ANN COULTER TO BE ON COVER OF TIME MAGAZINE ACCORDING TO NEW DRUDGE

Drudge Report ^ | 04/17/05 | Matt Drudge

[RaceBannon]

Ann Coulter to be on copverof Time Magazine according to new Drudge Report

[RaceBannon]

The Army didnt eat his lunch, he was proved right by Venona

Read her book

[RonDog]

Check out the NEW thread here:

Help Ann Coulter strike back: post YOUR "distorted" picture of the TIME magazine editors here
	Posted by RonDog On News/Activism 04/18/2005 3:14:45 PM PDT · 15 replies · 397+ views www.AnnCoulter.org ^ | April 18, 2005 | Ann Coulter (with help from Rockitz, RonDog, and the all Ann's FRiends here on FR)

[Forgiven_Sinner]

Destro: "America - which is a polyreligous nation of mostly half faithfuls (religous on Sundays not so the rest of the week) - thinks it can win a war of religous conversion against Islam. "

bill1952: "I hope that we don't really believe that we could convert anyone to our lack of faith."

"Because you have it right. - We can't convert anyone.
Hell, just read the MSM screaming about how horrible America is; how criminal President Bush is; how terrible the GOP is."

Well, yes, we can't convert anyone. That's not really the purpose of our nation, nor was that the point of Ann's comment. Ann's comment "convert them to Christianity"--I always took to be an assignment to Christians--echoing Matthew 28:19 " 19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:"

The ultimate responsibility for conversion is God: John 6:44 "No man can come to me [Jesus Christ] unless the Father in heaven draws him."

The Christian responsibility is to preach the gospel.

Now, as far as a conversion battle between Islam and Christianity, Africa is prime example of Christianity winning--there are more Christians added there this century than Islam. The fact Islamic nations forbid conversions and preaching at the point of death indicates Christianity is the clear winner. There are still Christians converted there.

The counter example is the success of Islam in the US and Africa and Asia. Islam is successful against animist type religions, nihilism, and secularism. There is a real spiritual need in humanity and Islam fulfills that better than these religions. But you don't read about too many Christians converting to Islam nor do you see death sentences on such converts.

Bill1952: "Our Boy Scouts are being hounded out of existence by the ACLU, and someone in this country thinks that we could convert anyone of faith? LOL!!"

Well, the ACLU couldn't. But perhaps the Boy Scouts could.

[Destro]

I agree with you. I like debate and I like new infos and alternate opinions sometimes.

[Radix]

"They probably just need to sell magazines. Whenever they need to sell magazines they put a Conservative on the cover. Then it's back to the same-old-same-old for 6-12 months.'

Something like "Sweeps week" for the television networks? I concur.

[Rockitz]

ZOT sandwich coming your way troll!

astrogirl
Since Apr 18, 2005

[cyborg]

You must be fat. Don't be embarassed. FU!!!! Fatties Unite!

[Radix]

Notice that the "M" is almost something like a witches's hat........

Time magazine is for chumps!

[Enterprise]

Astro, is that you?

[Rockitz]

Where's the "troll alert" ping list when you need it?

[XR7]

NO LINK TO FREE REPUBLIC ON ANN COULTER'S WEBSITE "LINKS" SECTION.

What gives, Ann?

[bill1952]

That's not really the purpose of our nation, nor was that the point of Ann's comment

Nobody was discussing the purpose of our nation.

We were discussing the inability of America to convert anyone of any stripe.

And actually that was one of the points of Ann's comment.

[LtKerst]

I just bought a copy at the grocery store, the article is ok the rest of the magazine is trash.

[TheForceOfOne]

Now if someone could Photoshop this picture to include a liberal with Ann's foot on their throat it would be priceless! lol

[Forgiven_Sinner]

"That's not really the purpose of our nation, nor was that the point of Ann's comment

Nobody was discussing the purpose of our nation.

We were discussing the inability of America to convert anyone of any stripe.

And actually that was one of the points of Ann's comment."

Now I'm really confused. First you say "Nobody was discussing the purpose of our nation." then you say "We were discussing the inability of America to convert anyone of any stripe. " That sounds like a contradiction. Unless you mean NO American is able to convert ANYONE. That would mean no is preaching the gospel. I don't believe that. I think I'm completely missing your point.

And as far "And actually that was one of the points of Ann's comment" I suppose you're referring to the "invade their countries, kill their leaders . . ." quote. I don't see that meaning (that no one America can convert anyone) in there either.

What are you trying to say?

[teeman8r]

now i'm shootin blanks..

[tame]

And if you were able to spell, you might actually be amusing.

and if you were able to think a cogent thought, then your criticism of my spelling would have more credibility.

Frankly, if you like the way Ann looks, then you probably like little boys too.

Don't get your hopes up, slim. byw, your screen name lets us know more than we care to about the handicap in your sex life.

[tame]

The Army didnt eat his lunch, he was proved right by Venona Read her book

new orleans tiny can't read all that well.

[tame]

awesome, rondog!