To: RaceBannon
Ann doesn't miss a beat.She put this on her own site. It's a picture of Time's picture editor, Mary Anne Golon with some equally unflattering distortion.
Posted on 04/18/2005 3:14:45 PM PDT by RonDog
.
As FReeper Rockitz noted on a previous thread:Certainly some creative FReepers could help Ann exact her revenge...To: RaceBannon
Ann doesn't miss a beat.She put this on her own site. It's a picture of Time's picture editor, Mary Anne Golon with some equally unflattering distortion.
...by posting even MORE unflattering "distorted" images of the TIME magazine staff on this thread.
And from www.time.com/time/covers:
COULTER RIPS MAG PHOTO 'DISTORTION'
Posted by MisterRepublican
On News/Activism 04/18/2005 9:09:12 AM PDT · 158 replies · 5,436+ views
The Drudge Report ^ | April 18, 2005 | Matt Drudge
Ann Coulter on Time's cover WND columnist subject of 6,000-word story, strange photo
Posted by Evolution
On News/Activism 04/18/2005 4:39:06 AM PDT · 70 replies · 2,675+ views
WordNetDaily ^ | 4/17/05
Idiots at TIME Mag Fall for Protest Warrior Satire (Ann Coulter pic)
Posted by tgslTakoma
On News/Activism 04/17/2005 2:35:59 PM PDT · 236 replies · 17,152+ views
TIME ^ | April 17, 2005
ANN COULTER TO BE ON COVER OF TIME MAGAZINE ACCORDING TO NEW DRUDGE
Posted by RaceBannon
On News/Activism 04/17/2005 3:58:47 AM PDT · 320 replies · 11,343+ views
Drudge Report ^ | 04/17/05 | Matt Drudge
ping
Politics aside... Give that poor woman a cheese burger! She would be even more fetching with a little meat on her bones.
I just got Slander and Treason from the library today. Started Slander. It's very enjoyable.
At least Time didn't give her the partially back-lit/lit from below/shadowy "sinister Republican" cover treatment that conservatives usually get.
 |
||
| COURTESY ANN COULTER | ||
 |
Heat Wave Coulter dressed for the August heat at a softball game in the Hamptons, on New York's Long Island |
|
I would do it if I knew how. All I can do is post a picture from Google and put a caption on it. Sorry.
Vindictive is good. Petty is not involved.
Give that poor woman a cheese burger!
She can have mine
At least Time didn't give her the partially back-lit/lit from below/shadowy "sinister Republican" cover treatment that conservatives usually get.And, as Maceman posted on a previous thread:
Remember what they did with Rush Limbaugh's cover?
What B@st@rds.
What is up with all the liberal ads up on Conservative websites as of late? Only the Google Ads, I notice.
She was stupid to enter the lion's den in the first place. Lesson learned Anne. Don't feed the beast.
Forget it Ann....your a babe. Even if my wife cant stomach you(lib. reasons for that).
Leni
Never thought she did not know or approve; in which case, it does make it a 'hatchett' job of sorts and really more thnan rude.
That said, I kind of wish she had gone along with; and not given even one Lib; more pleasure than they deserve.
1. Ann does not look that bad. Her face looks pretty, her legs look long. These are her strong suits anyway. This isn't her best or her sexiest picture, but she wouldn't have liked it (and most feminists wouldn't have liked it) if she were posed to make her look gorgeous or sexy instead of intelligent and newsworthy.
2. Part of the weirdness is her fault for wearing those witches' shoes. Pointy-toed shoes, however fashionable, do not make any woman's feet look smaller.
3. I would think that anyone who has her picture taken as often as Ann and is as media-savvy as she is would know that this picture was shot with unfavorable lighting and at a bad angle. No woman should EVER sit in a chair of that style. No woman should ever permit herself to be shot knees-first; there is no way to deal with that camera angle gracefully. When you spend a lot of time being photographed you usually realize this kind of thing.
I think the problem is that she's so lovely and photographs so well that she may not even have realized that it's possible to take a less-than-wonderful picture of her, so she wasn't as careful as she might have been. She trusted this photographer who is a representative of the MSM--always a mistake. I learned long ago never, never, never to trust people from the mainstream media. Never. No matter how nice they are. Just don't do it.
. . .missed that. . .
They did it to Ralph Reed too.
I love her comment about the Tucson U of A piethrowers: "They throw like girls." LOL!
Even with the deliberate distortion. . .Anne still looks better than any woman from the Demrat camp. . .
I would do it if I knew how.That's a start. :o)All I can do is post a picture from Google and put a caption on it...
I found this potentially "distortable" image via Google on www.thefutureoflife.com/speakers/kelly.htm:
James Kelly
Conference Host/Managing Editor,
TIME Magazine
James Kelly joined TIME in 1978, writing for the magazine's Nation and World sections in his early years. After a stint as media critic, he was named deputy editor and then editor of the World section in 1988. Several years later, he became the magazine's deputy managing editor. Mr. Kelly became TIME's managing editor in January of 2001, the 15th chief editor of the magazine since its founding in 1923.
Ann is seriously having fun exposing liberals with double standards.
The cover's not as bad as imagined. The hoopla over it might sell more copies.
Time has a long standing history. I would venture to say that you can tell whether a magazine leans to the left or right by the way subjects are portrayed on the cover shot.
Do you recall the photo of Fidel Castro? Compare that to such photo's as Newt Gingrich and George W. Bush.
I read portions of the article featuring Ms. Coulter. Now, who's being divisive? No agenda there(sarcasm/on) If you're reading garbage, expect trash.
Troll....
Rolling Stone shows where sox hides.
I don't understand how the picture is distorted?She said on Drudge that she thought that the cover image made her feet look HUGE.
She doesn't look that different from any other pictures of her that I've seen.
And, the very low angle from which it was apparently taken makes her torso look virtually nonexistent.And, many here (inspired by Doug from Upland) think that the picture makes her look child-like -- perhaps as an homage to Lily Tomlin's Edith Ann character on Saturday Night Live:
LOL! Nize.
Zounds! I looked up the definition of zithead in the dictionary and THIS picture was next to it!
Which is the real pic? I've forgotten again.
Now for your NEXT project, how about "distorting" the image of the PHOTOGRAPHER who took that dastardly image?(The cover photo of Ann was taken for TIME by a guy who calls himself "Platon.")
From www.mediabistro.com:
So What Do You Do, Platon?
The photographer behind Esquire's famous Clinton "crotch shot" on shooting celebrities, the powerful, and fashion spreads filled with real people.By Chris Gage – February 10, 2004These days, when bolder, brasher headlines spill across magazine covers in a split-second strugglbe to capture our Schadenfreude-tinted fancy, it's rare that a picture catches the public's eye the way the low-angled "crotch shot" of Bill Clinton did back in December 2000, when it appeared on the cover of Esquire. The photographer behind that notorious shot—the British-born and mono-monikered Platon—was granted only a few minutes with the then-president, in which he covered his assignment bases and then boldly asked: "Mr. President, can you show me the love?" The photograph was immediately dissected and discussed by Larry King, Bob Woodward, and a host of other media pundits and scribes. The reaction the photo received, Platon says, "said more about the media than it did about me and Clinton. It was a contemporary portrait of a contemporary president. I wasn't going to photograph him as a stuffy old guy who doesn't relate to the young people..."
I volunteer to give her part of my butt (I saw her in NY; she has NONE)
that is just too funny!
That guy thinks women might believe that tale about the relationship between the size of one's feet and...other stuff.
I assume your wife weighs about 380 Chad, and eats more in one sitting than the entire nation of Ghana! You need help pal. You're not only blind, but dumb!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
