Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States May Disobey Drivers License Rules
Newsday ^ | May 10, 2005 | Suzanne Gamboa

Posted on 05/10/2005 8:11:51 AM PDT by auzerais

States May Disobey Driver's License Rules

By SUZANNE GAMBOA Associated Press Writer May 10, 2005, 8:19 AM EDT

WASHINGTON -- States are threatening to challenge in court and even disobey new orders from Congress to start issuing more uniform driver's licenses and verify the citizenship or legal status of people getting them.

There is concern among some states that they'll get stuck with a large tab to pay for implementing the new rules and that getting a driver's license will become a bigger headache for law-abiding residents.

"Governors are looking at all their options. If more than half of the governors agree we're not going

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006; 2006elections; aliens; bigbrother; borderpolice; borders; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; driverslicense; driverslicenses; drugs; federalfunding; governors; id; illegalaliens; illegals; immigrantlist; nationalid; nationalsecurity; privacy; realid; statesrights; voterfraud; wot; yourpapersplease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-170 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
"Easy, prohibit the use of drivers licenses issued in those states as valid ID for bording an airplane."

And what constitutionally, enumerated Congressional power would you like to cite as justification for such a prohibition.?

81 posted on 05/10/2005 10:08:42 AM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt
"Why in the hell are we in Iraq and Afghanistan if our government will turn a blind eye to unsecured borders?"

Answer:

While the New World Order requires that world chaos be secured, the few countries who take seriously sovereign borders are actually regarded as much a threat (see United States of America).

In short, the President and a disturbingly high number of U.S. legislators (in BOTH parties) have pledged allegiance NOT to "the Republic for which it stands," but to the visionaries of the CFR, the Bilderburgers and the Trilateral Commission (who some claim are mere excuses for cocktail parties amongst the high and mighty).

Btw, need another photo-op of the Bushes palling around with Vicente Fox or Bubba Clinton as the Mexican Invasion continues unabated? :-D

82 posted on 05/10/2005 10:10:43 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Some on this thread would applaud internal passports as a "good thing."

God help us.


83 posted on 05/10/2005 10:11:09 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

We DO NOT need a national ID card.

Get a clue.


84 posted on 05/10/2005 10:12:00 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ragnorak
However, if the Feds addressed their Constitutional responsibility to secure the borders, deport every illegal alien they found, etc. they would have no reason to take these unconstitutional measures.

Amen to that!

It's EXACTLY why this national ID really ticks me off.

The Feds are pushing THIER job off onto the states, and forcing the states to foot the bill besides!

85 posted on 05/10/2005 10:14:43 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am not a legal entity, nor am I a *person* as defined and/or created by 'law'!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Thanks...

"people willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both"

Ben Franklin


86 posted on 05/10/2005 10:15:33 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

No thanks.


87 posted on 05/10/2005 10:15:37 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

If the Feds pay for the massive restructuring, equipment required, etc...then I don't see a big problem. But if they change the rules, and don't invest a penny into state license departments...this is more of a joke.


88 posted on 05/10/2005 10:19:13 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
AAhhhhh....I see another who understands the reason for the CFR, the Bilderburgers and the Trilateral Commission. It's (those who attend and discuss to contrive a consensus) about control of the global money (and power)and where to reinvest in the near future as to make more money while attempting to appease the masses. Would that explain why the US economy is on a 6-8 year cycle? Mexico is in bad shape economically, politically with anarchy looming in the background. Fox is a puppet too, much more than Bush.

On another subject. You really appreciate the Falcon and its capabilities or are/were you a Falcon Jock?

89 posted on 05/10/2005 10:26:37 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: auzerais

I'll fully support any state that stands against RealID. Anyone who supports this bill hasn't read it thoroughly, and does not understand the HUGE FALLACIES BEING REPORTED IN THE MEDIA. Stricter requirements for identification does NOT increase security!

People all over are eating this bill up, well it doesn't do jack shit, and will fully commoditize the info contained in the new ID's. For no other purpose then to increase certain lobbying groups ability to target demographics in advertising.


90 posted on 05/10/2005 10:27:54 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; Happy2BMe; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; blackie


I note many do not want ID that is reliable and accurate.

Yet those same that are offended by these IDs insist that illegal aliens can be prevented from entering our borders.

Without requiring reliable and accurate IDs?

Brilliant.

Who says those in America that claim they are citizens are actually legal USA citizens?

Without reliable and accurate IDs and documentation how can the feds tell?

The 911 skyjackers had state drivers licenses that should have never been issued or valid.

The feds did not issues those state drivers licenses.

I hear and see a lot of complaints - but no sane logical alternatives.

Just "they should have been kept out of America".

Without having reliable and accurate IDs and documentation how can you tell your Caucasian or Black or Hispanic appearing neighbor is really a legal American citizen and not a terrorist or criminal from Russia, Somalia, Columbia, or *Saudi Arabia (*who speaks Spanish and learned the tricks in Mexico)?

This type of mindless thinking caused 911.......


91 posted on 05/10/2005 10:35:28 AM PDT by devolve (My WWII Tribute: http://pro.lookingat.us/WWII.html - more traffic than DU-Koz-LDot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble
There is no such edict.
Good point
92 posted on 05/10/2005 10:45:15 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
However might the federal goverment stop certain funding to such states?
Another reason why we need to return our federal government to a Constitutional spending pattern - to avoid just such blackmail.
But, to answer your question, yes.

GE
93 posted on 05/10/2005 10:47:58 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
"Easy, prohibit the use of drivers licenses issued in those states as valid ID for bording an airplane."

And what constitutionally, enumerated Congressional power would you like to cite as justification for such a prohibition.?

The Congress shall have Power ... To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

I agree that the Interstate Commerce Clause has been severely abused by Congress but that does not mean that there is nothing that should fall within the purview of that clause.

Commercial aviation clearly IS interstate commerce and almost all commercial airports have been built with large infusions of federal tax dollars and very few commercial airline flights end in the same state they depart from and many originate and/or end internationally which further strengthens the case. If the founding fathers did not mean for the federal government to regulate this type of commerce, why did they ever put that clause in the Constitution?

There is nothing in the Constitution that says the Federal Government has to accept drivers licenses issued by states as ID for any purpose.

94 posted on 05/10/2005 10:48:26 AM PDT by jackbenimble (Import the third world, become the third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: devolve

What the hell are you talking about. The 911 terrorists in NJ who acquired Driver's licenses, had falsified documents.

Creating this law does nothing to stop someone from creating a fake birth certificate using someone's name of a stole SS number, then creating a new identity using their photo on the new RealID license. It can easily enough be done, with or without this new law.


95 posted on 05/10/2005 10:52:38 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Just cut off federal money to states that opt out. No reason the taxpayers have to pay for their niggardly attitude towards our national security.

Sure, as soon as all workers in that state can skip federal income taxation. Or maybe the state should just redirect witholding to them.

96 posted on 05/10/2005 10:54:07 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I would tie this to reciprocity. If one state issues a driver's license, it is honored as ID in all states under federal law. So if a few states have lax guidelines, it undermines the integrity of those states who have sound guidelines.

There is no such thing as reciprocity anymore. It's gone with other parts of the Constitution. My Texas Concealed Handgun License is not honored by all other states. And the CHL is a "public act" just the same as the issuance of a driver's license or a marriage license. (States are also ignoring marriage licenses they don't like.)

97 posted on 05/10/2005 10:57:21 AM PDT by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Protect our borders and coastlines from all foreign invaders!

Be Ever Vigilant!

Minutemen Patriots ~ Bump!


98 posted on 05/10/2005 11:05:19 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: weaponeer
There is no such thing as reciprocity anymore

There is in many areas such as marriage and driving.

99 posted on 05/10/2005 11:05:35 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth

see here:

http://taor.agitator.dynip.com/on_law.htm


100 posted on 05/10/2005 11:08:23 AM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson