Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico's Fox furious at prospect of tougher US laws on illegals.
My Way News ^ | May 13, 2005 | Reuters

Posted on 05/14/2005 11:39:27 AM PDT by AllieOop

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexican President Vicente Fox called recent U.S. measures to stem illegal immigration a step back for bilateral relations on Friday and said Mexican migrants do jobs "that not even blacks want to do."

In comments likely to raise the temperature of the immigration debate, Fox defended the role of undocumented Mexican workers in the United States to a group of Texas business people meeting in Mexico.

"There is no doubt that Mexicans, filled with dignity, willingness and ability to work are doing jobs that not even blacks want to do there in the United States," he said in a speech broadcast in part on local radio and reported on newspaper web sites.

Fox said recent, tougher measures against immigrants do not represent "the road we should be building between friends and partners."

Mexico has been seeking an accord with Washington for years to make it easier for millions of illegal Mexican immigrants to live and work in the United States. The country expects to repatriate this year more than 250,000 foreigners, mostly Central Americans headed for the U.S. border.

Mexican hopes were raised early last year when President Bush proposed a temporary worker program but it has become bogged down in Congress.

A key partner in U.S. border security, Mexico is upset at new U.S. controls on foreign-born people, including tougher rules to obtain drivers' licenses.

Congressional Republicans attached the immigration changes to legislation providing $82 billion in emergency funds for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush is expected to sign the legislation into law soon.

The law, approved unanimously by the Senate on Tuesday, waives environmental rules to allow the extension of a fence on the border between California and Mexico to stop illegal immigrants. Mexico calls the measure "overly extreme."

But Fox said he was encouraged by a bill put forward on Thursday by Sens. John McCain, an Arizona Republican, and Edward Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, to allow some of the estimated 10 to 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States to get legal jobs and eventual citizenship.

"I hope President Bush will support and push the initiative, as he has publicly agreed. I have to take his word and hope he delivers," Fox said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; aliense; blackpower; border; borderpolice; borders; bordersecurity; borderxxi; cafta; driverslicenses; drugmoney; fox; illegalaliens; illegals; immigration; jessejackson; mexico; migrantworkers; ngo; racewar; simcox; vicentefox; voterfraud; worldgovernment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-211 next last
To: La Enchiladita
The fact that Texas seems to be leading the way in caving in to Mexico, and the Bush family history of doing business in both Mexico and Texas and governing in Texas, and Bush43's appointment of a Tex-Mex as AG, all seems to be related, doesn't it?

Well planned, no coincidence...

141 posted on 05/14/2005 2:17:24 PM PDT by janetgreen (Minuteman Project = American Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: JeffersonRepublic.com
Americans of all races will do these jobs that the illegals are doing right now.

Our culture of free govt money inhibits many from taking low pay jobs. You can make more just taking child support or charity or pan handling.

The employers just want to hire the illegal because they can get around government regulations and taxes.

Some do and some don't. One thing for sure, employers like seeing a friendly face to work with, not the surly unionistas that have stagnated our work ethic with "we'd rather die than take a paycut".

142 posted on 05/14/2005 2:18:23 PM PDT by Podkayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen

Even a partial border fence would be a huge improvement. Suppose the fence covered only 1/3 of the border, in the areas with the most traffic and where construction is easiest. The Border Patrol resources would be mostly concentrated on the remaining open 2/3 of the border. A team would be contantly fixing the holes and tunnels in the portion of the completed fence. The problem can be managed, with a huge reduction in people crossing.


143 posted on 05/14/2005 2:20:24 PM PDT by captainblacksmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
I was on a thread about 4-5 months ago about this subject and I was arguing against a fence with the other posters that were FOR a fence.... I have since changed my mind---I don't see any other way, and the fence/barrier in Israel is working so well, that it just may come down to that...actually part of the REAL ID Act that was just passed with the Emerg. Supplemental Bill, calls for the fence in California to be completed. Therefore, we know that a significant number of congresscritters are agreeable to a fence....

I'm not thrilled with the idea of a barrier either. I grew up in a time when we taught in school proudly of how we have the longest unguarded borders in the world. But the alternatives seem to be worse.
144 posted on 05/14/2005 2:23:54 PM PDT by paul_fromatlanta (Paul from Atlanta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: AllieOop

why doesn't fox just say mexico, or more acturatly their states/prefectures, are applying for US statehood. If mexican lands are stats of the USA it solves all the issue fox is so worried about. Of course it wipes out his source of corruption money.


145 posted on 05/14/2005 2:26:43 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neenah

Whatsamatta?

No speaka de Spanish?

See Post #55, I translate for the Hard-of-Spanish.


146 posted on 05/14/2005 2:28:22 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Somos un país soberano en una época de guerra. ¿Por qué no podemos defender nuestra frontera?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
You MUST be asking yourself why Bush doesn't want to do any of the above.

