroyed three of them, and misled staff members at the National Archives when confronted about it, according to an associate of Mr. Berger who is involved in his defense but who spoke on condition of anonymity because the plea has not yet been made formal in court.

The Justice Department, without discussing details of the plea agreement, acknowledged that Mr. Berger had agreed to plead guilty to a single misdemeanor count for the unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents.

Mr. Berger, 59, was unavailable for comment this evening. In a statement, his lawyer, Lanny Breuer, said Mr. Berger "has cooperated fully with the Department of Justice and is pleased that a resolution appears very near."

"He accepts complete responsibility for his actions, and regrets the mistakes he made during his review of documents at the National Archives," Mr. Breuer said, adding that Mr. Berger "looks forward to putting this episode behind him very soon and continuing his career of public and private service to this country."

It is unclear what long-term impact the case will have on Mr. Berger's once-flourishing career in government.

While the plea agreement requires Mr. Berger to give up his secret security clearance for three years, it also allows him to have his clearance reviewed and restored within that time if the government were to ask him to serve on a panel or in another position with access to sensitive material, associates said.

But some political analysts said the case against him - which Republican leaders seized on last year in accusing him of imperiling national security - may have made him unemployable in government in the short term. He is currently chairman of a global business strategy firm.

The criminal charge stems from Mr. Berger's removal of documents from the National Archives on two separate occasions during his review of material for the Sept. 11 commission.

On Sept. 2, 2003, during an hours-long review of documents, Mr. Berger took a copy of a lengthy White House "after action" report that he had commissioned to assess the government's performance in responding to the so-called "millennium" terrorist threat prior to the 2000 new year, and he placed the document in his suit pocket, the associate said. A month later, during another session at the archive, he removed four more copies of other versions of the report, the associate said.

Mr. Berger's intent in removing the documents, the associate said, was to be able to compare the different versions of the 2000 report side by side and trace changes.

"He was just too tired and wasn't able to focus enough, and he felt like he needed to look at the documents in his home or his office to line them up," the associate said. "He now admits that was a real mistake, which he regrets."

Mr. Berger admits compounding the mistake after removing the second set of documents on Oct, 2, 2003, the associate said. In comparing the versions of the report at his office later that day, he realized that several were essentially the same, and he cut three copies into small pieces with a scissors, the associate said. He also admitted improperly removing handwritten notes he took at the archives, the associate said.

Two days later, staff members at the National Archives - who had grown suspicious about Mr. Berger's possible removal of documents - confronted him, and he now admits to misleading the archive about what had happened. He indicated that the removal was inadvertent and, while he returned the two remaining copies of the report to the archive, he said nothing about the three copies he had destroyed, the associate said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: berger; clintonlegacy; conspiracy; coverup; ismellarat; kerrystooge; samuelrberger; sandyburglar; whitewash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-142 next last
To: Biblebelter
"irregardless" doesn't exist.
81 posted on 03/31/2005 6:13:28 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

You're happy with it??? He got off.


82 posted on 03/31/2005 6:18:08 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rod1

Works for me.


83 posted on 03/31/2005 6:18:48 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Ernest_at_the_Beach

If anyone believes that Sandy Burglar will have his clearance back in 3 years, I have several bridges in San Francisco and NYC to sell them.

GW will not leave office until Jan 2009.


84 posted on 03/31/2005 6:27:09 PM PST by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

85 posted on 03/31/2005 6:28:23 PM PST by petercooper ("I hate the Republicans, and everything they stand for." - New DNC Chairman, Howard Dean - Jan '05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; Liz; Landru

Slick Willie SUX...MUD


86 posted on 03/31/2005 6:29:38 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (Terri's Death was the JudicialBranch-ordered MURDER of an innocent American citizen!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
You're happy with it??? He got off.

He agreed to cooperate and plead guilty.

87 posted on 03/31/2005 6:30:01 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The DoJ may as well have announced Berger was being put to bed without his milk and cookies....

We have NO motive?? NO report of why Berger was stealing classified documents??

The Bush DoJ is pathetic.

The fix was in as usual when it comes to ALL Clintonian criminial activity.

88 posted on 03/31/2005 6:31:55 PM PST by Liberator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"He was just too tired and wasn't able to focus enough" to know what was in his pants.
89 posted on 03/31/2005 6:36:19 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

David Gergen owes us all an apology...

http://www.davidgergen.com/index.php?page=contact


90 posted on 03/31/2005 6:39:26 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberator
The Bush DoJ is pathetic.

I knew the BushHaters would not be pleased he was convicted ...

91 posted on 03/31/2005 6:42:05 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Miss demeanor? More like TREE ZONE!!!


92 posted on 03/31/2005 6:44:59 PM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeePeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian

BTTT


93 posted on 03/31/2005 6:49:51 PM PST by HiJinx (Report Illegals ~ 1-877-USBP-HELP (872-7435))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
"I knew the BushHaters would not be pleased he was convicted ...

Is THIS "justice"??:

Mr. Berger has also agreed to pay a $10,000 fine as part of an agreement reached with the Justice Department in recent days after months of quiet negotiations.

Hey Vet -- do you have your autographed 8 x 11 glossy of Bubba and Papa Bush yet?

Let me say it again: THE FIX WAS IN (ssshhh)

94 posted on 03/31/2005 6:50:45 PM PST by Liberator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
More than a slap if we're to believe foxnews who reported he may get one year in prison and a fine of $100,000.

If he serves one night in prison I'll eat my shoes. As for the fine, I'm sure Howard Dean will find the money in one of the DNC accounts.

95 posted on 03/31/2005 6:51:19 PM PST by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo

Useful info BTTT

Thanks.


96 posted on 03/31/2005 6:58:02 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Because of this Sandy's clients will have a difficult time getting security clearances, and Lord help anybody who worked for him ~ their careers are ruined!

Not bloody likely. He'll have his clearance back in three years, just in time to assist Hillary's campaign with document "control" once she emerges from her primary "fight." As far as his clients go, I'm sure other arrangements have been made. As far as people who worked for him, since when did Clintonoids give a rat's rear end for their underlings? Being expected to "take one for the team" is a hiring requirement for these people.

97 posted on 03/31/2005 6:58:54 PM PST by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

oh, that's a great pic!

I stole it!!


98 posted on 03/31/2005 7:00:36 PM PST by bitt (It is the Soldier, not the judges who protect the US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
That's not what the article said. He loses his current clearance ~

This guy will have a difficult time getting a mortgage in the future to say nothing of another security clearance.

Forget the 3 year thing! It doesn't mean anything.

99 posted on 03/31/2005 7:03:51 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

I tend to agree with you.


100 posted on 03/31/2005 7:05:14 PM PST by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson