'Gay Days'? The reality of gender-disorientation pathology - (strong arguments!)

TOWNHALL.COM ^ | JUNE 3, 2005 | MARK ALEXANDER

[Charles Wickman]

full cultural acceptance

What exactly is "full cultural acceptance"?
And further, why do you assume that is what gays seek?

You might as well ask me where "full cultural rejection" appears in history.
Your question is pointless.

[Charles Wickman]

Your relative's situation is difficult for you--and likely even more so for him. But that doesn't mean that his difficulty should militate erasure of the natural law, nor accord him the benefits rightly-ordered societies have conferred on married couples.

My daughter's situation is difficult for her and her partner.
They have lived together for several years and want to make their relationship official. They want to receive the same benefits that other married couples receive (tax filings, insurance policies, etc.). They want to get married.
As a family, we have talked about it many times. For them it is not an excuse to be promiscuous (that's an insulting suggestion frankly), they are in a monogamous relationship. Their sexual activity is an expression of their love, they simply lack the ability to conceive a child.
Although they are researching ways around that.
If they have to raise my grandchild out of wedlock, I will be disappointed,
but I have to accept their decision and the circumstances that force them to raise my grandchild out of wedlock.

[Charles Wickman]

Swiss vote for same-sex rights
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/06/05/swiss.votes.ap/index.html

About 58 percent of voters -- or 1.56 million people -- were in favor of increased rights for same-sex couples, namely that registered same-sex couples are treated the same as married couples for tax and pension purposes.

Its not "full cultural acceptance" (whatever that means), but this is what I am talking about.

[ninenot]

Sorry about that. You are asking for legislative relief against nature--can't be done, any more than they can have children naturally.

[moondoggie]

Their objective?

To desensitize our country to eventually accept homosexuality as "normal" behavior.....which eventually will lead to them being able to marry and receive all the same benefits as married hetero couples. IMO, it's really not as much about marriage as the financial angle.

They've successfully lobbied school boards to add homosexual sex into their sex education format. They've been able to introduce books for children as young as 5-years-old with homosexual themes.

It's insidious! The idea is to indoctrinate them while they're young.

[Charles Wickman]

Again...
What exactly is "full cultural acceptance"? And further, why do you assume that is what gays seek?
You might as well ask me where "full cultural rejection" appears in history. Your question is pointless.

[Treader]

Suggestion-Move to Switzerland ASAP. Typical liberal talking point- "see, looky what europe does..." The only reason europe is doing anything these days; is because we saved from their own cultural degradations- twice last century,and they still have not learned a damn thing.

[Treader]

Not playing your game, mister. Babble on, babylon...I won't be responding.

[Charles Wickman]

But I am expected to play yours?
nice move!
I wish I'd thought of it!
LOL

[Charles Wickman]

Hey, thanks everybody,
for letting me have the last word!