From a previous thread I wrote:

I have been pondering this situation myself. I think it has to do more with arrogance. Bush, Clinton, McCain, the WSJ, and the myraid other open borders/free trade crowd simnply just can't envision the destruction of our culture and the erosion of our society. They believe the power and strength of the U.S. is immutable. It's just not possible for them to believe that their actions and decisions will be ever be detrimental to the U.S.

The republicans see themselves as both benevolent to immigrants and providing a source of labor for industry (such as it is these days). The left, of course, is only advocating illegal immigration to create a class of people who feel beholden to them so they can return to power.

In any case, neither side can look into the future far enough to imagine a U.S. that has been ruined. Both have evolved into political parties that believe that they are not bound by the history of human societal evolution: They each believe their way will be the first in the histoyr of man to triumph.

Our "leaders", both political and corporate, today are so insulated from the world of the common man that they think their insulation extends to the rest of us. They have enough wealth and power to protect themselves from any societal destruction that they simply cannot imagine it happening at any level of U.S. society.

There is historical precedent to show that when the top of society becomes to heavy it becomes unbalanced and is that much easier to topple. The U.S. is becoming more and more top heavy every year. Soon, external and internal forces will cause it to topple. Unless something is done to change the direction our "leaders" are taking us.

147 posted on 05/14/2005 2:29:49 PM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
sit down, and stfu.

Señor Fox, con respeto a NUESTRAS leyes de inmigración...Siéntate, y cállate la jeta chingada.

Sometimes you've got to put things in a language that they will understand.

148 posted on 05/14/2005 2:34:24 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Somos un país soberano en una época de guerra. ¿Por qué no podemos defender nuestra frontera?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

That picture is friggin hilarious.


149 posted on 05/14/2005 2:36:01 PM PDT by planekT (Go DeLay, Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: engrpat

I don't understand---why would you want to "get ahead" by taking Spanish at UTA?

Shouldn't it be that THEY take English? I am not so ready to turn over our AMERICANISM to a bunch of foreigners!

If I were going to take a foreign language it might be Japanese or some language that would help be in BUSINESS---

Do you think you are gonna get rich by learning Spanish?

I am not flaming you---on the contrary, the idea of an American taking Spanish so he/she can "fit in" to a future in AMERICA is down right scary!


150 posted on 05/14/2005 2:36:40 PM PDT by Txsleuth ( Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day
Muchas gracias mi amigo. Yo no piensar ahora mismo. Necessito un servesa.

5.56mm

151 posted on 05/14/2005 2:37:58 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Zipporah
I havent posted here for many many months..

It's nice to see you again.

and the reason essentially was I was sick and tired of being called a xenophobe and a racist because of my position regarding illegal immigration.

It's hard to ignore, but try. Sometimes it's just easier, though, to quit reading these news stories and FR for a spell. I know my blood pressure doesn't need to go higher. :-)

152 posted on 05/14/2005 2:38:46 PM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: AllieOop

Heya, Vincente?
how bout you STFU and fix your own (hellhole of a) country?


153 posted on 05/14/2005 2:39:13 PM PDT by King Prout (blast and char it among fetid buzzard guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

¡Una cerveza grande y fría!

(big and cold)


154 posted on 05/14/2005 2:39:50 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Somos un país soberano en una época de guerra. ¿Por qué no podemos defender nuestra frontera?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

ah. you caught that. good - now i don't need to ping y'all.


155 posted on 05/14/2005 2:40:16 PM PDT by King Prout (blast and char it among fetid buzzard guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

Vicente,

¿Qué tal si te callas la jeta chingada, y arreglas tu propio país?


156 posted on 05/14/2005 2:41:06 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Somos un país soberano en una época de guerra. ¿Por qué no podemos defender nuestra frontera?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day
Whatsamatta? No speaka de Spanish?

LOL ! Only when reading paper toweling !

157 posted on 05/14/2005 2:43:04 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day

muchas gracias, amigo.

I can read Spanish (studied too much latin and french) but I cannot compose in it.

May I suggest the addition of "puta" between "chingada," and "y arreglas"?


158 posted on 05/14/2005 2:44:29 PM PDT by King Prout (blast and char it among fetid buzzard guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

That would work too, I guess.


159 posted on 05/14/2005 2:46:00 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Somos un país soberano en una época de guerra. ¿Por qué no podemos defender nuestra frontera?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
I agree that our "leaders" are out of touch with the common American because they're living in their ivory towers. What I wonder about is how innocent their actions are. They can't be that ignorant, no way.

What do I think their intentions are (both parties)? The "new world order" as mentioned by Poppy Bush and smiled upon by Clinton, continued by puppet Bush Jr. Extinction of the middle class, king of the world stuff...the very rich and the very poor, nothing in between. What else can explain the government-assisted invasion of America by a third world country, forcing America to pay the bill? Police state tactics.

I realize I'll get flamed for this, but I think it's true.

160 posted on 05/14/2005 2:48:13 PM PDT by janetgreen (Minuteman Project = American Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson