Skip to comments.
The Constitution, version 2.0
World Net Daily ^
| June 4, 2005
| Alan Sears
Posted on 06/04/2005 7:39:14 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: 26lemoncharlie
We really need another Senator Joe McCarthy.
2
posted on
06/04/2005 7:43:05 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: SpaceBar
You do have a point there....
""citizenship inheritance" of $80,000 for every young adult to use as each sees fit"Communism is idiocy. They want to divide up the property. Suppose they did it -- it requires brains to keep money as well as make it. In a precious little while the money would be back in the former owner's hands and the communist would be poor again. - Mark Twain, a Biography
To: 26lemoncharlie
The founding fathers are rolling in their graves :(
5
posted on
06/04/2005 7:49:38 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(If Con is the opposite of Pro, what is the opposite of Progress?)
To: Crazieman
The founding fathers are rolling in their gravesYes, but expecially because the people with those lunatic ideas are considered the intelligent among the masses.
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: 26lemoncharlie
In 15 years, we won't be worrying about any of that.
We'll be at war with red China then.
To: CHARLITE; Neets; Darksheare; scott0347; timpad; Conspiracy Guy; NYC GOP Chick; MeekOneGOP; ...
and, a final ping before retiring: THIS is bloody awful
9
posted on
06/05/2005 12:05:56 AM PDT
by
King Prout
(RG'OIHGV 08 YAEGRKoirliha35u9p089 y5gep'iojq5g353hat5eohiahetb98 ye5po)
To: A_Conservative_Chinese
Yes, we certainly need McCarthy back. I second that motion!
10
posted on
06/05/2005 12:13:41 AM PDT
by
AnimalLover
( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
To: King Prout
OMG....and a moronic newbie, on another thread, keeps arguing about how it's no big deal that the president hasn't been able to get his judicial nominees through the Senate and that the "compromise" is actually a good deal.
To: 26lemoncharlie
Just last week I asked an attorney friend (a rare conservative) what was covered in his law school's course on the Constitution.
The short of it is that they do not study the Constitution but rather what the Supremes have contorted our Constitution into.
All law schools start with Mabry v. Madison in which SCOTUS hijacked the power of judicial veto of our federal laws. Students study case law from there on. They learn about penumbras and emanations and why burning Old Glory is protected political speech yet criticizing an incumbent pol in print within 60 days of an election is not.
Imagine studying physics without Newton or literature without Shakespeare.
After four years of undergrad where students wallow in the phony wisdom of Karl Marx, they never study our nation's founding document.
Is it a wonder at all that we are headed for judicial tyranny?
12
posted on
06/05/2005 4:27:39 AM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(Democrats soil the institutions they control)
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
These nutcases are clearly on drugs...
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
13
posted on
06/05/2005 7:11:48 AM PDT
by
mhking
(The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
To: 26lemoncharlie
There's alot of it going on right now through supplemental social security payments. I see it all the time. Able bodied adults taking from SSA and some of them even think they work for the government. It's out of control.
14
posted on
06/05/2005 7:16:58 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(I saw a woman wearing a sweat shirt with "Guess" on it. So I said "Implants?" She hit me.)
To: Jacquerie; b4its2late
It makes it kind of confusing as to where do we start "Loping Off the Heads"!?? I gues anyplace as long as we start!
15
posted on
06/05/2005 7:49:21 AM PDT
by
26lemoncharlie
('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
To: 26lemoncharlie
Confiscation of all "inheritance" would go a long way to accomplishing their goals of giving every American and visitor their "right" to free healthcare.
But you gotta eat so every American (and visitor) will also have a "right" to free food.
You gotta have a place to sleep, ergo the right to free lodging.
And lest anything think I am joking, there "is" a right to transportation. Those emissions tests you have for your car include subsidies for those who cannot afford a better car. Just as you internet tax brings computers to poor people (although I've NEVER heard of how this plan works or when the market will be "saturated").
To pay for all of these entitlements, er rights, the government will hereby garnish all of your wages and allocate them as they see fit. After all the Clintons told us that we would just waste our money anyway.
16
posted on
06/05/2005 8:18:39 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
To: weegee
To pay for all of these entitlements, er rights, the government will hereby garnish all of your wages and allocate them as they see fit. After all the Clintons told us that we would just waste our money anyway.
_________________________________________
And we know the Klintons are always right!!
17
posted on
06/05/2005 8:56:23 AM PDT
by
26lemoncharlie
('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
To: Honcho Bongs
Mark Twain, a Biography A fool and his money were lucky to get together.
18
posted on
06/05/2005 10:06:53 AM PDT
by
groanup
(http://fairtax.org)
To: 26lemoncharlie; Howlin; Timesink; Utah Girl; hosepipe; backhoe; FITZ; Happy2BMe; ...
Ping
been telling ya for a few years now and guess what there it is .
19
posted on
06/05/2005 11:55:15 AM PDT
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
[ been telling ya for a few years now and guess what there it is .]
New Constitution Version II will not be any more valid the one presently being subverted..
The threat of revolution by an armed populace is now and has always been the ONLY guarantor of "the People" and their "rights"... Big difference between "rights" and gov't granted privileges.. Our rights have been stolen and replaced by privileges and it has been getting worse for a hundred years.. Nothing new here..
When "the People" are too much of a coward to exercise that "RIGHT"(2nd amendment).. then the constitution is a small matter anyway.. Then ALL discussions about rights is merely bitching by whiners..
Do you know ANY say, republican, that would turn down a government check.?.
See what I mean.. No, or few principled people left..
20
posted on
06/05/2005 12:16:25 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson