"Reporting for doody"
We will see his complete records when pigs fly.
Yep. 'Cause he's a traitor and a liar.
Hounding led to him admitting that he was never in Cambodia. No telling what more hounding will lead to.
I need no more proof to support my conclusion that Kerry is an idiot, a liar, a traitor and a useless human leech.
On the mixed-up files of John Kerry
Reader John Boyle writes:
I have been yelling since last year that the Navy does not have Kerry's records, nor does DoD.
The Navy has always been Kerry's hide-out. The Navy is covered by the Privacy Laws. You're a lawyer, right? The SF 180 is generically addressed to the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis. These records are 30 to 40 years old. They are history! They do not stay at Navy Personnel Command forever.
It seems to me that all of Kerry's tortured rhetoric on this subject attests to the fact that he was having his records vetted, in spite of the public claim to openness. How to accomplish this? Tell the NPRC, on the SF 180, that the designated recipient of the records is to be a federal Agency (subject to the Privacy Laws) - the Navy!
Then, Kerry or his people get to vet the records at the Navy's offices, allow release of what they want by another required waiver separate from the SF 180, withhold what they don't want out there, and the Navy cannot comment on the process, their holdings - or their withholdings!
The trick is in whom he designated to receive the outflow from NPRC. Read the opening of Kranish's article again:"The records, which the Navy Personnel Command provided to the Globe..."
This is not rocket science, yet no one seems to understand what was done here.
Boyle followed up with the following message:
I want to give you another shot on this, just to be sure you understand. It is crystal clear obvious to me, yet very few people seem to get it...is it how I 'splain it?
The SF 180 is actually a request for "Report of Separation" and all such documents are in the sole custody of the National Personnel Records Center, in St. Louis - not the branch in which the veteran served (in this case the Navy). And the character of Kerry's "separation" (discharge) from the Navy is obviously the document(s) that are hot.
The SF 180 directs the National Personnel Records Center to release records, at the request of the documented veteran, and send them to whomever he designates (usually himself) - period. What is the Navy doing in the middle of this? The Navy must have been the designated recipient, on this specific SF 180 (not the Boston Globe, as Kranish explicitly admits). As a Federal entity, the Navy is then subject to Privacy Laws and any release by them had to be additionally waived by Kerry - or not. He could then easily not waive specific documents for release that he found damaging. What the Boston Globe got was the remainder of whatever the Navy received from NPRC, less what Kerry wished to withhold.
It may be that the Globe is unaware of this game; although I wrote about this at length last week to their reporter Joan Vennochi, who had written that Kerry's 180 was in the pipeline, in order to alert the Globe to what was afoot.
A real shell game.
We have it on good authority that ace reporter Thomas Lipscomb is working the story of the Globe and Kerry's records as well. Until Lipscomb's stories surface, we'll try mull over Boyle's explanations.
Char
"Reporting for doody"That's not a bad idea!
</sarcasm>
As a Dim insider, he apparently knows where the corpses are buried...
At least he told us that Mary Cheney is a lesbian.Swift Boat Veteran For Truth John O'Neill Comments on Kerry's 180 'Release'
6/7/05
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1418592/posts
"Live" with TAE: John O'Neill (in-depth interview with a leader of Swift Boat Vets)
American Enterprise Online ^ | April 2005 issue
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1363400/posts
O'NEILL: ...None of us will ever forget the day Kerry testi-fied before Congress. It was like the Kennedy assassination.
And so we just couldn't live in the United States if we didn't make a statement about his testimony in 1971...."
There is no need to impeach Hanoi Kerry from the US Senate
He is there illegally!
WAKEUP AMERICA!
For those who "forgot" what Hanoi Kerry
did in the past read on and learn the truth.
Hanoi Kerry was still a USNR officer while he:
gave false hearsay testimony to Congress
negotiated with the enemy
helped the US lose a war
abetted in the deaths of millions
created a hostile environment for all servicemen
Why is Kerry still in the US Senate?
This is in violation of
U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 Sec 3
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxiv.html
And the FBI has proof of his treason.
Hanoi Kerry Timeline of a traitor
includes FBI files
May 1970
Kerry and Julia traveled to Paris, France and met with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, the Foreign Minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam (PRG), the political wing of the Vietcong, and other Viet Cong and Communist Vietnamese representatives to the Paris peace talks, a trip he now calls a "fact-finding" mission.
(U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953, declares it illegal for a U.S. citizen to go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power.)
http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html
a) A person charged with absence without leave or missing movement in time of war,
or with any offense punishable by death,
may be tried at any time without limitation.
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm#*%20843.%20ART.%2043.%20STATUTE%20OF%20LIMITATIONS
Distribute these url's!
Links to Anti Kerry sites
212 LINKS
News reports,
Viper's Vietnam Veterans Page
http://members.aol.com/ga1449ga/links/links.html
EXPOSE HANOI KERRY!
MUST SEE WEBSITE!!!!
http://www.kerrystreason.com/index.html
Full details on these url's!
http://stophanoikerry.150m.com
There is a backup site
if the 1st url is unavailable.
http://tonkin.spymac.net/hanoikerry1.html
Did you see this...?
(The 'Kerry's Promise Counter')
http://polipundit.com/index.php?p=6628
Polipundit even tells you how to install it on your own page!
Swift Boat Veteran For Truth John O'Neill Comments on Kerry's 180 'Release'
6/7/05
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1418592/posts
The healine of this article should be:
Kerry staffer hints that Republicans should direct their attention to Hillary's "Mena" connection.
After everything the bloggers have done to unmask the left's half-truths and outright lies, did this nit-wit actually think that he could get away with a limited-modified hang out?
What a maroon!
That explains everything.
Kerry's discharge is in Sandy Berger's pants.
You mean sKerry pulled a fast one? I'm shocked! Shocked I tells ya!
Anyone expecting that Kerry will come clean needs a reality check. The yellow-striped,lily-livered, VC-lovin', commie SOB can't reveal the depth of his treachery because he'd lose his job... not that he ever really does it anyway.
As I pointed out yesterday, to a few people who should be looking into this so-called "release", these are the remaining relevant questions.
Is the public getting a copy of the Form 180 that Kerry says he submitted? Why does that matter?
It matters because the pertinent part of the form that deals with the release of documents is in item 2 of section 2 of the form. Knowing what Kerry wrote, in item 2 of section 2, would tell us a lot. The form is not designed so that the mere submission of the signed form creates an automatic release of everything in the file. What is "released" is whatever the requester asks to be released, and nothing more.
For instance, before he submitted the Form 180, his last public comment had been that his staff was looking into the issue. Why? Just sign the form? Think back to what I just said. One could guess that they were making a list of what had already been given to the public.
In order to affect a worthless release (containing no new public information) all that Kerry had to do was to type "see attached" in item 2 of section 2, and then attach a list of the only documents he wanted to let the public see (the ones he had already let us see). His "release" would have been phony, because the only thing the Boston Globe or anyone else would have gotten were Navy "copies" of the "copies" they already had from Kerry himself, and nothing else.
Someone with the personal/corporate means, money and access to a media venue needs to continue this pursuit.
The place to start is to get a copy of the Form 180 he claims he submitted.
Here's a job for Drudge.
They mean by not posting Kerry's grades his psuedo intellectual pose might be threatened. I doubt it; it's still intact.
However, don't expect to see Kerry's full record. He isn't going to let his anti american pose or stance be broadcast for all to see.
I'd love to see his records just to gloat and use one of my favorite phrases, "I told you so!"
(I get to use it so seldom)
But, really, it doesn't matter any more. Kerry will never, ever, never, ever be a candidate for president again, unless it's in an extremely weird parallel universe.
Give Hanoi John Effin Kerry an ordinary enema and the remains would fit in a standard issue matchbox. FACT.
Sign the SF-180 for REAL, John-Boy!
That is IF you have the "stones"......and I'm betting that ya don't.