Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Long-Planned "Spontaneous" Riots--They weren't about the Koran....
Frontpagemagazine ^ | 5-18-05 | Dr. Walid Phares

Posted on 05/19/2005 5:45:47 AM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2005 5:45:47 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"This is not about a particular incident, it is about America waging a war against Islam as a religion." ---

***

Hmmm.

2 posted on 05/19/2005 5:49:44 AM PDT by beyond the sea (I’m sleeping with myself tonight.........saved in time, thank God my music’s still alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Exactly.


3 posted on 05/19/2005 5:51:50 AM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
4 posted on 05/19/2005 5:52:50 AM PDT by SJackson (I don't think the red-tiled roofs are as sturdy as my asbestos one, Palestinian refugee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Freedom of the Press, sometime in the recent past, became freedom to allow fifth columnists and the actual foreign enemy to operate freely and openly in my own country.

And we seem totally helpless to stop it. I will be eternally puzzled by that gross perversion of a simple ideal.
It defies all reason, logig and historical precedent.

Where it will lead is fascinating, no matter what the outcome.

5 posted on 05/19/2005 5:54:19 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I think most thinking people realize this. It doesn't mean that Newsweek didn't pour kerosene over the already smoldering fire. (And with them, it's always smoldering.)


6 posted on 05/19/2005 5:54:24 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

But why give them the excuse?


7 posted on 05/19/2005 5:57:39 AM PDT by Valin (The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

I will be eternally puzzled by that gross perversion of a simple ideal.

Because way to many people don't understand that liberty isn't license.

It defies all reason, logig and historical precedent

That's not logical! :-)


8 posted on 05/19/2005 6:00:51 AM PDT by Valin (The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Here is another thread with an article from WorldNetDaily.

Muslim protests planned in advance? (Security official says Newsweek article served as trigger)

9 posted on 05/19/2005 6:33:32 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Give Byrd the Byrd option now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Bump to read later


10 posted on 05/19/2005 6:56:14 AM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

While Newsweek messed up, its mistake doesn't warrant this response. There had been similar reports before that didn't see such a reaction. Considering the way so many Muslims treat each other and everyone else, this selective outrage is ridiculous. This is just an attempt to throw the entire Western world into another multicultural guilt trip.


11 posted on 05/19/2005 7:04:13 AM PDT by ValenB4 ("Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it gets." - Isaac Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I'm not giving Newsweak a pass just because our enemies are lunatics.

If we want to play down the traitorous acts of Newsweak by making the main focus the crazy Jihadists, we do so at our own risk. And, is it really news that the lunatic Jihadists would react this way?

Personally, I think the riots were always a minor part of this story. The fact that our MSM is so willing to undercut our war efforts, put more Americans and American troops at risk, and work so feverishly to tarnish our image at a time of war with their false reporting should be the main focus of this story. To ignore this just because our enemies are crazies is giving Newsweak a pass.


12 posted on 05/19/2005 7:14:03 AM PDT by Texas Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Newsweek and MSM have their agenda and are not helpful for sure. But the murderous fanatics would find to use something else as a trigger anyway. I would not let Newsweek off the hook, but we should not loose perspective either.

In my book: Newsweek - 20%; Jihadists - 80%
13 posted on 05/19/2005 7:14:10 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ValenB4
This is just an attempt to throw the entire Western world into another multicultural guilt trip.

And everyone must remember that the Peaceful religion of Islam allows Muslims to kill infidels, those who help infidels and those who will not become believers.
14 posted on 05/19/2005 7:24:20 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty ("Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." —Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
The way to stop it is to stop calling it "bias", and to stop referring the them as MSM, they are DNC operatives, running a 24/7 political campaign.

It is way past time for the right to treat them as such.

Why would a US Senator or Congressman sit at a DNC table on Sunday's and be lectured to, and put on the defensive? Why would they answer questions from a DNC operative working for the NYT or WP?

They should be home talking to their public, door to door, and consistently having town hall meetings.

And we and those pols on the right should be doing opposition research on each "reporter", ie DNC opp, each producer, each CEO, who claims to be a run a "news" organization. A campaign to expose them for what they are is needed, the Dems would be nowhere without them.
15 posted on 05/19/2005 7:28:54 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas Deb
Personally, I think the riots were always a minor part of this story.

I disagree. I think the riots are THE story. When we talk about democracy in the Muslim world, we are likely to get something very bad. The war in in Iraq is going to end someday, for good or ill. But the dysfunctional mentality in the Muslim world is going to last well beyond the Iraq war.

Sorry, but I just can't get that upset at Newsweek. The media has been largely left wing for decades and has written worse things than this that did not see the response we are seeing now. I blame the Muslims 100%. Part of life is putting up with things we don't like to hear. As long as Muslims do not understand this, the world is in for tough times.

16 posted on 05/19/2005 7:38:50 AM PDT by ValenB4 ("Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it gets." - Isaac Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Similar to the claim that Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount was the cause of the Arab violence.

A claim repeated even today by the MSM.


17 posted on 05/19/2005 7:42:16 AM PDT by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

If they were planned already, and Newsweek got the 17 foot digital exam at the proctologists office, i.e. was the sucker, then that's not so bad. This may have tarnished America's reputation, but it also solidified (even more) the reputation of the fanatics as being barbarian vermin that need to be hunted down and slaughtered as any other vermin would be. They are like plague carrying rats.

If only the Sleeping Giant would wake up. I fear it will never happen.


18 posted on 05/19/2005 7:59:45 AM PDT by johnb838 (Liberalism = Leninism.... Liberalism = Bolshevism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolik
I would not let Newsweek off the hook, but we should not loose perspective either.

And loose it we will... NOT!

19 posted on 05/19/2005 8:02:38 AM PDT by johnb838 (Liberalism = Leninism.... Liberalism = Bolshevism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

Why don't we get concerned about the muzzies defacing bibles? Because we're more concerned with muzzies suppressing Christianity, murdering Christians, Jews, and Hindus, and destroying Synagogues, Churches, and Temples.


20 posted on 05/19/2005 8:04:13 AM PDT by johnb838 (Liberalism = Leninism.... Liberalism = Bolshevism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson